窮小子冷眼輯

翻攝來自網絡

平心而論,端視,吳念真有失中云;

如僅就「民主政治」一詞來說,哪個國家沒有「旗幟鮮明」的擁護族群呢?

當然耳,也非布衣小子的專利說詞:All politics are local.是以信號顯是什麼?

「民主政治」「終結歷史」「辯論下誰受益」.然什麼是辯論?

它不相關於老掉牙的歷史,文化與哲學,或如:

辯論國家技術和競爭力,不是相互指責;

不可否認,國家技術能夠提升國家經濟成長,特別是,提高生產率;所以,辯論應該是集中在如何擴大國家技術發展在未來;

國家技術發展是建立在科技進步,這是包括,國家生產力來促進國家經濟成長和全球競爭力;

所謂共識下辯論未來國家政策的方向和領域,其目標在於創造一個新的機制和模式升級和修改必要的在特定領域的國家技術;

辯論活動創造國家技術發展政策,包括,決議和協議;

辯論活動提高中央政府的作用,但不是狡辯,其技術發展升級國家競爭力,特別是,鼓勵國家技術進步和重新啟動

Debating National technologies and competitiveness,in which,not condemn each other.

It cannot denied that National technologies are able to contribute National economic growth,in particular,productivity increases.So,debate should have focused on how to expand national technological development for the future.

National technological development would establish technological advancement,in which,are including national productivity,in order to promote national economic growth,and global competitiveness.

So-called that under the debate of consensus,in order to direction and range of national policy,in which to creat a new of mechanisms and patterns,and upgrading,and making changes and National technologies improvements as necessary.

Disputative activity has created national policy for technology development,including,resolution and agreement.

Disputative activity has been raised affecting the role of the central government,but,it was not quibble,and its technology development to upgrade the national competitiveness.In particular,how encourages national technology progress,and re-start.

也或如中國前國家主席,鄧先生有言中肯:「管什麼顏色的貓,能幫民眾抓老鼠,就是好貓」

另又舉例失當:端視已故美國前總統雷根,然真正引人深思,應該是妥協一詞---compromise;

而且compromise 可不相關於「幽默感」一詞,畢竟「幽默感」一詞,能助英國打贏福克蘭戰役嗎?

當然耳,領袖特質不是優柔寡斷,尤其是,不需要信眾;

國家元首格局保護台灣篇?

台灣雖然小,但是,中華民國還是很大;

當國家面對危機,更應該睜大眼睛來瞄一個相對薄弱的政治和經濟氣候,特別是,它可能開始變壞;

所以,關心也就是意識到風險操作;

這是民眾的責任;

回顧歷史歷程,國家曾經搖搖欲墜,但還是能應付存在的危機;

換句話說,領導者必須認為國家強大到能夠應付風險;

這是以團結來擬聚民眾的向心力;

所以,能夠肯定的是:如果,國家實力不會保持強大,但其本質來說,還是能夠帶動國家的經濟復元;

民眾可以提供幫助,甚至,美國和中國,也可以提供幫助,這就是天助自助者;

即使,中國還是很窮,美國也是很有錢,不可否認,這是轉變和挑戰;

自鄉村到城市來提供繁榮,鞏固政治穩定;

這對領導者來說,應該是韌性,而不是妄想;

所以,領導者面對危機處理,也將會加強領導者聲望和信心;

這是模式,領導者在危機前將會上升和不斷擴大影響力;

這是簡單來對比,雖然,還不是成功的領導者,但是,她已經越來越站在哪裡?

The national president of layout.
Although,Taiwan is little,but,the Republic of China is still bigger.
When nation faces crisis,even,its should be with eyes wide open to view that political and economic climate are in a relatively weak,in particular,it may begin to go bad.
So,it is well aware of care for the risks,this is responsibility to people.Step back the historical process-the nation has once shaken,but,still deal with crisis exist.
In other words,leader must thinks that nation is strong to enable the risk-this use of united to work together peoples' core force.So,to be sure,if the national power cannot unfold forward,on its own,enable to push the nation economy into a recovery.
People can help,even,China and U.S. can help,too.This what the heaven helps those who help themselves.
In spite of China is still poor,also,the US is rich,it cannot denied that its shift and challenge,from rural areas to cities to provide in prosperity that has underpinned political stability.
But the resilience of the leader is no mirage.
So,leader faces crisis management that will be pushed by leaders' reputation and confidence.
An model,leader,before the crisis,will already rising and influence expanding.
That is simpler than over,even though,she is not successful leader,but,she is more and more getting there.

另至於國家未來挑戰,不僅是,藍圖,它是戰略前瞻與部署,還是不相關於文學,或如:

國家未來挑戰是國家政綱戰略的前瞻與部署
國家戰略利益和目標
平心而論,國家,將會面臨新的危機和不穩定;
不可否認,機會也提供希望和希望必須仰賴鍛鍊;
即使,中國興起,是一個危機,但是,也往往是轉機;
所以,我們面臨著新的挑戰;
這是對國家安全和發展,相對地,應該建立安全性思維模式;
儘管如此,國家戰略,能夠反映一個擴大的國家發展,特別是面對中國;
所以,必須要了解,今天和明天的趨勢,國家發展需要來建構國家戰略;
就政治來說,關鍵問題是國家定位;
這是必須加強和說明的共同基礎-民主價值 ;
格外是,政治挑戰和分享政治道德價值觀;
另外,在軍事戰略,我們必須面對比以前更多的危機;
應該如何,思考面對新的軍事挑戰;
應該如何,發展什麼樣的能力和力量來面對國家安全;
同時,國家發展的最好模式是支持開放和包容經濟制度;
這是加強社會的穩定和國家的經濟發展和政治自由;
或是國家應該追求開放目標;
這將會是充滿很爽快;
在國際戰略環境中,在許多方面,應該是相互依存;
所以,任何在軍事上和政治上企圖孤立,不可否認,是愚昧;
在每一個層面上,國家需要具有真正的實力和影響力,包括,政治
經濟和軍事,等等;依情況而言,這是公平發展和責任;
我相信,中華民國台灣;
我知道,可能會不爽,但事實上,就是整合;
國家安全戰略,這是帶領國家安全,面對傳統威脅和增加民眾的安全
和幸福.

National strategy interests and objectives .
Obviously speaking,the nation will face new crises and instabilities.
It cannot denied that the opportunity also provide hope and depends on tempered .
In spite of the China raise ,is a crisis,but also is usually an opportunity.
So,we face new challenges .
This is only to national security and development, relatively, should build up way of thinking security pattern.
Even now,the national strategy is able to reflected a nation development of expanding,in particular,to face the China.
So,it must realized that establishing national strategy for nation development will require the trends at work today and tomorrow.
As much as political says that a key issue is national localization.
This must be on the positive common by strengthened and explained , democratic values .
Especially,political challenges and share political ethic values.
In addition of military,we have to face more dangers than those we previously faced.
We should , somehow ,think about that face these new military challenges.
We should , somehow, think about that develop these capabilities and power to face national security.
At the same time,the national development is support economic system as open and inclusive as possible as the best way .
The strengthen the growth of society and national economic development,also,the political free.
As nation,its should pursue opening objectives.
The has been replete with very sort.
In the national strategic environment ,in many ways,should interdependent each other.
So,any attempt to isolate militarily and politically , it cannot denied that it would be foolish.
The nation needs truly power with the every dimension , including , political, economic and military.
In these circumstances, this is equitably with development and a sense of our own responsibilities.
I trust the Republic of China/Taiwan.
Perhaps that I do know that will be out of sort.
In fact,to be integrated.
National political program , national security strategy that takes the national security to face more traditional threats and increasing people secure and well-being.

分隔線

平心而論,吳念真先生還是不了解它是啥死人骨頭?

或可先問諸如林中斌先生,林郁方委員等人;

再就歷史叛徒一詞,關鍵點還是中國共產黨;

尤其是:「正式宣告終結兩岸敵對狀態」這才有解!

所以關中華民國政府什麼事呢?

恩!宗教領袖?布衣小子還是較偏向達賴活佛;

他是慈祥的長者;

唉!「中國平西王政治歷史餘毒症候群」

最後「要爭氣、要成材」一詞,其實民進黨也再擺脫「歷史束縛」;

重點是1986年,才蹦出來,這就是戰略優點,沒包袱;

可以專一心思來打擊台灣鎮南王歷史餘毒症候群!

因為布衣小子很笨,還是了解政綱是啥死人骨頭?

有說明有真相:http://kudou543.pixnet.net/blog/post/36710162

簡單來說,也如李前總統有言中肯,換句話說:聯合作戰;

何時中國和台灣才能擺脫平西王與鎮南王政治歷史餘毒症候群呢?

幾十年過去了,我們還忍心政治歷史餘毒症候群,繼續:「Occupy China andTaiwan 」?
Teamwork and Team-cooperative 團隊合作
Genius and Intelligent天賦與反應
「未來框架」下「夥伴關係 」「團隊合作」「天賦與反應」;

我們一起創造「國家奇蹟」「終結歷史」共同面對「全球革命」