688.jpg

恩!三十年河東河西,難道,台灣窮小子真的給喇仔肉糊到嗎?
這類東東早死了!何苦,一挖再挖呢?挖林娘,香蕉芭樂!
自述篇:

nationissm tune 1
preface
It can not stand the separatist terror,in particular,the Nazism & Militarism.
summary:
Obviously speaking, perhaps that the nationalism should have been dissolution in the nineteenth century.
Yet, the definition of the nationism should not be based not on ethnicity , it is religion.
Thus, in the legal sense only was specifically to protect its of the religious rights .
This is no matter what the ethnic background and only for particular definition.
It cannot canied that it is able to preserve its own languages and cultural identity.
In particular,the faction with rights of self-determination.
So far,the way of saying about the history, language and experience,especially,there is no expression in favor of ethnic separatism.
However,the problem focus on the need for development .
It's wondering that there did not demand a separate nation of the dependency.
So,It has to be forced, therefore, that people prefer to live in their own nation.


-------中文版分格線---------------------------

香蕉芭樂之民族主義首部曲
前言

It can not stand the separatist terror,in particular,the Nazism & Militarism.
summary:

評心而論,民族主義,大概應該在十九世紀就解體;
然而,民族主義的定義,應該不是種族;它是宗教;
因此,在法律意義上,只是專門為保護其宗教權利;
這是不論種族背景,或僅是,一個特別定義;
不可否認,它是能夠保有語言,文化認同;
特別是單獨權利的自決權;
到目前為止,說法上相關於歷史,語言和經驗,格外是,沒有說明贊同民族分裂;
然而,問題是集中在發展需要;
納悶是,沒有要求一個獨立的國家思維;
所以,必須強調的是,人們更願意在自己的國家.


arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()