豪宅.jpg  

思考來自蔡英文主席之社會住宅?

293491_10150304328666065_46251501064_8123095_424567293_n.jpg  

不加稅下社會住宅政策?
感想概論:

10122011 posted by 台灣窮小子
So-called the the made a strategic decision of social housing were enacted early in the Ex.President.Lee who advocated:" 6 million NT dollars public housing",in addition,it was also not increase taxes to response.But,it has been for long time,and it may need Ex.President.Lee of explaination;so,in according with Chairwoman 蔡英文 of policy demand,in which,can under the does not increase taxes that reviewing the policy of social housing?
Thus,it is still need to examines of the Taiwan of the long-term economic enviroment at that time,inparticular,current economic enviroment.
After all,in long-term,the social housing is unsustainable in national fiscal consideration.Expecially,it must consider with national finance and tax revenue options,because it takes balance between different options to kee; national finance sustainability and advaning national economy growth.
If so,central government will only effort to stimulate the economic activity,that may bring about national budget deficit increased,and its point will probably show that high unemployment and reduce economic growth.
If not,allowing the policy of social housing to execute as wish will somewhat improve national finance condition,but,it also may destroy national economic growth.
At another levels,enduringly all of welfare policies would not
reduce national economy growth,but,in long-term,it may influence national finance outlook and growth,in particular,in dealing with the long-term of national finance conditions.In other words,how to distribute?
As look back to Ex,president.Lee of 6 million policy of social housing,and it cannot denied that its based on people-banker,builder system-government.It can imagine that it is equitable.
Of course,policy of social housing has proposed ,and must bring into people's individual income tax rates,in particular,high income taxpayers and middle class taxpayers of tax rates on long-term capital gains,in addition,increase marriage rates.
The policy of social housing has proposed,in which,still cannot destroy national economic growth and finance consideration,in a while,allowing increase tax to reduce national budget deficit,and than,the policy of social housing will be sustainability.In particular,high income taxpayers.

In short,Under the does not increase taxes,the policy of social housing which depends on its based on people-banker,builder system-government.It can imagine that it is equitable.So,Ex.Presidnet Lee's explanation was right!
But,on the management sustainability,and increase taxes and Congress to consider tax reform are responsible for decision-making.

Under the does not increase taxes,the policy of social housing?
Reflective Summary:

所謂社會住宅的政策擬定,最早緣歸李前總統所倡:六百萬平價國民住宅;而且也不增稅來因應?
但是,年代久遠,可能需要李前總統的說明;
所以,端視蔡英文主席的政策訴求,應該也能夠:
在不增稅下重新審視社會住宅政策?
雖然,仍必須參考當時的台灣長期的經濟環境,特別是,當前的經濟環境;
畢竟,社會住宅在長期的國家財政考量是很難維持;
格外是,必須考量國家財政和稅收選項;
因為在不同選項之間,要取得平衡,以便保持國家財政持續性和促進國家經濟成長;
如果,中央政府儘是努力刺激經濟活動,可能導致國家預算赤字上升;
其特點將可能顯示是高失業率和降低經濟成長;
如果不是,讓社會住宅政策如願,可能有所改善國家財政狀況,不過,也可能破壞國家經濟成長;
在另個層面,所有的福利政策不會降低國家經濟成長,但可能會影響長期的國家財政前景和成長,特別是,處理長期性的國家財政狀況;
換句話說,如何分配?
或如,回顧以前,李前總統的六百萬國民住宅政策,不可否認其架構在民眾-銀行,建築商系統-政府,可以想像,它是公平的;
當然耳,社會住宅政策提出和必須納入民眾所得稅稅率;
特別是,高收入納稅人和中產階級納稅人長期資本稅收,此外,增加婚姻稅率;
社會住宅政策提出,還是以不破壞國家經濟成長和國家財政考量,同時,允許增稅來降低國家預算赤字,如此一來,社會住宅政策方能持續,特別是,高收入納稅人;

總之,在不加稅下社會住宅政策傾向於其架構在民眾-銀行,建築商系統-政府,所以,李前總統的說明是對的!
但在永續經營上,加稅和國會稅制改革才是因應決策.

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()