窮小子冷眼輯

Ass - Dummy - Itch - Zaftig

WHY NEW MODEL OF CHINA'S DREAM,AND WE HEARD THAT FEELING OUT-OF-SORT?
DEFYING IS SAFER MODEL FROM OF ENDING STUPID OF HISTORY AND CULTURE
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子DEC 1st 0600am

Infact,the establishment of global ADIZ have approximately set up since the 1950s,including the United States and Japan with other countries,so on.
But,China's ADIZ is copyied from stupid of history and culture,therefore,others countries oppose and respond that this is reasonable.Simply put,it is irritation.
At least,in the global vision,ADIZ is international airspace of transparency.For example,such as the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration has a clear definition in ADIZ,but,China is not.
It is quite an interesting,on Nov. 25,it flew two U.S. B-52 bombers,but,without informing China.
In other words,China is in doing so,that may be learned U.S.,and to shift into institutional Chinese characteristics,but,ignored stupid of history and culture-challenging the United States.
I believe that this can be inspired by an new organization - China National Security Committee,unfortunately,and used as stupid of history will establish war-fighting systems and strategies to ensure national security.
It cannot denied that ADIZ may be a useful,but they have forgotten historical experiences and lessons,indeed,China's biggest unsafe and threat came from northwest and domestic history-culture violence extremism and terrorism,rather than, southeast.So,perhaps ADIZ is ineffective model.
Learning US model,the critical should be the model of ending of history with national representation,rather than,stupid of history and culture.Simply put,a word of fight and win wars means that a cigarette throws gasoline ; security change by push.Rather than,ridiculous slogan.
So-called ADIZ is not worth,and focus on national transparency,in particular,national experience,to foster secure power.New model pf national force may be as well,rather than,stupid of history and culture.
As slogan of China's dream should show clearly that we learned the US - ENDING OF HISTORY,in which,in order to achieve China's prosperity and peoples' happiness,rather than,stupid of history and culture.
In other words,this model does not suit China,if you do not want to ending of history.
This is a sense of national history and culture that ending of history is great power and come with great responsibility,and how people like their own Nation,rather than,stupid of history and culture.

 新模式的中國夢為什麼聽起來我們很不爽
終結是蔑視糟糕的歷史與文化的安全模式
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 DEC 1st 0600AM

其實,全球ADIZ的建立,大概是起自20世紀50年代,美國日本等國家;
但是,中國的ADIZ是抄襲來自糟糕的歷史與文化,因此,其他國家反對與反應是有道理的,簡單來說,它是挑釁;
ADIZ,至少,在全球視域是具有透明性的國際空域;
或如:美國FAA有明確說明在防空識別,但是,中國沒有;
有趣的是,11月25日兩架兩個美國B-52轟炸機飛過,並沒有知會中國!
換句話說,中國這樣做時,可能是學習美國,以轉換成具有中國特色的制度;
卻忽略了糟糕的歷史與文化-挑戰美國!
我認為這是來自新組織的啟示-中國國家安全委員會,並以糟糕的歷史與文化,建立,確保國家安全的作戰系統與策略;
不可否認,ADIZ可能是有用的,但是,已經遺忘歷史經驗與教訓;
其實,中國最大的危險與威脅是來自西北與國內暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義,而不是東南方;
所以,ADIZ,或許是一個沒有效益的模式!
學習美國模式,關鍵應該是國家性格化的終結歷史模式,而不是糟糕的歷史與文化;
簡單來說,打勝仗一詞是一根香菸,丟入汽油桶,以驅動安全改變,而不是笑話的口號!
所謂的ADIZ並不是不好,重點是國家透明性,特別是,國家歷練,以培養安全實力;
新模式的國家實力,也是如此,而不是糟糕的歷史與文化!
是以,中國夢的口號應該是清楚地說明我們學習美國-終結歷史,以實現中國的國家繁榮與民眾幸福,而不是糟糕的歷史與文化!
換句話說,如果不終結歷史,這模式不適合中國?
這是一個國家歷史與文化意義,終結歷史是偉大的力量與責任,民眾喜歡他們的國家,而不是糟糕的歷史與文化!