窮小子冷眼輯

蔡英文說想一想:呂前副總統秀蓮女士說國家作戰實力
Copyrighted by 台灣窮小子 to 蔡英文和呂前副總統秀蓮女士

引用來源如下:http://www.ettoday.net/news/20120918/103933.htm
有文誌有真相:釣魚台之爭恐成軍事之戰　呂秀蓮：我們實力夠嗎？

布衣小子,透過個人文誌和呂前副總統 秀蓮女士報告:

首先,肯定,呂前副總統 秀蓮女士的納悶:我們實力夠嗎?不可否認,確實不足!

布衣小子真的很笨,但笨能補拙,幾十年過去了;

我們還要再死捧歷史文化的神主牌嗎?

親愛的:呂前副總統 秀蓮女士 您說對不對呢?

國家願景是甚麼?不僅是國家技術創新,同時,也是全國民眾一起來反擊,極端歷史與文化暴力主義和恐怖主義;

當然爾,還是有圖有真相;

美國的論述有理!

全球戰略指導原則,重整過時的國際法,我們共同來因應未來的區域威脅與危機!

National war-fighting force is to integrate national industries and technologies of joint operation,which are not related to history,culture and philosophy.
Simply put,the PRC and the Japan will be probably to  fire mailitary conflicts off,or not?Why? It should not be ? The PRC will be probably to get success,will not be?In other words,how much money will spend?
So,what about the ROC?Because of island history,culture and philosophy have spoken so much,and for a long time.
There  are absolutely no strategic thinking capabilities are to establish national defense industries for prospective and deployment.
So,as issue of 呂前副總統秀蓮女士 was exactly right.
Today's historical dispution is ridicule,yet,it may become battlefield,but if it will be, China will be really win the desire?
We opened the past of history,which have shown that Japan was use as intelligent superiority to build war fighter technology,especially,military spirit,which they have destroyed the Ching fleet.
So,what the historical signal was to show? Because of war fighter technology and military spirit turned into nation's for core concept,which are not related to history,culture and philosophy,even,ancestral tablets' - Mao Zedong.
So,although,as Japan is no longer military greater nation,but they have been passed down for national military spirit .
So,what the China own ? Ancestral tablets' - Mao Zedong. I said.
National war fighter technology and military spirit are still national superiority.
These are not related to history,culture and philosophy,even,ancestral tablets' - Mao Zedong.
National superiority of value is military spirit ,nor technological copying,perhaps that it is the true of decisive engagement.
Ttechnological copying might be only likely to Pandora's box,but if it did not open ,nobody can decide whether they will be as valuable.
Especually,Japan is open,and with their mind to review weaknesses,so what the ROC own? Sophistry.I said.
It had just remembered that  the Soviet Pacific fleet was through Tsushima Strait in 1995 - imposing on magnificent.
But the U.S. Seventh Fleet ,platforms, and its capabilities and superiorities are to offset imposing on magnificent.Why?
So,as national war-fighting force is technological spirit-profession are managing military,mastering material,especially,managing superiority.
These are not related to history,culture and philosophy,even,ancestral tablets' - Mao Zedong.
Simply put,they are natuonal standred.
Do not forget Japan's constitution - forever renounces war .
So,I am using that 蔡英文 has said that :"let's think about it".
What about our constitution is to say ?
Eventually,historical joke as only posturing.
So,as we are think about that what on earth the National war-fighting force will be?

  

國家作戰實力是整合國家產業與技術的聯合作戰;

這類是不相關於歷史,化與哲學;

簡單來說,中華人民共和國和日本,能引爆軍事衝突嗎?

應該不會,為甚麼?中華人民共和國可能會取得勝利嗎?

換句話說,花多少錢呢?

那中華民國台灣呢?布衣小子說:Kissed that good bye.

因為島嶼歷史,文化與哲學,說太多,也很久了;

全然沒有策略思考能力,作未來的國家國防工業的部署與前瞻;

是以呂前副總統秀蓮女士的問題是正確;

今天的歷史爭議是笑話,即使,可能會是戰場?

但如果是?中國真的達成願望嗎?

打開過去的歷史來說明:日本以智慧優勢來建立作戰技術,格外是,軍隊鬥志,其曾經摧毀大清艦隊;

這歷史信號說明甚麼?

作戰技術和軍隊鬥志是以國家為核心思維;

這類不相關於歷史,文化與哲學,甚至,毛澤東神主牌;

是以

日本雖然不再是軍事大國,但傳承國家軍隊鬥志,所以,中國有甚麼呢?我說:毛澤東神主牌;

國家作戰技術,軍隊鬥志,才是國家優勢;

這類不相關於歷史,文化與哲學,甚至,毛澤東神主牌;

國家優勢的價值是軍隊鬥志,而不是技術範本,或才是真正的決戰;

技術範本可能僅是如潘朵拉的盒子,不打開,沒人能夠確定是否有用?

格外是,日本是開放的,虛心地檢討自己的缺點,是以,中華民國台灣有甚麼呢?我說:狡辯;

嘗記得,1995年蘇聯太平洋艦隊通過對馬海峽-氣勢雄壯;

但是,美國第七艦隊,其能力和優勢抵消氣勢雄壯,為什麼?

是以國家作戰實力是技術精神-專業管理軍隊,掌握物流,尤其是,優勢經營;

這類不相關於歷史,文化與哲學,甚至,毛澤東神主牌;

簡單來說,國家標準;

不要忘記日本國憲法-永遠放棄戰爭;

那以蔡英文說:我們來想一想:我們的憲法說甚麼?

最後,歷史笑話,或僅是故作姿態;

是以,想一想:國家作戰實力到底是甚麼?

分格線
平心而論,蔡英文也不了解這類學理,因為政經學院鮮少說這類!

是以,布衣小子能想像蔡英文的作戰團隊,沒啥戰力?難怪,美國與中共聽不下去?唉!

其實,呂前副總統秀蓮女士,人真的好,還是幫忙蔡英文!所以,戰術重點是甚麼呢?

終結歷史,打破對立,我們一起來反擊暴力歷史與文化極端主義和恐怖主義!共同面對區域海洋威脅!

不可否認,此類不了解?說甚麼國家漁權呢?