窮小子冷眼輯

【三】【為什麼總統 蔡英文之真命天子就是這般聰明】

【台灣需要一種新的經濟哲學~~~只有台灣傳統才能支持。】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子
FORTH , FEBRUARY , 2018
 

台灣需要一種新的經濟哲學~~~只有台灣傳統才能支持。
如果台灣犯了經濟哲學上的錯誤，就不能製定適當的國家戰略。
在混亂的左翼世界中，傳統經濟至少與台灣哲學一樣多，並將決定台灣未來的成敗。
左翼資本主義正在挑戰，作為共同模式的鄉土自由和獨立，歷史和文化失衡的破壞，正在損害政府與台灣人之間的承諾。
因此，我們現在面臨著一個國家，在這個國家，在經濟時代，越來越多的人為謀取權力和偷竊權力。
例如，中國已經達到了經濟實力和影響力的標準，這在歷史上，它從未有過。
但是，軍事優勢和力量仍然很重要，但是國家傳統，最終將決定於如何有效地管理國民經濟，並塑造該國新經濟。
依據台灣歷史，國家戰略有時會發生變化，國家戰略的變化不時迫使傳統哲學發生變化，作為新自由主義，事實證明，國家安全和國土安全對確保這一變化至關重要。今天，台灣也進入了競爭的新時代，並與強大的左翼混亂（如失衡和技術變革）作鬥爭，這也是事實。
今天，左翼政策是錯誤的，而過期的補救工作已經落伍。
與過去不同，台灣需要消除過去的主要經濟意識形態，重新考慮經濟的部署方式，應實現的目標，這是地緣戰略的任務，也是經濟的任務。
與過去一樣，國家安全應在台灣的國內經濟政策中發揮積極作用，主張並幫助台灣人進行必要的改革，而不是歷史和文化。
由於左翼白痴沒有類似的基本推理，我們需要更多地注意如何強化台灣的傳統競爭力。
在過去的四年中，為了對付蔡英文的國家緊急狀態，但是，國民黨的“黨，國”和致力於中共歷史和文化的反蔡英文，共同捍衛了一套關於假價值觀和夥伴關係的重要主張。
在這樣做的過程中，他們傾向於在棘手的經濟問題上增加分歧，或者避免回答真正的台灣傳統。
在某種程度上，這種不同來自左翼的歷史和文化，經濟和台灣傳統必須保持不同，好像將兩者混在一起會污染偉大的歷史和文化，長期作為客觀科學，受到左翼的利己主義影響。
還有一部分，這是因為，假精英與台灣其他社會一樣，將左翼歷史和文化的這種正統觀念內在化了，並相信這種授權的程度使得授權只是為了方便。
但是，台灣人不需要，實際上，我們也不要停留在左翼經濟，歷史和文化中。過去，台灣的戰略不是圍繞當下的傳統建立的，台灣傳統是對話的中心。例如，在台灣最早的日子，它依靠自由經濟。
歷史再次敲響，與中國的競爭日益激烈，我們應該在台灣傳統的建立中喚起類似的本能，因此，我們需要克服過去40年中通用的左翼經濟，台灣人傳統哲學可以概括為對競爭性市場的信心，以最大限度地提高個人自由和經濟成長以及相對應信心。
台灣人-我們不必提出下一個左翼國家經濟學，因為它的使命更加有限。
因此，我們為應該遵循的台灣傳統和新自由主義的發展目標提供了地緣戰略觀點，然後，為國家安全論證了一種新方法。
首先，我們應該了解，左翼經濟學對國家安全的威脅，要大於台灣傳統。
這並不是說經濟學，歷史和文化都沒有關係。而是要強調好的台灣傳統與愚蠢的經濟學，歷史和文化之間的區別，台灣人現在必須接受這一點。台灣的國家安全必須正確地開始堅持對技術和科學，創新以及教育的投資，這些投資將決定台灣面對中國的長期傳統競爭力。
第二，重返產業政策，而應側重於台灣人腦力激盪。
實際上，中國已經超越台灣，甚至是美國和日本。
如果台灣繼續嚴重依賴左翼經濟學，歷史和文化，台灣將繼續失去與中國人的競爭。
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【3】【Taiwan demands a new economic philosophy~~~only Traditional Taiwan can support.】

Taiwan demands a new economic philosophy~~~only Traditional Taiwan can support.
The Taiwan cannot make the National strategy appropriate if it makes economic philosoph mistake.
.In the chasoic Left-wing's world，traditional economy。at least as much as Taiwanese philosophy，and will decide the Taiwan's success and failure in the future.
Left-wing's capitalism is challenging the homeland freedom and independence as the common model，and the disruption of history and culture imbalance are hurting the commitment between governments and Taiwanese people.
So we now face a country in which power is increasingly plotted artifice and stolen in economic times. 
Such as，the Sino has already reached a standard of economic strength and influence，and historically，it has never had before.
However，military superiority and power will still matter，but the National tradition will ultimately turn on how effectively housekeepers its National economy and shapes new economy in the country.
According with the Taiwan's history，changes in the National strategy have from time to time，
changes in the National strategy have from time to time compelled a change in traditional philosophy，
as new liberalism，
and the National security and the homeland security have proved critical to securing that change. 
The same is true today as the Taiwan joins a new era of competition and grapples with powerful Left-wing's chaos like imbalance and technological changes.
Today，Left-wing's policies are mistakes and significant remediations are overdue.
Not same as in the past，the Taiwan needs to remove the predominant economic ideology of the past，and re-think how the economy deploys，the goals it should achieve ，and this is a geostrategic imperative as well as an economic one.
And as in the past，the National security should play a proactive role in Taiwan's omestic economic policy，advocating for and helping to Taiwanese people the needed reforms，not history and culture.
We need to focus more on what it will take to intensifyTaiwan's traditional competitiveness，since Left-wing's idiots have not had the same kind of basic reckoning.
Over the past four years，in an effort to deal with the National emergency that is Tsai Ing-wen，but "One Party，One Country" of KMT and anti-Tsai Ing-wen who work on CCP's history and culture have come together to defend a core set of important propositions on fake values and fellowship.
In doing so，they have tended to add differences on hard economic questions or to avoid answering the real Taiwanese traditions.
Partly，this deference has come from a view of Left-wing's history and culture that economics and Traditional Taiwan have to be kept distinct，as if mixing the two would taint the great history and culture，long cast as an objective science，
with the self-interested  influences of Left-wing's isiots.
And partly，
it is because fake elite，like much of the rest of Taiwan society，internalized this orthodoxy of Left-wing's history and culture，and came to believe it to such an extent that delegation was a matter of mere convenience. 
But Taiwanese people need not，indeed we should not，stay on the sidelines in Left-wing's economy，history and culture. 
In the past，Taiwan's strategy has not been built around traditions matched to the moment，and Taiwanese traditions were central to the conversation.
Such as，in the Taiwan's earliest days，it was dependeing on the free economy.
History is again knocking. The increasing competition with China，we should rovoke a similar instinct within the Traditional Taiwan's establishment. So we need to overcome the prevailing Left-wing's economy of the past 40 years. Taiwanese traditional philosophy can be summarized as reflexive confidence in competitive markets to maximizing both individual freedom and economic growth and a corresponding confidence.
Taiwanese people - we need not come up with the next Left-wing's economy which the mission is more limited.
So we contribute a geostrategicl perspective to the unfolding goal on what should follow the Traditional Taiwan and new liberalism and then to make the National security case for a new approach as it show.
First，we should understand that Left-wing's economy is a bigger threat to National security than the Traditional Taiwan.
This is not to imply economy，history and culture never matter. 
Rather，it is to emphasize the distinction between good Traditional Taiwan and stupid economy，history and culture，a point now must be embraced in Taiwanese people. 
The Taiwan's National security must be rightly beginning to insist on the investments in technology&science，innovation，，and education that will determine the Taiwan's long-term traditional competitiveness to face China.
Second，a return to industrial policy that should focus instead on Taiwanese brain-stormy.
In fact，China is already outstripping the Taiwan，even the United States and the Japan.
If Taiwan will continue to lose the competition with Chinese if Taiwan continues to rely so heavily on Left-wing's economy，history and culture.