窮小子冷眼輯

平心而論,端視蔡英文主席說明還是頗感納悶?

話說,那個牧師女兒的話還不如Dr.Condoleezza Rice;所以,能信嗎?

是以馬總統的說明也無可議!頗似李前總統 登輝先生曾言:非什麼非?又不是不能解決?

所以,應該是歸納入國家戰略能源儲備?對不對呢?

國家戰略能源儲備?

台灣窮小子 posted by 十一月五日二零一一年

Obviously speaking,it may conclude into the National strategic energy reserve that explain a word of non-nuclear energy.Particular,it allow use of National strategic energy reserve for specific periods to resolve National supply interruptions of assessment in status.
After all,the significant of a severe energy supply interruption has been confused.According with Global historical experience has proved that severe energy market supply interruption and energy market of supply and require can bring about,or is expected to aim a severe increase in prices.It cannot denied.
Although,discourages operate existing of the National strategic energy reserve to address energy deployment,or it should begin and increase National strategic energy reserve substitutes a word of  non-nuclear energy.So,it may increased severe issues and energy prices up,as Ex.President.李登輝 language was exactly right.
Simply speaking,National strategic energy reserve will be new of beginning to win National energy deployment in balance.As followed:
1,Purchase and develop new of energy
2,Delivery and deploy future framework
3,Resume and deliver future needs.

Because National strategic energy reserve will fill,not confrontation.Also,not simplex acquisition and sale.
National strategic energy reserve will replenish which either to further energy security objectives,or as a means of providing,or  price support to domestic producers who were struggling to keep higher-cost, marginal production in service,in which,in order to its should reduce National encumbrance.
National strategic energy reserve will replenish which either to further energy security objectives,or as a means of providing,or  price support to domestic producers who were struggling to keep higher-cost, marginal production in service,in which,in order to its should reduce National encumbrance.
It  cannot denied the goal of National strategic energy reserve will establish a National reserve when under the condition of supply interruption to operate it,despit of out of sort opinions.
However,Japan experienced during the 2011,crisis tight and lack of confidence which can be triggered by anxious.But,National strategic energy reserve also to stress the importance of coordinating,in order to defeat the future energy price-stabilizing objectives.
Obviously speaking,it is a new national policy as a significant new beginning.Considerably easing out of sort over the Administration's policy,in a while,also,it can prevent which comes from global influence.Especially,prospect and gasoline prices up,and oil supply problem.
Even through,Japan experience was a an important learning pattern,but, National strategic energy reserve may the best way be deployed to maximize its usefulness action.


In short,to establishment of a National strategic energy reserve
It cannot denied that crisis can be triggered by anxious,but also be power.So,it should be renewed establishment of a National strategic energy reserve.In addition,the President can also authorize,while under disputations,and energy prices up.In particular,establish regional reserves capability.

Keep as offensively as if there will no reserve,it will ?

National strategic energy reserve?

平心而論,可能歸納入國家戰略能源儲備來說明,非核一詞;
特別是,允許使用國家戰略能源儲備,在一定時程內,解決國家能源供應中斷的狀況評估;
畢竟,一個嚴重的能源供應中斷的定義,已經被模糊?
依據,全球歷史經驗證明:嚴重的國家能源供應中斷和能源市場供求會造成,或預期影響,嚴重的價格增加,這是無可否認;
雖然,不鼓勵運用現有國家戰略能源儲備以解決能源佈署或應該開始和增加國家戰略能源儲備來替代非核一詞;
所以,端視李前總統 登輝先生有言正確,可能在未來,將增加嚴重的問題和能源價格上揚;
簡單來說,國家戰略能源儲備是新的起動來取得國家能源佈署的平衡,或如:
一,購買和發展新興能源;
二,提供和佈署未來架構;
三,恢復和交付未來需求;

因為國家戰略能源儲備是填補,不是對抗,也不是單純的收購和銷售;
國家戰略能源儲備是補充,以進一步的能源安全的目標,或提供的一種手段,或努力保持較高的成本的國內生產者價格,支持生產服務其目的;
應該是降低國家負擔;
即使,有不爽的意見,不可否認,國家戰略能源儲備的目的是建構一個儲備;在供應中斷的情況下,可以運用它;
然而,在2011年的日本經驗危機緊張和缺乏信心引發憂慮;
但是,國家戰略能源儲備,也強調協調的重要性來擊敗未來能源價格的穩定目標;
平心而論,它是一個新的國家政策來作為新的開始;
可能,在相當程度上,緩和不爽政府當局的國家政策,同時,也能夠預防來自全球影響;
格外是,升級前景和能源價格上漲和供應問題;
日本經驗雖然是一個重要的學習模式;
但國家戰略能源儲備,可能才是最佳部署,最大程度在發揮開放作用;
總之,建立一個國家戰略能源儲備;
不可否認,危機產生憂慮,但也是動力;
所以,應該重新建立一個國家戰略能源儲備,而且,總統可以授權,當面對爭執不休的狀況下和能源價格上升,特別是,區域儲備能力;

保持積極,如果如果沒有儲備?

二,全面性的國家能源政策是一個藍圖或能顯示未來的能源發展和安全這是一個將如何保證未來

台灣窮小子二○一一年五月十七日

Simply speaking,promise and protect a secure energy future,that something change.
The future of energy policy to promise the national energy by reducing dependence on oil fuels,even,by operating cleaner energy to provide energy efficiency,including,alternative energy.
After all,the money affect everyone,especially,enterprises,because the price will be still to rise,money,that is why the nation needs more secure and available of the energy resoures.
Simply speaking,control and integrate diverse energy integrate.
The integrate will make developing toward the goal,because this is need to responsible and provide secure to face energy challenge,in particular,reducing dependence on oil ,at the same time,increasing energy efficiency.
Perhaps that the nation will help people and businesses save money.This should be that the nation and people efforts,including,cooperation between the
political parties,in particular,nuclear power ,clean coal,natural gas and renewable energy,as well as the cutting edge of energy technology to work together for 21st century.
It should be a blueprint secure energy for the future that explain the national energy policy to seek and promise to upon on energy future.
The nation need deploy the energy technology to secure energy supplies that make people and businesses,in which,able to have energy and responsible to develop.
Start responsible and secure production and development to lead the country toward
secure and safer energy supplies.
Because it is choice to reduce people and enterprises costs that create more jobs opportunities and help country.
It cannot denied that will be national energy policy.
The point is that save money.
Operate energy technology to develop and resecrch that work together for the future,especially,lead by example,to establish energy technology patterns.

簡單來說,保證和保護一個安全的未來能源,有些事是要改變;
未來能源政策來保證國家能源減少仰賴化石燃料,從而,運用乾淨能源來提高能源效率,包括,替代能源;
畢竟,錢還是影響每個人,格外是,企業,因為,價格還會將繼續攀升,錢;這就是為什麼,國
家需要多種安全和可運用的能源資源,簡單來說,控制和整合,多元能源整合;
整合可能取得發展來實現目標,因為這是需要負責任和提供安全來面對能源挑戰;
特別是,降低對原油仰賴,同時,提高能源效率,或許,在未來國家幫助民眾和企業,節省錢;
這應該是國家和民眾的努力,包括,政黨間的合作來強調能源,特別是,核能,乾淨媒,天然氣和再生能源,以能源技術,共同面對二十一世紀;
這應該是一個未來能源安全藍圖來說明國家能源政策來追求和保證未來的能源依賴;
國家需要部署能源技術來鞏固能源供應來讓民眾和企業能夠有精力和責任來發展;
啟動安全和負責任的生產和開發來帶領國家有可靠安全的能源供應;因為它是選擇來降低民眾和企業成本來創造更好的就業機會和幫助國家;
不可否認,這才是國家能源政策,重點是省錢;
運用能源技術來發展和研究,共同面對未來;格外是,以身作賊來建構能源技術模式.



引述蔡英文主席說明:

蔡英文主席對馬總統發表能源政策的回應 【2011/11/3】

針對馬英九總統提出「確保核安、穩健減核，打造綠能低碳環境、逐步邁向非核家園」能源政策，民進黨主席蔡英文今（3）日表示，馬總統未正視核電風險，持續進行核電計畫，非僅不利我國永續能源政策的推展，執意核四運轉，更形同讓非核家園的實現延遲到三十年後甚至更久，讓下一代的台灣人繼續承受風險與恐懼。蔡英文說，顯然只有政黨再次輪替，非核家園的目標才有機會落實。

蔡英文表示，馬總統一方面主張核四要商轉，一方面說：「寧可犧牲核電，絕不造成核災」。這句話乍聽之下有點動聽，但是如果仔細的想一想，其實是自我矛盾、完全禁不起檢驗。蔡英文說，日本福島核災的畫面至今歷歷在目，而根據專家的估計，這次核災所帶來對日本人民和土地的傷害恐怕要超過三十年以上。特別是地震、海嘯這樣的天災根本不是人類可以事先預防的，一旦危及核電安全，那時才要放棄核電、犧牲核電恐怕早就來不及了。

蔡英文說，這也是為什麼在福島核災後，世界上許多國家紛紛調整核電政策，希望在最短時間內完成非核家園，唯獨馬總統似乎對這股國際趨勢無動於衷。

對於馬總統主張核四將在民國106年啟用，蔡英文則表示，過去半年來，包括原能會官員在內，越來越多的核安專家對興建中的核四廠安全性提出警告，例如七月間，核四安全監督委員林宗堯便提出《核四論》，用「完全崩壞」來形容核四目前的施工狀況，而原能會副主委謝得志，更多次向府院高層提出「建請核四年底前停工」建議。而九月起，多位核四安全監督委員更因為建言無效而陸續請辭。蔡英文質疑，馬總統說為了提出這項能源政策，曾親自召開十多次會議，但為何這些甚至是見諸報端的官員、專家的意見，為什麼總統就是看不見？

蔡英文表示，我國的「環境基本法」中明確規定「政府應訂定計畫，逐步達到非核家園目標」，但馬總統卻執意繼續核四計畫，依照核四廠服役年限為30年來算，這形同讓未來30年，也就是我們的下一個世代，繼續生活在核安風險的恐懼當中，而政府如果決定繼續依賴核電，當然就不會積極的推動節能，也不會認真的發展再生能源，更不會致力於改善發電效率，「因為有了核電廠，好像一切都不必要做」。

蔡英文說，這就是為什麼民進黨要提出「2025非核家園計畫」，就是希望從現在開始十三年的過程中，徹底的調整台灣的產業和能源結構，讓下一個世代就可以免於核災的恐懼，而相對於馬總統的繼續擁抱核能，蔡英文認為，唯有再次政黨輪替，台灣才能真正走向非核家園。