What on earth,whether the national system in China,or not?
The answer is none.

Obviously speaking,in particular,China has been coming into the 21st century,so it needs a national system,but,not same as the national system of the U.S.and Russia.Because it is no value.
Simply speaking,China does not have national system,so,it has no constitutional power.
Even though,China has started to change since 1978,to promote political unity and economic development.
But,China had not operated a large force,yet.
However ,so-called that the Chinese democratization should formalized by power of the federal government,also,it is a major element and cannot be a separative pressure.
The centralization has been elements that,so,one time formalized that will start to Chinese democratization. It could have been pressure,also,could not have been separatism.It will be power and provide under control.
Meanwhile,the pressure and capability are also able to make the national leadership is operating executing the strategy to get the regions control power.Because decentralized groups has been easily to bring about problems.
In other words,it should be,perhaps that China had had a longer history of political power. Eventually,will establish institutionally of centralization system.
It will be likely to happen.
A best of the centralization system relationship that will support resolve big place problems,even and small island.

Imagation of the China military relations for the future.

Obviously speaking.the military relations have almost become polotocized in China,simpliy put,technology and proactive concept have already gone.And,the situation may have been weakening the national military advantage.
The using history to explain the military change is nothing for value because it is incapability to carry out the needed changes.
In other words,the military relation have stability and predictability,at the same time,it can be cohesive,in particular,also,are connectible well-structured units and advantages.
Of course,it would like to be successful military relations that will require an effort to change without opinions.In particular,the military does not seems return to exercised leadership by federal government,however,it should be facing the federal government in this direction.
After all,any significant opposition is possibility.Global value.
In fact,military relationships are important that key of nation and society relationship,and as such,reflects situations in the nation and society.

To sum up,the key of question is that,how will become larger part of the nation and society,it is not transition that should be appear in an element of the national defense military.


中文版:
中國到底有沒有政體?沒有!

平心而論,一個中國,特別是,邁入二十一世紀它需要一個政體;
但不是如美國和蘇聯的政體,因為是沒有價值;
簡單來說,中國沒有政體,所以,也沒有憲政權力;
雖然,自1978年起,中國已經開始改變來促進政治統一和發展經濟;
但是,還未充分利用龐大的力量;
然而,所謂中國民主化應該是正式確立中央政府的權力;
這是一個主要因素,它不會是一類分裂的壓力;
權力集中是因素,所以,正式確立後,應該將會啟動中國民主化;
它不是壓力,也不會是分離,這是力量和提供控制之下;
同時,壓力和能力也能夠讓國家領導運用執行策略來取得地區控制權力;
因為分散的個體容易造成問題;
換句話說,應該是,可能是,中國具有長遠的歷史政治權力;
最後是,建構制度化的中央集權系統;
這才是有可能發生;
好的中央集權系統關係有助於解決大地方問題,包括,小島.

想像中國的未來軍事關係
平心而論,軍事關係幾乎成為政治化在中國;
簡單來,說技術領域和視域,早已經不見;
不可否認,情況可能減弱國家軍力優勢;
以歷史等來說明軍事改變是沒有價值;
因為它無能力來做必要改變;
換句話說,軍事關係具有穩定性和預測興;
同時,它可以擬聚,特別是,也能夠聯結結構良好的單位和優點;
想當然耳,想要取得成功的軍事關係就需要努力地來改變,沒有意見;
特別是,軍方似乎沒有回歸中央政府來領導;
然而,應該是面向中央政府來作發展;
畢竟,任何反對是有可能,普世價值!
事實上,軍事關係是國家和社會的重要部分關係;
更因此能反映國家和社會條件.



    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()