窮小子冷眼輯

【蔡英文說想想】
【務實的經濟策略部署來處理台灣】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 OCT 8 2015 

1，【NOTE】:
I AM GOING TO TO PLEAD WITH YOU , DO NOT CROSS US.
BECAUSE IF YOU DO , THE SURVIVORS WILL WRITE ABOUT WHAT WE DO HERE FOR 10,000 YEARS.
BEING THOUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES GEN.JAMES.MATTIS

2，【NOTE】:洪榮一先生說務實

How to carry on Taiwan's Economy.

When I was in the 1970s, I greatly appreciated,and I had the rare opportunity to learn from Taiwan's Mr.Wang Jin-pyng and China's Mr.Fang.

Each taught me how to make big questions in very different model of the mathematics and physics.

However,challenge I was taking an exam on 38 grades of the mathematics ,but Mr.Wang Jin-pyng had always been smiling,who made my brain-spaces bigger and richer, to dig deeper into the National political and military themes,to make more deployments.

For instance,learning for a history of what we had learned from the mathematics,the questions had changed,and we were used to maximize the mathematics.

Besides, Mr.Fang had extensive China's experience as a had extensive experience physicist,on the other hand,he once was Chinese the chief scientist.

I recall they had said that we must focus exclusively on the concrete decision around the corner to realize every detail surrounding it.

Taiwan made a big problem out of the unstable status for history and culture,and lacked of the future deployment of the National Economic relatoions.

In response,history and culture made Taiwan feel that the broad picture was a distraction ; they wanted to focus on texts ,who of what they have never needed to decide at the moment.

Indeed,there are experienced and adventurous,two of models of looking at the Globe,rather than history and culture.

I saw DPP's policy through only history and culture lens,and they did not want decisions to be added in long-term strategy.

Although history and culture had their advantages, but for each decision on the policy,depending on the superiority and challenge at hand.

I kept "we are not turning" in mind when DPP thinking about an important decision facing over the next for the future.

If should we support the inclusion of the China,that we should be waiting another few years until China establishes independence and freedom matures.

The future of history and culture sounds like a narrow question, and in theory,thay did not have dealt with that tactical model.

But I believe that the framework of the Ending of history should be enlarged, and it should be a much broader , general global strategic deployment ; in other words,in this instance DPP cannot be turning.

Here are three " hollows" to keep in mind,the US of a General Douglas MacArthur said.

First,the Taiwan's National Economy was established by all of the Taiwanese,which is a Taiwanese-made National property comprised of a basket,rather than history and culture.

In fact, nothing history and culture does can confer real global status on the National economy.

That said, when the National economy is the composition,and it is pushed to a higher status and level of respectability,and it confers good of

Taiwanese management for Taiwan's financial system.

Of course,today,China is a major force in the global economy,but China is not ready.

Put simply,history and culture are not enough,above all,Taiwan's market must be reliably open,and in addition to China lacks of freedom and independence of conditions exist in now.

To achieve open Taiwan's economic system,which such will be obligated to permit against history and culture,in particular,we deny the government prop them up.

With regard to Tsai Ing-wen's Economic reform,it is critical that solidly and openly regulated,in particular,remove Left-wing of history and culture,including Economy/

To be sure,DPP is moving in transformative directions,and has also instituted many important reforms.Going further is its stated goal,as well,which only wants in now and the future.

So, how should the Taiwan proceed?

Indeed,a narrow view of history and culture have always ask the question whether China is partner, or not?

Put simply,forget about whether how pretty history and culture,since they lack of National enthusiasm,which makes people will surely stay away.

As DPP take a much powerful stance, saying that Taiwan not only must specific reforms proceed,and we must change - the broader Taiwanese Homeland systrm.

I think history and culture will be a mistake,for them will not do justice to National Oligarch interests.

Ending of history is a broader, more strategic National Economic Deployment.

There is a prominent opportunity that if I proposes to Taiwan End,and it will act as an incentive because history and culture lack of full preparation for freedom and independence.

Finally, dealing with Taiwan's Economy should be seen in the National prospection for the future of National financial system, in which Taiwanese will become a major participant ; Ending of history is inevitable.

It will be a significant accomplishment for the Taiwan to create a Global blueprint for the future.

Framing the strategic and tactical deployment the right way

History and culture are too small,we will be miss completely question ; if make them too big,that Taiwanese drown in "BIG WORDS".

【PRAGMATIC ECONOMIC STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT FOR DEALING WITH TAIWAN】

如何處理好台灣經濟？

當我在二十世紀七零年代，我非常感激台灣的王金平先生與中國方先生，一個難得的學習機會；

每個教我如何在數學與物理不同的模式，設計重大問題；

雖然，我的挑戰是數學三十八分，但是，王金平先生總是笑嘻嘻，

讓我的頭腦空間更大，更豐富，與更深入地研究國家軍事與政治主題，並提出更多的部署！

舉例來說，我們從數學中，如何在問題發生改變後，學習到歷史，與最大限度地利用數學；

另外是，方先生擁有豐富的中國經驗，作為一個傑出的物理學者，在另一方面，他曾經是中國首席科學家！

我記得他們曾經說過，我們必須完全專注於身邊，並了解周圍的每一個環節的具體決定！

台灣犯了一個大問題是不穩定的歷史與文化狀況，以及缺乏國家經濟關係的未來部署；

對此，歷史與文化讓台灣認為總體是分心的，他只想專注於課文，從來不需要決戰時刻；

其實，注視全球有兩類模式－經驗與經歷，而不是歷史與文化！

台灣窮小子瞥民進黨的政策，僅是透過歷史與文化的鏡頭，並沒有決定加入長期性策略；

雖然，歷史與文化有它的優點，但是，對政策的每個決定，這取決於手上掌握的優勢與挑戰；

台灣窮小子認為，如果民進黨在未來，面臨一個重要的決定，保持我們不要轉彎的初衷；

如果，支持加入中國，那還是應該主張再等幾年，直到中國建立成熟的自由與獨立；

在歷史與文化的未來，聽起來是一個狹隘的問題，從理論來說，它們沒有能夠運用的戰術模式；

但我相信終結歷史的框架應該擴大；

它應該是對台灣更廣泛，更普遍的全球性戰略部署；

換句話說，在這種情況下，民進黨不能轉彎！

美國麥克阿瑟將軍說：有三個空心，需要牢記；

首先，台灣的國家經濟是由台灣人建立，這是是一個全面性國家資產在一個籃子，而不是歷史與文化！

事實上，沒有什麼歷史與文化確，實可以賦予國家經濟真正全球性地位；

這就是說，當國家經濟的組成它被驅動到一個更高的地位與尊嚴的標準，

並賦予好的台灣人管理，對於台灣的國家財政系統！

當然，今天，中國是全球經濟的主要力量，但是，中國還沒有準備好；

簡單來說，歷史與文化是不夠的；

最重要的是，台灣的市場必須是可靠的開放，而且，當前的中國，缺乏自由與獨立條件存在；

為了實現開放的台灣經濟系統，這將有義務允許反對歷史與文化，特別是拒絕政府承擔；

對於蔡英文的經濟改革，紮實與開放的調控是非常關鍵的；

特別是，排除左蠢歷史與文化，包括，經濟學！

可以肯定的是，民進黨正朝著轉型方向，也已經制定許多重要的改革，

進一步說是既定目標，也是如此－不僅想要現在，與未來！

那麼，應該如何在台灣進行？

其實，狹隘觀點的歷史與文化總是問這樣的問題－中國是不是夥伴？

簡單來說，忘掉無論是美麗的歷史與文化，因為它們沒國家熱情，會讓民眾肯定會望而卻步；

是以民進黨能夠採取更加強硬的立場，台灣不僅要具體改革，必須改變－更廣泛的台灣鄉土系統！

台灣窮小子認為歷史與文化將是一個錯誤，因為它們是不公平的國家寡頭利益；

終結歷史是更廣闊與更具戰略性的國家經濟部署

這是一個顯眼的機會，如果我建議，台灣終結；

它可以作為一種激勵，因為歷史與文化缺乏充分準備的自由與獨立！

最後，處理台灣經濟被視為國家願景，為未來的國家財政系統；

而台灣人將成為主要的參與者－終結歷史是無可避免的！

這將是一個顯著的成就為台灣創造一個未來的全球藍圖！

制定策略與戰術部署的正確方法

歷史與文化太小了，我們可能完全錯過問題；

如果它們太大，那台灣人將被唬爛淹死！