What on earth,whether the national system in China,or not?
The answer is none.
Obviously speaking,in particular,China has been coming into the 21st century,so it needs a national system,but,not same as the national system of the U.S.and Russia.Because it is no value.
Simply speaking,China does not have national system,so,it has no constitutional power.
Even though,China has started to change since 1978,to promote political unity and economic development.
But,China had not operated a large force,yet.
However ,so-called that the Chinese democratization should formalized by power of the federal government,also,it is a major element and cannot be a separative pressure.
The centralization has been elements that,so,one time formalized that will start to Chinese democratization. It could have been pressure,also,could not have been separatism.It will be power and provide under control.
Meanwhile,the pressure and capability are also able to make the national leadership is operating executing the strategy to get the regions control power.Because decentralized groups has been easily to bring about problems.
In other words,it should be,perhaps that China had had a longer history of political power. Eventually,will establish institutionally of centralization system.
It will be likely to happen.
A best of the centralization system relationship that will support resolve big place problems,even and small island.
Imagation of the China military relations for the future.
Obviously speaking.the military relations have almost become polotocized in China,simpliy put,technology and proactive concept have already gone.And,the situation may have been weakening the national military advantage.
The using history to explain the military change is nothing for value because it is incapability to carry out the needed changes.
In other words,the military relation have stability and predictability,at the same time,it can be cohesive,in particular,also,are connectible well-structured units and advantages.
Of course,it would like to be successful military relations that will require an effort to change without opinions.In particular,the military does not seems return to exercised leadership by federal government,however,it should be facing the federal government in this direction.
After all,any significant opposition is possibility.Global value.
In fact,military relationships are important that key of nation and society relationship,and as such,reflects situations in the nation and society.
To sum up,the key of question is that,how will become larger part of the nation and society,it is not transition that should be appear in an element of the national defense military.
- Jun 21 Tue 2011 23:05