1457513_10151673628361065_25862918_n


新型態&新模式台灣安全共識(二)

COPYRIGHTED BY 台灣窮小子 Jun.1.2012

一,
端視全球各國政府和其領導人支持和尋求不斷發展的共同安全政策,包括,夥伴關係;
因為,他們不相關於老掉牙的歴史,文化和哲學,等等;
簡單來說,共識是共同安全政策和國家關係,除非,眼睛給喇仔肉糊到?
國家共識應該是強調雙邊關係的政策問題,特別是,越來越,跟隨重要的獨立國家外交政策和利益,或內部和外部的框架裡的團結;
所以,國家共識應該是追求多邊和雙邊關係,包括,承諾,共同促進團結,格外是,國家安全政策;
國家共識應該是增加雙邊關係的經濟和外交參與,同時,努力地,改善關係,而不是關閉兩個政府關係;
不可否認,自2008年以來中央政府一直努力來確保和追尋,繼續優先重視和中國的關係,但這不是歷史共識,能取代;
當然,今天,中國是台灣重要的貿易夥伴,所以,甚麼是夥伴關係呢?
可能認為台灣對中國的依賴會反映在雙邊協議和傷害達成共識的能力,其實,共識是追求和確保更廣泛的國家安全;
國家共識,應該是協調一致的努力以改善與中國的關係,特別是,夥伴關係;
除了其他事項之外,追尋好的雙邊關係,格外是,中國不應該再被看作統一或安全的威脅?
換句話說,共識是努力,也是國家戰略,包括,合作夥伴關係;
特別是,在相互信任和的基礎的合作,並且,談判一個新的夥伴關係與合作協議,不可否認,它應該是國家的主要目標;
國家共識是雙邊關係下,國家領導,持續以肯定的國家承諾和強烈的共同外交政策,其也強調,共識重要性,聲明願意為了改變國家目標和團結;
儘管如此,國家共識是確保和追尋繼續優先重視國家內部和外部的框架裡的團結和意見?

  二,不爽思維下的爭論發展
國家共識能夠作為面對全球安全威脅的原則;
特別是,2001年9月11日對美國的恐怖攻擊,所以,國家領導人應該採取,更積極的國家共識下的政策;
國家共識可以被憲法所理解,特別是,國土以外的經營,格外是,主導作用下,外交倡議;
畢竟,國家共識在國家安全和政策改變,可能,引發越來越多的爭議,以為親密關係在國家利益和不透明手段來實現;
但是,安全共識,往往證明是一個有自信的長期願望,和可靠的外交和安全政策,包括,全球合作夥伴;
建構一個共識,在很大程度上,需要承擔一個公平分享的理念;
特別是,確實性和國際合法性,缺乏國內共識是很難以精確定義的國家利益;
事實上,共識是承諾,或如,其它的國家利益;
換句話說,國家共識應該願意證明是滿足接觸在雙邊領域中國家利益;
不斷發展的國家共識討論,可能影響未來的政策
不可否認,有前途的國家安全共識是仰賴一個有朝氣的夥伴關係;
它們不是老掉牙的老掉牙的歴史,文化和哲學,等等;
全球同意,國家安全共識是共同達到領先地位和改善相互之間關係;
可能想像一個關鍵是表示期望增加合作和地位;
國家安全共識是代表一個巨大的轉變,確認國家外交政策的地緣全球政治現實;
簡單來說,在一個長期的國家承諾基礎,同時,尋求承擔積極角色,共同對抗新興安全威脅;
換句話說,國家安全共識是維持穩定和平的戰略任務;
自2008年以來,關係已經形成幾個關鍵條件;
或是說,安全政策的繼續發展,難怪,不爽和懷疑態度拉大距離;
國家安全共識是國家能力和意願進行改革,特別是,需要為它實行其承諾,格外是,面對強烈反對的影響;
即使,分歧依然存在.

  三,安全共識的國家利益:
平心而論,國家利益,追尋獨特的國家外交政策目標,特別是,要求安全共識,換句話說,它不是作為單方面的利益,所以,必須繼續行使安全共識;
因此,安全共識要求改革和加強團結和互信,同時,升級多邊的威脅反應和安全挑戰,特別是,安全共識是嚴格依循國際法進行,格外是,安全共識要求國會批准,執行和部署;
簡單來說,安全共識是展現框架和追尋國家基本承諾和維持雙邊政府利益,換句話說,尋求建構一個老實經紀人;
透過安全共識,實行安全政策的作戰計畫和預防和解決,穩定國家內部衝突,打擊全球恐怖主義,暴力極端歷史主義,等,另外,降低大規模殺傷性武器的擴散;
共識,也是不同的安全政策,發揮國家戰略的重要作用,特別是,中國;
共識,也採取強硬立場在國內的經濟和其他政策問題,畢竟,任何一方不可以將其意志強加於其他來降低政府影響力;
儘管如此,共識是戰略夥伴關係,無庸置疑;
格外是,尋求模式來面對政治和經濟參與;
難怪,中國和國民黨一貫奉行異口同聲的老掉牙的歴史倡議!

  四,新模式的安全共識在雙邊關係
安全共識,致力於整合和促進政治和經濟發展,特別是,願望;
自2008年以來,中央政府透過會議,開拓積極的作用在對話上;
但他們不相關於老掉牙的歷史,文化和哲學,等等,包括,數字和圖表;
重點是安全共識能夠被理解為基礎的願望,和平息恐懼重新崛起的中國,和強調好的優點;
安全共識,也是一個集體的安全和外交政策,展現追尋果斷的國家利益;
安全共識,也是互信和長期承諾,換句話說,承擔越來越重要的角色,包括,氣候變化政策,警察和司法合作,格外是,安全和防衛政策,等等;
安全共識是透過團結,互信和對話的倡議,建構一個協議和改革條約,其目的應該是取得有效力的作戰操作;
最後,安全共識是務實的模式,特別是,夥伴關係;
不可否認,在歷史上,夥伴關係早已廣泛被認為是國家推動力;
特別是整合;
安全共識是將繼續合作促進在雙邊關係內的共同利益;
另外是,管理,改善鄰居關係;
重點是,甚麼是老和新?
簡單來說,高度務實的態度,加強團結和繼續追尋量身定做的國家應對危機;
安全共識是將繼續提高國家的全球競爭力和願意保護未來的國家利益,特別是,對話下的夥伴關係;
其他需要注意的是:安全共識也是改善關係的機會;
雖然,有些人喜歡吹牛老掉牙名詞;
然而,共識將會出現一個活力,積極性的分享,確保傳統之間的經濟自由化,改革和擴大,格外是,堅持;

  五,共識擴展安全與防衛
平心而論,美國的說明是正確的;
共識是直接機制,並依據互信,提供一個空前未有的支持擴展;
雖然,民眾不清楚擴展的好處,但是,它帶來穩定和利益;
這不相關老掉牙的歷史,文化和哲學等等;
簡單來說,擴展是技術改變歷史;
共識也是正在進行的安全與防衛的辯論能力,特別是,擴展;
共識也是可以幫助帶來嚴格的政治要求,格外是,鄰居的經濟穩定;
所以,共識是廣泛的國內辯論擴大,首先,換句話說,一件好事;
共識也提供一個特權;
特別是,夥伴關係,提供一個替代的正式關係;
儘管,保持不爽態度,共同支持安全共識的努力,參與和擴展;
無論,不爽,安全共識是尋求果斷的國家行動;
畢竟安全共識是尋求國家安全與防衛的堅定支持者和集體努力;
同時,反擊新興的安全威脅;
簡單來說它是一種手段格外是加強危機管理和培訓能力
安全共識是政府承諾和部署,但不是取代,所以要特別小心;
為此,安全共識是主張政府之間的正式協議,這使得在作戰行動中,運用國家能力和資源,避免重複和浪費;
雖然,有些人會擔心,可能降低國家影響力,不過,重點是省錢.

  新模式的台灣安全共識結論:
平心而論,有前途的安全共識,還是建立在一個夥伴關係,和有所改善政府之間的關係,來表示期望增加合作地位,是以,它是一個關鍵;
畢竟,國家共識代表轉型和確定國家政策的地緣政治現實;
共識在一個長期的承諾基礎,終結歷史,同時,尋求承擔積極的角色;不可否認,它是必要的,在未來,共同對抗新興安全威脅;
簡單來說,它是團結和互信,部署,維持和平與穩定;
國家能力和意願,進行改革,特別是需要共識,履行其承諾和強調蓬勃發展的安全;
共識強調關係,已經形成關鍵要素,格外是,不是距離;
雖然,不爽依然存在.

 

New moder of Taiwan security common concept

 

1,

According with any of global governments,and their leaders have supported and increasingly sought to the development common security policy,including,partnership.Because of they are not related to very older of history,culture,and philosophy,so on.
Simply put,common consensus are common security policy and national relationship.Unless,eyes has been driving insane.
National common consensus should emphasize the bilateral relation of policy issues.In particular,more and more to follow independently of national foreign policy and interest,or,both within outside the framework unity.
So,national common consensus should seek multilateral and bilateral relations,including,commitments,in order to work together to advance unity.Especially,national security policy.
National common consensus should increase bilateral relation in the economic and diplomatic engagement;in a while,an effort to improve relations,not close two of government's relations.
It cannot denied that,since 2008,central government has consistently ensured to seek that continues to prioritize relations with China.But,this is not historical common consensus which it can substituted.Of course,today,China is Taiwan's the most important trading partner,so,what is the partnership?
It may argue that Taiwan's dependence on China,in which,its relfect on  bilateral agreements,and hurt ability to reach consensus.In fact,consensus seeks and safe more wider national security.
National common consensus should make a concerted effort to improve with China's relation.In particular,particularship.Among other things,to seek as well as bilateral relation,especially,China should not be viewed as a threat to unity or security.
In other words,consensus is effort,also,is the national strategy,including,cooperative partnership,in particular,its based on mutual trust and cooperation.By the way,to negotiating a new partnership and cooperative agreement.It cannot dennied that it should be primary goals during its nation.
National common consensus is under the bilateral relation of national leader continue to assert their promise to a strong foreign policy.And its also emphasizes that importance of consensus,which demonstrating a willingness to change national goals and unities.

Nonetheless,national common consensus is consistently ensured to seek that continues to prioritize both within outside the framework unities and opinions.

2,Under the concept of out of sort,developing debate

National common consensus as meet global security threats have been principle,in particular,since the terrorist attacks against the United
States on September 11, 2001.So,national leaders should take more proactive national common consensus of policy.
National common consensus can understood to be constitutionally,in particular,barred from managing outside of territory.Especially,to leading role in diplomatic initiatives.
After all,what national common consensus change in national security and policy may lead more and more debates over closer relation in national interests,and non-transparent means to achieve them.
But,secure consensus have tended to a affirmative long-standing desire,and conceivable foreign and security policy,including,global partner.
A consensus establish largely need to believe a clear share of idea.In particular,credibility and international legitimacy,that a lack of domestic consensus has been tough on precisely defined national interests.
Indeed,or as other national interests,consensus is as a commitment.
In other words,national common consensus should  be more willing to prove,that engagement as satisfying national interests in the bilateral relation area.
The developing national common consensus discussion may be increasingly influence policy for the future.
It cannot denied that the promising a national security consensus fastened in a revitalized partnership.They are very older of history,culture,and philosophy,so on.
Global agree that national security consensus that working together to reach in the lead-up,and relations between each other have improved.
It may imagine that,as a key,have voiced expectations for increased cooperation on the position.
National security consensus is a represented gigantean shifts,in the geopolitical globe realities that has defined national foreign policy.
Simply put,in a long-standing national commitment,in a while,seeking to believe the proactive role,in order to working together to confront emerging security threats.
In other words,National security consensus is kept in stabilization,peacekeeping of strategic missions.
Since 2008,relations have been shaped by several key conditions.Or said that secure policy continues to develop.No wonder out of sort and skeptical is widening gap.
National security consensus are national ability and willingness to reform,in particular,necessary for it to meet its commitments;especially,to meet the influence of strong opposition.
In spite of differences between each other remain.

3,National interests of the secure consensus

Obviously speaking,national interests did seeks distinct national foreign policy objectives,in particular,ask for the secure consensus.In other words,it is not as unilateral interest.So,it has continued to exercise secure consensus.
Therefore,the secure consensus has sought to reform and strengthen the unity and confidence,in a while,to upgrading multilateral responses to security challenges and threats.In particular,the secure consensus is to be pursued in strict accordance with international law.Especially,the secure consensus is required approval by Congress,in which,to execute and deploy.
Simply put,they can be observed as national fundamental commitment to the framework as embodied by the secure consensus;and held bilateral governments interests.In other words,seeking to establish a honest broker.
Through the secure consensus,achieve the security policy operation,and  inter-nation conflict prevention and settlement,stabilization;the struggle against global terrorism,violence historical extremism,and so on;in addition,reducing the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
Also,consensus distincts from security policy,in order to play national strategy of important role.In particular,China.
Also,consensus takes a stronger stand on domestic economic and other policy issues. After all,neither side can impose its will on the other,that reduce central government's influence.
Nonetheless,consensus is strategic partnership.It is without doubt that it does exist.Especially,seeks partners to meet political and economic engagement.
No wondwer China and KMT have consistently pursued very older history initiatives.

4,New moder of secure consensus in the bilateral relations.

Secure consensus commitment to the integration,and reconcile with political and economic development. In particualr,desire.
Since 2008,central government through which to "organizations" shape proactive role on dialogue.But,they are not related to very older of history,culture,and philosophy,so on.Including,members and charts.
The focus is,secure consensus can understood as based in a desire,and calm fear of a resurgent China,and stress as well as benefits.
Also,secure consensus is a collective security and foreign policy,in order to seek national intersets assertively.
Also,secure consensus is confidence and long-standing commitment.On the other hand,that has assumed an increasingly significant role,including,climate change policy,police and judicial cooperationespecially,security and defense policy,and so on.
Secure consensus is through unity,confodence,and dialogue,in order to establish a agreement and reform treaty,in which,to get operation more effectively.
Finally,secure consensus is more pragmatic pattern,particularly,partnership.
It cannot denied that,on history,partnership has widely been
considered the driving national force.Particularly,integration.
Secure consensus will continue to cooperate,and to advance joint interests in the bilateral relations.On the other hand,managing and improving relations with neighbors.
This focus is,what are definitions between old and new?Simply put,highly pragmatic of an attitude,at the same time, they have enhanced unity,and continued to seek tailored national responses to the crisis.
Secure consensus will continue to increase national global competitiveness,and willingness to protect national interests for the future.In particular,under the dialogue of partnership.
Others note that,also,Secure consensus is an opportunity for improved relations.Although,some of people are ofter enjoy touted as very older of phrase.
However,consensus will appear to share an enthusiasm,dynamic,in which,ensure that traditional between economic liberalization,reform and enlargement.Especially,persist it.

5,Consensus will enlarge security and defense.

Obviously speaking,the explanation of the U.S.is exactly right;consensus was based on the confidence that followed an unparalleled mechanism to support enlargement.
Although,further enlargement are not so clear to many people,but,it will bring bringing stability and interests,and they are not related to very older of history,culture,and philosophy,so on.Simply put,enlargement is that technology change history.
Also,consensus is an ongoing debate on security and defense capacities,especially,enlargement.
Also,consensus can help bring some of the stringent political requirements,in particular,economic stability of the
neighborhood.
So,consensus will be the broader domestic debate on enlargement. At first.In other words,as a good thing.
Also,consensus have supported a privilege;in particular,partnership,in order to offering as an alternative to full relationship.
Despite a persistently out of sort,that work together to support secure consensus of the effort,engagement and enlargement.
Neither out of sort that secure consensus will seek decisive of national action.
After all,secure consensus will seek strong supporter and work collectively of national security and defense;at the same time,to counter emerging security threats. Simply put,it is a mean.Especially,emphasis on boosting crisis management and training capacity.
Secure consensus are central government's commitment and deployment,but,not substitutable.So,it is particularly careful.
To this end,secure consensus will advocate formal agreements between both of sides,that operate national capabilities and resoures for operations in which,avoid duplication and waste.
Although,some of people concerned that may be weaken national  influence,but,the focus will be save money.

colusion:

Obviosly speaking,the promising secure consensus will be still establish a partnership,and relations between the both of sides have improved,in order to voiced expectations for increased cooperative status.As said that it is as a key.
After all,national consensus represented transforms,and in the geopolitical realities that had defined national policy.
Consensus is in a long-standing commitment to end of history,at the same time,to seeking to believe the more proactive role.It cannot denied that it is necessary to work together to confront emerging security threats for the future.
Simply put,they are unity and confidence,and deployed in peacekeeping, stabilization.
National ability and willingness to attempt  reforms,in particular,necessary for consensus to meet its commitments,and stress burgeoning security.

Consensus emphasizes relations that have been shaped by several key conditions.Especially,not distance.Although,out of sort can be remain. 

 

 

 

 

 

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()