蔡英文主席之全球戰略概要感想?四部曲

 參考和研讀資料來源:如何評估和處理,未來的全球戰略可能性發展,特別是,國家&國際安全環境!

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

還是沒有,瞄或瞥上歷史論述;

不可否認,土共和美國,言之有理,國家秩序&城市發展是硬道理;

沒有了國家秩序就沒有國家發展,這是也扯不上任何國際法和歷史論述;

 

課堂論述歸課堂論述,也真是很迷人,但還是女人比較迷人!

就算是歷史再怎麼迷人,但還是蔡英文主席最迷人!

 I do realize I myself may sound cynical about the statement and perhaps I am,actually,it will not be ask us to fight with the China and break promise with the US.

真的好熟悉 cynical /will not be ask , 不過不記得是誰說過的話語?

想當然耳,窮小子,應該沒有給旯仔肉糊到和耳背!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

二十一世紀的國家理念/四篇

Preface/summary

The national order of the 21st century means diversificatin and based on integration capabilities,

in particular,seeks in the interests and interaction of security and stability.
The means diversificatin and integration capabilities of the national order reflects real potential national center of influence.
It should be able to improve national&city development,especially,the opening to cooperation of international relations.
So,the national order and city development should be provided through partership interaction.
Perhaps that explain that it is a adjustment to make the national influence and establish a future security framework.
The city cooperative development also depends on the national order interation with security framework.
Believes that the China should follow the same pattern.


中文版

The concept of the statism in the 21st century/tune four

二十一世紀的國家秩序,應該是一種手段和整合能力;

特別是,在互動和價值中,追求安全和穩定;
國家秩序的手段和整合能力,真正地反應,國家核心影響力;
應該能夠,增強,國家&城市的發展,格外是,開放合作的國際關係;
所以,國家秩序和城市發展,應該是通過合作關係,所相互影響;
這可能說明,它是一個調整,來塑造國家影響力和建構未來的安全架構;
城市合作發展還是仰賴國家秩序的互動和安全架構;
相信中國應該也遵循相同模式
.


    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()