窮小子冷眼輯

【八-二】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

【可能性策略部署】【維持現狀，繼續執行中華民國當前政策】 

【一】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】 【二】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】 【三】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

【四】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】 【五】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】【經濟篇】 【六】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】【軍事與政治心理篇】

【七】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】 【八】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】 【八-一】【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~維持現狀】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子

MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN，Tsai Ing-wen，(the son of destiny)

24TH，OCTOBER，2018

【八-二】【分離】 
建議是分離:
當前的全球趨勢，將逐步引導台灣，退出左翼歷史與文化的承諾，以及我們在台灣的分離與政策，這不是分離意識的決定，而是因為我們必須承諾維持一致性的台灣傳統現狀；這類力量可能來自現在的台灣人，除非我們加快努力，在台灣，維持一個成功現狀的政治與經濟系統的決心與信心!
有些左翼歷史與文化，主張決定獨立自己，從表面上來看，這作為一類行動有一定的吸引力，因為它似乎透過歷史與文化集中在虛假的承諾；這類論點忽略相對性台灣人能力與優勢；左翼歷史與文化在全球，除非完全服從中國，不然，沒有辦法自我克服!
因此，與中國對比，最終，獨立將讓我們台灣人投降，或是單兵作戰，具備有限的防衛能力；這是唯一的可能性，除非我們台灣人準備冒險來發動戰爭，因為過度獨立，台灣將會自發地從內部毀滅台灣；這類論點，也忽略對我們台灣人生活方式的信念，產生嚴重的影響!
隨著中國主導左翼歷史與文化國家，明顯地，中國人不會因為放棄左翼歷史與文化，或感覺深深的內疚與責任感；隨著中國調動其國家資源，提高軍事能力，並升高其對我們的安全威脅；台灣左翼份子會嘗試接受虛假的和平，但是，大多數台灣人希望維持右邊獨立與自由現狀來防衛台灣!
在這類狀況下，左翼歷史與文化將會侵蝕台灣人的士氣，台灣的活力，與中華民國完整性機制將會被推翻!
依據左翼歷史與文化行動，除非遵照中國的意思，否則就沒有交流，因為台灣會放棄獨立與自由的目標!
中國似乎不大可能坐以待斃，等待被攻擊；戰爭看起來成功與巨大，因此，不大可能透過其他模式，實現左翼歷史與文化的目標!
【作戰】
有些台灣人贊成在未來，故意決定對中國挑釁~~~台灣獨立!
換句話說，戰爭的理念，在軍事攻擊定義上，不是對台灣，或台灣人的軍事攻擊所引起，對中國人來說，通常是無法接受的!
另言之，除了戰爭危機之外，台灣無法動員與反擊中國對左翼歷史與文化治理的驅動；但是從歷史的角度來看，中國是正確與有力量的!
重點是戰爭的前提是，假設中國能夠引爆，並維持足夠的影響力，並在長期戰爭中，取得台灣的決定性優勢，贏得戰爭?
其實，中國發動有效攻擊行動的能力僅限於歷史與文化經濟學進行攻擊台灣；是以這將意味一類困難與漫長的作戰，在此期間，台灣的存活能力將受到嚴重攻擊，台灣人的獨立與自由將會被毀滅!
即使，中國的行為具有挑釁，是以中國的攻擊對大部分台灣人來說，是很讓人賭爛；雖然，台灣人會支持戰爭的努力，但是左，翼歷史與文化的責任在台灣傳統上具有殺傷力!
所以，在戰爭中贏得勝利，如果在基本的維持現狀意識中，取得勝利，那就會給我們台灣人帶來很少影響!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【8-2】【POSSIBLE STRATEGIES OF DEPLOYMENT】
【Segregation】
Recommendation - Segregation.
The current of the global trends，will lead progressively to the withdrawal of the Taiwan from Left-wing's history and culture commitments；this would result not from a ideological segregation，but to take the actions that we must be with our commitments and maintaining the status quo of the tradidional Taiwan. 
This power could come from now Taiwanese people ，unless we have confidence in our determination to speed up our efforts to maintain a successfully the status quo of the  political and economic system in the Taiwan.
Left-wing's history and culture some who  stand for a decision to independent  themselves，superficially，this has some attractiveness as a direction of action，since it appears to bring false commitments by concentrating history and culture.
This disputation overlooks the relativity of Taiwanese people capabilities and superiority.
Left-wing's history and culture is no way to make ourselves unobjectionable to the Sino obey by complete surrender  to its will. 
Therefore independence would in the end make our Taiwanese people to surrender or to fight alone and with limited offensive capabilities in comparison with the Sino.
These are the only possibilities，unless our Taiwanese people，who prepared to risk the start the war，that the Taiwan，because of over - independence，will spontaneously devastate Taiwan from within.
This disputation also overlooks our belief in ourselves and in our way of life，and nevertheless extreme impacts.
As the Sino came to dominate Left-wing's history and culture，it is clear that many Chinese would not feel a deep sense of guilt and responsibility for having given up Left-wing's history and culture.
As the Sino mobilized the National resources，increased its military capabilities，and gone up its threat to our security，Taiwanese Leftists would be tried to accept false peace on its terms，while the most Taiwanese people would be hope to defend the Taiwan by the maintaining the status quo of the Rightside of independence and freedom.
In this station of eats away Taiwanese people morale would be corrupted and the integrity and vitality of the R.O.C. mechanism and the Taiwan subverted.
According with Left-wing's history and culture of action，there would be no interaction，unless on the Sino's means，for Taiwan would have given up freedom and independence of objectives.
It appears unlikely that the Sino would sit still waiting for such an attack before launching one of its own. 
The wars appear so success and enormous so likely that they an attempt to achieve Left-wing's history and culture goals by other models.
【Warfare】
Some Taiwanese people favor a deliberate decision to go to provoke against the Sino - the Taiwanese Independence.
In other words，that the concept of "warfare" in the sense of a military attack not provoked by a military attack up the Taiwan or Taiwanese people that is usually unacceptable to Chunese.
In turn，that the Taiwan is probably unable，except under the crisis of warfare，to mobilize and counterattack to the Sino's oush for Left-wing's history and culture dominion. 
But the Sino is a right and powerful in the light of history.
The point for warfare is premised on the assumption that the Sino may fire off and keep an attack of enough influence to get a decisive superiority for the Taiwan in a long war and to win the warfare.
Indeed，the ability of the Sion to fire off effective offensive operations is limited to attack the Taiwan with hisotry and culture，economy.
As  this would probably mean a tough and long warfare during which the survivable capacity of the Taiwan will attack seriously and Taiwanese people independence and freedom would be devastate blow.
Therefore，a attack on the Sino，despite the provocativeness of the Soviet behavior，would be repugnant to the most of Taiwanese people.
Although the Taiwanese would crowd in support of the warfare effort，but responsibility for Left-wing's history and culture would be antipersonnel force in the traditional Taiwan.
So victory in such a warfare could have brought our Taiwanese people  little if at all closer to victory in the fundamental ideological the maintaining the status quo.