窮小子冷眼輯

不可否認,應該是蔡英文主席的戰略訴求:擴大內需是正確的錢瞻和視域

或如:蔡英文認為，台灣須改變產業結構，讓薪資所得有成長空間，發展在地經濟擴大內需。

不僅是美國特別是中共更也是全球倡議

美國之所以強大就是擁有龐大的國家生產動能特別是中小企業的活躍再聯合大型企業的作戰能力所展現出來就是國家實力

換句話說找回昔時台灣靈巧的手熟練工人族群或也是:
蔡英文主席有言中肯:改變產業結構擴大內需

然派遣一詞就是剝削的代名詞有甚麼好關注呢?企業培訓正職勞工這是聯合作戰下永續經營法則無庸置疑

所以簡單權衡哪一類的國家未來戰略訴求是具備錢瞻和視域呢?

最後就國民住宅一詞或如:

12182100 copyrighted by 台灣窮小子

不加稅下社會住宅政策?(二版)
感想概論:
所謂社會住宅的政策擬定,最早緣歸李前總統所倡:六百萬平價國民住宅;而且也不增稅來因應?
但是,年代久遠,可能需要李前總統的說明;
所以,端視蔡英文主席的政策訴求,應該也能夠:在不增稅下重新審視社會住宅政策?
雖然,仍必須參考當時的台灣長期的經濟環境,特別是,當前的經濟環境;
畢竟,社會住宅在長期的國家財政考量是很難維持;
格外是,必須考量國家財政和稅收選項;
因為在不同選項之間,要取得平衡,以便保持國家財政持續性和促進國家經濟成長;
如果,中央政府儘是努力刺激經濟活動,可能導致國家預算赤字上升;
其特點將可能顯示是高失業率和降低經濟成長;
如果不是,讓社會住宅政策如願,可能有所改善國家財政狀況,不過,也可能破壞國家經濟成長;
在另個層面,所有的福利政策不會降低國家經濟成長,但可能會影響長期的國家
財政前景和成長,特別是,處理長期性的國家財政狀況;
換句話說,如何分配?
或如,回顧以前,李前總統的六百萬國民住宅政策,不可否認其架構在民眾-銀行,
建築商系統-政府,可以想像,它是公平的;
當然耳,社會住宅政策提出和必須納入民眾所得稅稅率;
特別是,高收入納稅人和中產階級納稅人長期資本稅收,此外,增加婚姻稅率;
社會住宅政策提出,還是以不破壞國家經濟成長和國家財政考量,同時,允許增
稅來降低國家預算赤字,如此一來,社會住宅政策方能持續,特別是,高收入納稅人;
總之,在不加稅下社會住宅政策傾向於其架構在民眾-銀行,建築商系統-政府,
所以,李前總統的說明是對的!
但在永續經營上,加稅和國會稅制改革才是因應決策.

Under the does not increase taxes,the policy of social housing?
Reflective Summary:
So-called the the made a strategic decision of social housing were enacted early in the Ex.President.Lee who advocated:" 6 million NT dollars public housing",in addition,it was also not increase taxes to response.But,it has been for long time,and it may need Ex.President.Lee of explaination;so,in according with Chairwoman 蔡英文 of policy demand,in which,can under the does not increase taxes that reviewing the policy of social housing?
Thus,it is still need to examines of the Taiwan of the long-term economic enviroment at that time,inparticular,current economic enviroment.
After all,in long-term,the social housing is unsustainable in national fiscal consideration.Expecially,it must consider with national finance and tax revenue options,because it takes balance between different options to keep national finance sustainability and advancing national economy growth.
If so,central government will only effort to stimulate the economic activity,that may bring about national budget deficit increased,and its point will probably show that high unemployment and reduce economic growth.
If not,allowing the policy of social housing to execute as wish will somewhat improve national finance condition,but,it also may destroy national economic growth.
At another levels,enduringly all of welfare policies would not reduce national economy growth,but,in long-term,it may influence national finance outlook and growth,in particular,in dealing with the long-term of national finance
conditions.In other words,how to distribute?
As look back to Ex,president.Lee of 6 million policy of social housing,and it cannot
denied that its based on people-banker,builder system-government.It can imagine that
it is equitable.
Of course,policy of social housing has proposed ,and must bring into people's individual income tax rates,in particular,high income taxpayers and middle class taxpayers of tax rates on long-term capital gains,in addition,increase marriage rates.
The policy of social housing has proposed,in which,still cannot destroy national economic growth and finance consideration,in a while,allowing increase tax to reduce national budget deficit,and than,the policy of social housing will be sustainability.In particular,high income taxpayers.
In short,Under the does not increase taxes,the policy of social housing which depends on its based on people-banker,builder system-government.It can imagine that it is equitable.So,Ex.Presidnet Lee's explanation was right!
But,on the management sustainability,and increase taxes and Congress to consider tax reform are responsible for decision-making.

引述如下:

馬宋關注派遣工 蔡提擴大內需

中央社 – 2011年12月18日 上午5:33

（中央社記者魏紜鈴台北17日電）當前台灣900萬名勞工，面臨非典型勞工派遣、無薪假氾濫的困境，馬英九主張以法律保障派遣工權益；宋楚瑜承諾未來公家機關不用派遣工；蔡英文認為，應改變產業結構擴大內需。

公共電視、中央通訊社、中國時報、自由時報、聯合報、蘋果日報共同主辦的「2012總統大選電視辯論」第3場今天下午登場，3位總統候選人今天回應台灣勞工陣線聯盟提問「如何改善勞工困境」時，國民黨總統候選人馬英九主張，要透過法律保障派遣工權益，並呼籲企業多發年終照顧勞工。

親民黨總統候選人宋楚瑜明確承諾，當選後公家機關不會任用派遣工，並限制企業使用派遣工比率；民進黨總統候選人蔡英文認為，台灣須改變產業結構，讓薪資所得有成長空間，發展在地經濟擴大內需。