2012-03-22T114054Z_01_SIN32_RTRIDSP_3_CHINA  

序言:
其實,吳伯公真的是好人,但歷史直線真的念得不夠多?

不可否認,終結歷史後,真的很簡單:"分手尚且是夥伴,何必非作骨肉親"!

另說蔡英文女士和王丹先生也不甚了解!少說點歷史直線?明天真的會更好!

歷史直線:http://kudou543.pixnet.net/blog/post/37073140

一個中國的原則和平夥伴關係

二零一二年三月十三日Posted by 台灣窮小子
依據長期以來的研讀經驗,來自不同的論述;
單一國家原則,必然會面對許多不同的挑戰;
特別是,有些人可能會說,這注定是失敗;
如果,僅依據失敗論來說,其最大的戰術錯誤是缺少一個共同的夥伴關係來支持;
反之,一國兩區,所反映的僅是一個歷史事實;
因為,我們從來沒有建立和平夥伴關係;
不可否認,單一國家原則,也創造對話和妥協;
特別是,可能在某些層面會失去能力;
但是,國家原則是應對未來,在未來的政治,軍事和經濟等,條件變化;
長期以來,就是缺少共同的夥伴關係的國家政策來應對衝擊;
畢竟,國家是不同的;
在面對衝擊,可能會遭遇到不同的挑戰;
國家原則下和平夥伴關係是調整機制來保持國家繁榮的靈活性和創造新的機會,尤其是,緩和緊張局勢;
和平夥伴關係,也是國家運作來解決重大分歧;特別是,老掉牙的歷史直線;
換句話說,我們應該設計挑戰新模式的一個中國的原則和平夥伴關係;
國家原則下和平夥伴關係,能夠讓海峽兩岸進行對話,和平解決分歧和狀態的議題;
不可否認,這是兩岸關係發展的基本議題;
正因為如此,國家原則下和平夥伴關係,對我們來說是必然的;
它能夠表達雙方的意見;
國家原則和平夥伴關係,兩岸能夠進行平等談判;
在一個單一國家原則,共同追尋一個適當模式;
因為只有一個未來;
國家原則和平夥伴關係將會是可協商和明確的議題?

夥伴關係,終結歷史,分手尚且是夥伴,何必非作骨肉親

One China principle,and peaceful partnership

In longer-term,in accordance with studying experience,from various discussions,that a single national principle will be inevitables to meet many of challenges,in particular,some may said that it would be bound to fail.
If according to fail discussion,its big tactical weakness was the lack of a common partnership to sopport it.
In turn,in turn "a country two area"reflected that fact,that it was only a hictory.
Because we have never,ever,established"peaceful partnership".
It cannot denied that a single national principle will also create dialogue and compromise.In particular,some layers may lost their ability.
But,national principle will respond to changes in political,military and economic conditions.
In longer-term,combined with a lack of common partnership of national policy to respond,such as a recession.
After all,nations are differen,and meet recessions may be likely to experience different challenges.
The national principle of peaceful partnership is adjustment mechanisms to keep national prosperous of flexibility,and create new opportunities.Especially,mitigate tensions.
Also,peaceful partnership is national function which to resolve despite major differences,in particular,very oldest of histroical straight line.
In other words,we should design challenges of new pattern for One China principle,and peaceful partnership.
The national principle of peaceful partnership can give the two sides of the Taiwan Straits in dialogs,and peacefully resolving differences and status issues.
It cannot denied that these are fundamental issues in developing cross-straits relations.
Because of this,the national principle of peaceful partnership said:"it is necessary for us".
It can express both sides of opinions.
The national principle of peaceful partnership,that directing negotiations between the two sides of the Straits as equals. Under a single national principle that we are working together to seek a good way of pattern.
Because we have only one future.
The national principle of peaceful partnership will be negotiable and clear issue.

Peaceful Partnership,and Ending of history.

分手尚且是夥伴何必非作骨肉親

文章標籤

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()