窮小子冷眼輯

引述來源如下:http://www.iing.tw/2012/09/blog-post_3290.html
民進黨黨慶，蔡英文：反省為我們帶來重生的力量 9/27/2012

反省一詞,應該是叫作:Reflection,當然耳,也是有圖有真相;也是以蔡英文的貓,我們來想一想,甚或,反省?

 
中國與台灣的歷史,文化與哲學,曾幾何時有過反省與承擔責任呢?布衣小子說:沒有!全然不!

所以說:反省一詞是甚麼?真的很簡單!

終結歷史,打破對立,我們一起來反擊暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義,建構一個我們的安全空間!

反省是腦力激盪和思考來了解自己和他人!

Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子給蔡英文
其實,反省是一種選擇,可能聽起來很古怪;
畢竟,我不是神經科醫師,或許,可以請教柯文哲醫師;
是以,反省是腦力激盪的運作;
那今天,還是以蔡英文的貓來猜測:反省是腦力激盪和思考;
這完全不相關於歷史,文化與哲學;
因為我相信,終結歷史是未來的突破和反省在過去;
特別是,在未來,將會引爆更好的理解機制,格外是,思考進程;
反省將不會是一個困難的理解,但將會是許多的期望和給于我們;
我認為,反省,能夠幫助達到終結歷史的認識,也將有助於未來;
因為反省是有用的,明確的作戰計畫;
這是完全不相關於歷史,文化與哲學;
簡單來說,反省是可以理解的,終結歷史的主題;
不可否認,反省是很老的問題,其解決方案也不是很多人知道;
但是,反省能夠被假設來發現,是與否的作戰解決方案;
因為,反省是說明一類信念在未來-終結歷史是有效的論述;
這其實是偉大的國家政治與軍事哲學的戰略定義;
而除此之外,反省,也是安慰我們無法達成的真實的現象-獨立;
是以許多老問題,在技術上是困難的,但反省是給我們一個簡單的狀態和理解-終結歷史;
因此,終結歷史是可能的,一些非常老,又未能解決的問題,在不可預期的國家原則基礎上;
也許,反省的範圍是有限的,但是,腦力激盪將是無限期地持續下去,可能會發現新的未來視域-終結歷史;
布衣小子猜測蔡英文說反省的戰略定義

Reflections on the brainstorming and thinking to understand oneself and other.
In fact,reflection is a option,that may sound like nuts,and after all,I am not a neurologist,perhaps we can ask for advice to Dr.柯文哲.So,as reflection is in operatings of the brainstorming.
What I still using 蔡英文 of cat is guessing,today,reflections are brainstorming and thinking.
These are absolutely not history,culture,and philosophy.Because of I believe that ending of history will penetrate in the future,and reflection was in the past ; in particular,it will fire off the better understanding of the mechanisms,especially,the processes of thought for the future.
Reflections will not be a tough understanding,that will be many to desire for,and will give us some ideas.
I think that reflections can help in reaching ending of history this understanding,also,will help in the future.
Because of reflections are useful,clear of war-fighting operation.
These are absolutely not history,culture,and philosophy.
Simply put,reflections are understandable ending of history to the subject.
It cannot denied that reflections are very old problems,and also,whose solutions are not
known.
But,reflections can be assumed that,finally,yes or no war-fighting solutions would be
found.
Because of reflections have shown that such a belief is in the future - ending of history is valid statement.
This fact are of great national politics and military philosophy of strategic significance.
And beyond that,also,reflections can be sort of consolation for our inability of real phenomena-independence.
As many very old problems are technically complicated, but,it gives us one one that is simple to express and understand - ending of history.
So,ending of history is possible that some of very old and still
unresolved problems are in principle unexpected on the basis of our nation.
Perhaps the  scope of reflections are limited,but,brainstorming will continue indefinitely,and may find new vision for the future-ending of history.
布衣小子 is being guessed strategic significance of reflections by 蔡英文 said.

分格線

民進黨僅是1986年才蹦出來!本來就沒有歷史大便!
看看中共,其實,中南海也想改?但可能是找死,不過,如果不改?那真的是等死,自此以後,可能被歷史洪流所淹沒!
因為,找死還有一個戰略定義是置諸死地而後生!或才能有未來!
大家來想一想:對不對呢?

 

布衣小子,也恭賀民進黨生日快樂!也是有圖有真相!
少說點島嶼歷史與文化,明天真的會更好!

DPP is ours partner,not adversary: http://kudou543.pixnet.net/blog/post/36644792

笨小子瞄民進黨感想篇

Copyrighted  by 台灣窮小子 

序言:
眼瞥,諸如,世代交替或薪火交傳等名詞,頓時浮起諸多無奈;

話說,中共和國民黨,甚至,美國共和,民主兩黨,尚且扯不上?是以關民進黨啥事呢?

然所謂"老將",更應該率先"終結歴史","打破對立",不是死捧神主牌;

話說,神主牌還有戰略思考能力嗎?

本文開始:

不可否認,敗選的情緒,反映在民進黨;

在內部,可能有許多的納悶和質疑,甚,至思考中國關係和未來的危機;

其實,簡單來說,或如,布衣小子曾言:終結歴史,打破對立,夥伴關係,進軍北京;

未來是一個雙贏趨勢,這也不相關老掉牙的統一和獨立;

換句話說:互信下,夥伴關係,穩定共處;

民進黨是一個年輕政黨,應該有一個雙贏的政治邏輯;

這也不相關於老掉牙的島嶼歴史,狹隘文化和不倫不類的哲學;

簡單來說,未來的戰略前瞻和視域?

透過建構安全夥伴關係和終結歴史阻礙,不爽也將成為動力;

這是共同努力,共同成長;

重要的夥伴關係來自好的政治邏輯和豐富的經濟發展;

我相信,未來是集中在互惠互利的夥伴關係,避免衝突;

面對全球經濟危機,不可否認,這很困難地,說明互利關係;

特別是,對中國不爽,理所當然,也將看成對台灣不利;

其實,這是錯誤的政治邏輯;

對抗和緊張關係,解決不了問題,夥伴關係,能夠坐下來談;

它是框架,不是原則;

反之,未來戰略思考能力來判斷相互之間的關係;

試圖,共同努力,聯合作戰下夥伴關係,將如何改變政治模式和危機?

回顧過去的幾十年,或感覺,或瞄,或瞥,國家的未來視域,是和全球政治和經濟趨勢是緊密地糾纏;

這是不論,過去,現在和未來,特別是,戰略前瞻;

然而,政治邏輯的共同點是:如何在危機中,面對僵局,特別是,預測保持和美國,中國關係;

端視,幾十年來歴史邏輯是美麗的謊話,格外是,面對危機;

它不會,也不能夠,保護我們的國家和民眾;

所以,積極的和雙贏的政治邏輯,可能發生轉變,簡單來說:終結歴史;

因為歴史邏輯是缺乏國家競爭力,特別是,老掉牙的統一和獨立,不是國家繁榮的代名詞;

穩定的夥伴關係才是,是以美國說的正確:我們是夥伴;

因為歴史邏輯也是沉重的負擔和冷血殺手;

我們永遠看不到國家繁榮,而且,還會被拖累,不要狡辯,這也是歴史事實;

因為,歴史邏輯經常欺騙我們,特別是,三民主義統一中國,或是,中國是社會主義模式,這就是謊話;

平心而論,在下個四年裡,邏輯和不和諧可能增加,或是,沒有競爭在國家爭論;

事實上,它是不對,因為他們可能僅是指示分離和顛覆;

未來的視域將是一個長期趨勢,作為一個有遠見的反應,同時,這也國家改變在全球戰略平衡,調整和面對全球危機的影響;

簡單來說,面對中國興起;

歴史邏輯的神話地位,不再是理所當然,未來的夥伴關係是優勢地位,或美國,或日本,等等;

因為不可能再回到1949年;

平心而論,一個改變是夥伴關係下的全球戰略思維;

所以,尋求共同努力來強化夥伴關係,同時,致力於加強國家的區域軍事能力;

這是未來的國家戰略規劃;

國家夥伴關係是長期性的合作與競爭要素,是以很有可能會是未來的全球政治模式;

在過去幾十年歴史邏輯的象徵已經過去了;

國家夥伴關係是強化全球的共同利益的驅動程式,特別是,核心利益;

國家夥伴關係是未來的國家戰略規劃,創造真正的在地經濟模式;

不可否認,它是一個前景,因為它能夠打擊越來越多的老掉牙勢力;

總之,小子本布衣,布衣希望被證明是正確的;

因為,歴史邏輯的神話地位不再是理所,當然,國家夥伴關係是未來的國家戰略規劃;

旦來自台灣,一個窮小子,也希望國家夥伴關係是被證明是錯誤?

所以,民進黨了解嗎?

分隔線

Article is beginning:
It cannot denied that defeat votes is reflected on the DPP.
In the inside,it may have many of wonder and questioning,even,think about with China's relation,and future crisis.
In fact,simply speaking,as 布衣小子 has already said that :
"End of hostory ; Break confrontation ; Partnership ; Move into Beijing".
The future is a dual-win trend,which are related to very old of unity and independence.In other words,under the confidence,partnership is living together in stability.
The DPP is a young political party,which should have a dual-win political logic.They are not related to very oldest of Island history,narrow-minded of culture,and non-descript philosophy.Simply put,the future of strategic perspective and vision?
By through,establishing secure partnership and end of historical obstruction,that the out of sort will become power,and it will be working and growing together.Great partnership come with great political logic,and great economic development.
I believe that future focuses on the mutually beneficial economic partnersahip,and avoid conflict.
To meet global economy crisis.It cannot denied that it has been tough to explain relationship as mutually beneficial.In particular,what is out of sort for China,so,of course,that will be seen as stupid for Taiwan.As the matter of fact,it is wrong of political logic.
Confrontations and tensions cannot straighten out the issue.
Partnership can make us to dialogue.Because it is framework,but,not principle.
Contrariously,the future of strategic deliberation ability to judge interrelationship.
We attempted to working together under the partnership of joint operation,and how will change political pattern and criese.
Look back decades in the past,as feeling,or as look at ,and set sight and on something else.The global politics and economics are as deeply convoluted with national vision for the future.
No matter what past,now and future,in particular,strategic perspective.
The sum of political logic that how will meet deadlock in the crisis?In particular, the prediction and keeping are relations with U.S. and China.
According in decades,historic logic is pretty lie.Especially,meet crises,neither,it cannot save our nation and people.
So,the positive and dual-political logic may bring about return.Simply put,end of history.
Because historic logic is lack of national competitiveness.In particular,very oldest of unity and independence,in which,not a code word of national prosperous.
Stable of partnership will still be.So,as U.S. has said that it is exactly right.
we are pals.
Because historic logic are also heaviest load,and cold-blood killer.We will not be never to see national prosperous in the future,in addition,that will be a burdened on it.Do not sophistry,and it is also historical fact.
Because historic logic usually cheat on us,in particular,three Principles of the People will unify China.Or as the future of China will be socialism pattern.Honestly speaking,these are lies.Why? What will be new era of national pattern,as followed:
Obviously speaking,over the next four years,logics and disaffirmations may increase discord,or no competition within nation as argument.In fact.it is not right.Because they may be only a indication for separation and subversion.
The future vision will be a presented as a far-sighted reaction to long-term trends,in a while,it also explain that nation changes in the global balance-strategic,and adjust and meet impact of of the global crisis.
Simply put,to meet China rising,the myth position of historic logic can no longer be taken for granted. Of course,the future of partnership will be preeminence,as U.S.or Japan,etc.
Because it could not be back to 1949,20century.
Obviously speaking,a change will be global strategic concept under the partnership.
So,we seek that working together to strengthen partnsrship,at the same time, strengthen nation own regional military ability.
This will be a national strategic-program for the future.
National partnetship will be long-term confitions of cooperation and competition.As it may be glonal politic pattern for the future.
Over the past many of decades,historic logic of symbol is over.National partnetship will be strengthening of common interests between the globe drive powers. In particular,core benefit.
National partnetship will be a national strategic-program for the future,which in the creation of truly local economy pattern.
It cannot denied that it is a prospect.Because it can attack,increasingly,very oldest of rival.
To sum up,小子本布衣 will be hoped to be proved exactly right.Because the myth position of historic logic can no longer be taken for granted. National partnetship will be a national strategic-program for the future,but,came from Taiwan,a 窮小子,also,will hope National partnetship to be proved incorrect.
So,does DPP understanding,or not?