窮小子冷眼輯

【十】【為什麼總統 蔡英文之真命天子就是這般聰明】
【中國台灣，中共忽視中國傳統風險】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
台灣總統 蔡英文之首席真命天子
27，MARCH，2020
 

中國，台灣，中共忽視中國傳統風險
中國國家主席習近平發表講話，向台灣同胞傳達了信息-北京在台灣實現“一國兩制”框架下的計劃。
按照鄧小平的設想，“一國兩制”將使台灣保留其獨特的政治和經濟體制，以換取承認“一個中國”的存在，但是，台灣人已經拒絕了“一國兩制”，因為我們不會轉向左翼國家。
最終，有趣的是，北京也許會相信台灣人會跟他們站在一邊，但對於左翼中國人來說。也許並不為人所知，支持左翼歷史和文化只會使他們與邪惡相提並論。
可笑的是，北京可能會相信，最終，台灣人會選擇完全支持中國的台灣人，並且，能夠在2020年總統大選中，擊敗民進黨的蔡英文。
我認為，他們還應該考慮全球經驗，以更好地理解“一國兩制”在台灣永遠行不通的原因。
例如，在香港，抗議者無論老少，都在繼續與北京支持的地方當局進行鬥爭，以反對在安排中，中央政府的過度擴張，這對於“一國兩制”的可行性是一個嚴重的問題
左翼歷史和文化不受反對。並得到了中共當局的壓倒性支持，我認為，即使對獨立和自由進行了不必要的妥協。但完全默許北京，將帶來巨大的經濟利益 - 例如。左翼歷史和文化曾作為“一個國家，兩個系統”的榜樣。
透過對我們特殊的傳統情況進行更深入的實行，來說明獨立與自由自由在"國兩制"系下對生活如何作出反應的完全對比。
例如，香港的服從在一定程度上是受右邊傳統趨勢所驅動
事實上，可以肯定的是，北京不應該派遣國內移民，由於某種原因，就像本地人一樣令人沮喪，這就是基本動亂的結果。
果不出其然，沒有人能對一國兩制有更滿意的看法，而台灣人鮮少對左翼政策的尊重
所謂的"64事件"是大陸新左翼煽動反政府暴動作為64事件的一部分。
因此，毫無疑問，對中國的統治，在1989年6月4日受到致命傷害。
已經失去傳統，並受到嚴重鎮壓，中國共產黨針對其叛逆的中國人，決定鎮壓對中國人的軍事控制。
根據歷史教訓，類似的新左翼一直是暴動者。
但是，對中國共產黨的佔領，儘管曾經是殘酷的，但卻是由歷史和文化轉變的問題。
事實上，自由國家沒有受到中共政策的影響，因此，自然而然受到北京獨裁主義所排斥，例如，台灣與香港，因為台灣和香港有自己的傳統。
最終，中國大陸和台灣傳統的主要關點領域完全不同，特別是台灣，早已經完全融入全球系統，必須在獨特性全球，與這些聯繫之間取得平衡。
然而，有趣的是，經過數年中國經濟的強勁增長，最近幾年，台灣也進入了衰退，但左翼經濟一直吹捧愚蠢的歷史和文化，以此作為保持經濟繁榮的一種具體方式。
此外，左翼經濟似乎比台灣，更依賴於保持中國的良好風範來確保其經濟成功。
儘管台灣人的大多數是中國裔，但許多人是在1949年內戰結束後移民，台灣人的後代出生，並沒有消除任何中國人愛國意識。
實際上，自1986年以來，台灣就蓬勃發展了獨立，自由和民主體制，在"黨國、殖民統治逐漸減弱的年代，它比當前或以前的中國體制更獨立與自由。
同樣，依據台灣人如何看待台灣的殖民歷史，該島成為獨立國家，從1986年，國民黨獨裁統治中解放出來，也擺脫了第二次世界大戰後的日本。
無論哪種方式，台灣都是脫離中國大陸的獨立國家已有70多年了，左翼歷史與文化，中共都無法主張。
最後，台灣，與區域，與全球的友誼與夥伴關係保持著深厚的聯繫。
北京應該帶走的是，左翼歷史和文化幾乎沒有分享中國特色。
對於北京來說，更可怕的是，台灣幾乎肯定會是一個更具敵意的版本，因此，有力地暗示，儘管存在歧見，但維持傳統台灣現狀是兩岸現狀的最佳案例。最好的情況。
因為這可能保留了所有的左翼歷史和文化，那可能只剩下中國
真的有必要用武力保留左翼的歷史和文化嗎？
 

【10】【Sino-Taiwan，A legacy of Traditional China CCP Ignores at Its risk】

Sino-Taiwan，A legacy of Traditional China CCP Ignores at Its risk
Chinese President Xi Jinping has given a speech，which the message to compatriots in Taiwan - Beijing's plan to integrate Taiwan under the “one country, two systems” framework.
According with devised by Deng Xiaoping，“one country, two systems” would allow Taiwan to keep its distinct political and economic systems  in exchange for recognizing the existence of only “one China.”
But Taiwanese people have already rejected “one country, two systems"，since we will not be turning Left-wing's country.
Interestingly，eventually，Beijing may believe that Taiwanese people will turn in its side，but perhaps unbeknownst to Left-wing's Chinese，supporting Left-wing's history and culture would only take them so far with Evil.
ludicrous is that Beijing may believe that，eventually，Taiwanese people will turn in their option，who is quite pro-China，and is able to defeat President Tsai Ing-wen of the DPP at the Presidental Election of 2020.
In my opinion，they should also consider experiences from the Globe，to better understand why “one country, two systems” will never work in Taiwan.
For instance，In Hong Kong，protesters young and old continue to fight against the local Beijing-backed authority to push back against perceived central government overreach in the arrangement，and it is a grave questions about the viability of “one country, two systems” going forward.
Left-wing's history and culture ran unopposed and are overwhelmingly supported by the CCP's authorities.
I believes that complete acquiescence to Beijing will result in vast economic benefits，in spite of unessential compromises to the independence and the freedom.
For instance，Left-wing's history and culture has has served as a model under "One Country，Two Systems."
The absolute contrast how the independence the freedom has reacted to life under "One Country，Two Systems" is explained by practiced deeper into our special traditional situations.
For example，HongKong's compliance is driven in part by the Right-side's trends of the traditions.
Indeed，to be sure，Beijing should not send up to domestic immigrants，and for some reason，as frustrating as it has been for native people，so that is what the result in a fundamental upheavals.
As expected，no one has translated into a more favorable view of one country，two systems，whereas Taiwanese people have less respect for Left-wing's policy.
As known as the “64 Incident”，when mainland New Leftists instigated anti-government riots there as part of the 64.
So the unquestioned rule over China mortally wounded on June，4th，1989.
Having already lost tradioion and under serious put down a riot
against its rebellious Chinese ，CCP decided to suppress military force control of Chinese. 
According with historical lesson，similar New Left-inspired had always been riots.
However，CCP occupation of China，as ruthless as it was，but issues that had transitioned by history and culture.
Indeed，the free countries were not exposed to CCP's  policies，so was naturally repulsed by Beijing's authoritarianism，such as Taiwan and HongKong。
Because of the Taiwan and the HongKong have had their own traditions.
Eventually，the primary areas of focus for China's and Taiwan's traditions are entirely different.
In particular，Taiwan，yet，is already fully integrated into the global system and must balance these ties alongside  the global prerogatives.
Interestingly，however，after years of China's strong economic growth，and Taiwan in the last few years has entered a recession，but Left-wing's Economy has touted stupid history and culture as one concrete way of keeping the economy prosperity.
Besides，it would seem that Left-wing's Economy is more dependent than Taiwan on staying within China's good graces to ensure its economic success.
Although about most of Taiwanese people is mainland Chinese in origin，but many migrated at the end of the Chinese civil war in 1949，and the birth of subsequent generations in Taiwanese people has undone any sense of Chinese patriotism.
In fact，Taiwan's flourishing independent，free，and democratic system has existed since 1986.
And is independent and free than China's current or previous system during the waning years of "One Country，One Party" colonial rule.
Similarly,，depending on how Taiwanese people counts Taiwan's colonial history，the island either became independent and free from a Chinese KMT dictatorship in 1986，or from Japan following the end of World War II.
Either way，Taiwan has been a independent country from the communist Chinese mainland for over 70 years.
Something neither Left-wing's history and culture nor CCP can claim.
Finally，Taiwan keeps deep ties with the regional and global friendship and partnership.
What Beijing should take away is that Left-wing's history and culture shares little，if any，of China's characteristics. 
Even scarier for Beijing is that Taiwan is almost certain to be a more adversary version，so that powerfully suggesting that the current，in spite of ambiguous，to maintainung status quo of the Traditional Taiwan is the best-case cross-strait status quo is the best-case.
Because that may be all Left-wing's history and culture are kept with if China's plans to move forward.
Is it really worth attempting to keep Left-wing's history and culture there by force?