窮小子冷眼輯

爭議島嶼啟示錄第二版:

未來國家戰術打擊武力

六月一日二零一二年 台灣窮小子

序言:

未來的國家戰術打擊武力是提供未來三十年廣泛的國家作戰目標,或如:

一,國家戰術打擊武力,保證未來的國家承諾和夥伴關係;

二,國家戰術打擊武力,保護和反應,未來國家有利的條件;

在整個發展過程中,國家戰術打擊武力,評估,未來的技術和系統,同步地,建構指導方案;

因為我們不能預測未來的危機和威脅;

所以,必須有規劃,有靈活性的作戰武力,讓國家,能夠在特定的威脅中,迅速調遣,作有效的組合力量;

畢竟,國家戰術打擊武力是相關於幾十年的有效和全面的保護政策;

尤其是,面對無賴國家和流氓國家;

戰術打擊武力是最迫切需要,建立實用性的強大的防衛武力;

國家戰術打擊武力,也是保持領先的快速反應能力來適應預期狀況;

總之,在具體威脅的情況下,國家戰術打擊武力是以能力為基礎的作戰規劃

前言:

未來的國家戰術打擊武力的目的是,或如:流氓國家和極端歷史暴力主義者和恐怖主義者的威脅;

這可能持續地,出現在未來的國家環境中,特別是,不可預期的事件;

另外是,非國家實體或不是很強大的國家,但是,對我們有敵意?

是以,對這類非國家實體,或不是很強大的國家,就是以國家戰術打擊武力來執行全面性的防衛能力;

因為,未來的潛在對手,將會是在高喊穩定和不確定目的,範圍來操作;

是以,未來的國家戰術打擊武力的目的追尋,或如:告訴他們:

正確的歷史教訓?因為,他們攻擊我們是不擇手段;

所以,未來的國家戰術打擊武力的目的,也是,透過勸告和保證來改變緊張關係,降低威脅;

這類不相關於歷史,文化與哲學;

簡單來說,未來的國家戰術打擊武力,可能是,發現潛在衝突和盡快結束衝突,換句話說,國家目標和價值理念

國家戰術打擊武力的目標是選項,特別是,敵人的價值;

這才是打擊目標;

尤其是,極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義,或如:

一,挑選具有重大價值的對手領導;

二,鎖定大規模殺傷性武裝部署;

三,重整領導,包括,政治,經濟等控制資產;

四,建立海空軍等軍事基地,特別是,指揮,控制,情報,監視和偵察等基礎設施;

因為國家戰術打擊武力的目標是對付不同種類的敵手;

尤其是,我們有甚麼來完成?

或如:極端歷史暴力主義者和恐怖主義者的領導,其任務是顛覆和破壞國家和領導人;

是以,中央政府是計劃建立連續性的國家戰術打擊武力來處理極端歷史暴力主義者和恐怖主義者的領導能力;

有效性國家戰術打擊武力,也是國家戰略打擊能力,在未來三十年的優先選項;

這是歷史直線的角度來比較的結果:

有些目標,通常是,潛在對手,所以,我們應該有高效的作戰能力;

簡言之,整合當前的能力來面對極端歷史暴力主義者和恐怖主義者的威脅和風險;

換句話說,建構高效的作戰能力是未來的國家建議,其目的在實現最好的國土安全戰略;

尤其是,如蔡英文所倡:國家選項;

最好的和有效性國家戰術打擊武力是提供未來,可靠的,靈活的國家戰術層級;

其也包括,全球範圍內的共識;

如果,沒有加強國家能力和建立系統,可能要說再見?

歷史直線下的戰術打擊行動的美中不足是眾所周知:

簡單來說,戰術打擊行動需要進行整合和強化;

換句話說,戰術打擊行動來滿足和支持夥伴的信心;

同時,應對未來的國家標準;

不可否認,戰術打擊行動來承擔國家的計劃能力來進行整合作戰;

因為成功的打擊行動,應該鼓勵來發展

戰術打擊行動,不僅是,傳統理念,也是,未來的技術交流;

尤其是,不相關於歷史,文化與哲學

(第一章)

戰術打擊武力是提供一個確定的國家目標來戰勝極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義的威脅;

特別是,以民眾的生活為優先防衛;

簡單來說,這類是未來與當前的國家目標;

或可能是,先進的操作理念?

這是不論,在未來和中長期性的不確定因素;

換句話說,如何面對未來的安全環境;

尤其是,重整國家傳統的戰術打擊武力;

因為這可能是幾十年的國家安全考量;

國家政策的目的是穩定和強化夥伴關係的合作;

然而,在爭議島嶼上,重點是,非對抗性關係,格外是,流氓國家;

簡單來說,戰術打擊武力的目的是取代;

而以新模式的軍事合作來面對安全挑戰,然後,創造一個和平的安全環境?

台灣面對緊張局勢,應該尋求與美國和中國的合作;

這是不相關於歷史,文化與哲學;

因為這類不會告訴我們甚麼是加強合作?

甚至,不會幫助我們打贏極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義的威脅;

畢竟,在未來二十年到三十年激進的極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義,可能進行改變來攻擊未來的安全環境?

是以,成功地重整和運用戰術打擊武力來預防區域流氓的雄心壯志;

只有這樣,我們方能防止防止流氓的攻擊,尤其是,驅動夥伴的合作!

一,其實,沒有其他的能力,能夠完全取代國家的技術基礎;

簡單來說,它是終結歷史的轉變;

特別是,擁有,有效性的國家戰術武力;

當然耳,這不是軍事競爭,或是安全保證;

關鍵的,可能是與夥伴的合作關係,以保證來對付潛在性的威脅與危機;

簡單來說,謹慎的部署是一個重要的國家未來準備工作;

因為,現實上,國家戰術武力是夥伴合作關係來強化與面對未來的安全挑戰;

重點是:極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義.可能頑固地擴散衝突;

這對長期性國家的安全環境和利益,來不確定性的穩定;

換句話說,是很危險;

畢竟,至少,未來二十年建立國家戰術武力,不再是一個例外;

因此建立國家戰術武力應該成為可能的廣泛的未來趨勢和視域來發送國家信號

國家戰術武力應該有其戰略定義和選項

首先是強化國家戰術打擊能力支持國家行動尤其是面對流氓的極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義

第二是國家戰術打擊能力說明保證安全環境的重要性

是以國家戰術打擊能力將是繼續提供國家能力來面對持續變化的威脅與危機

二,今天,極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義有其歷史淵源;

簡單來說,他們是最聰明的演員是以真的結束恐怖嗎?不,全然不;

換句話說,這類相關於未來的國家安全環境;

尤其是,潛在性的狀況模擬,因為我們不能預測未來;

國家和極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義的衝突是其利用老掉牙歷史,文化結構來達成他們的戰略企圖;

所以,這是對國家和國土安全的挑戰,格外是,無法無天戰略企圖;

然後,破壞民眾的團結心;

因為我們已經知道這是無法無天戰略企圖,又可能是個人暴力運動,來追尋其革命目標;

是以,我們可以希望,技術將有一個有效作用來面對流氓,和阻止未來出現新的危機和威脅;

簡單來說,這是改革;

最後那,麼我們應該集中發展國家戰術武力來面對突發狀況;

換句話說,國家權力

(第二章)

前言:

放眼未來三十年,我們能夠瞄到的前景發展,不是很有可能;

這是不論中,國或是美國,打擊武力是挑戰和聯合國家能力;

雖然,這讓人感覺很不爽,但它是國家利益在未來;

畢竟,沒有人能夠預測,對戰在未來三十年是甚麼模式?

然爾,面對未來的區域現實,我們必須提出一個具體的作戰模式來調整國家力量,進而滿足,未來的國家需求;

這是在國家規劃基礎上的轉移能力;

換句話說,它將有助於國家在能力範圍內的尋求發展;

換隻眼來瞄,國家能力如何打擊流氓?

此外,國家能力是符合國家邏輯和利益;

我的意思是:國家應該了解維持區域穩定與和平,不允許被極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義所攻擊;

因為極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義,真的很過分;

是以,我們應該要求國家維持戰術打擊武力;

它是國家政策和能力,在未來三十年,特別是,對付勒索!

其實,打擊武力是國家手段;

特別是,保護國家的報復行為;

這類不相關於歷史,文化與哲學;

簡單來說,雄心壯志,它讓國家能夠追尋地位-自由;

特別是,當我們面對流氓和衝突?

國家必須有能力來指定要求模式的戰術打擊能力;

尤其是,平台投射力量;

換句話說,國家基礎能力,當它擁有機會去作-人不犯我,我不犯人;

是以中國國防部耿雁生大校有言中肯:人不犯我,我不犯人;

雄心壯志是反擊流氓和衝突的能力,同時,以雙贏模式來取得穩定;

我們必須思考如,何反擊流氓和衝突,尤其是,非國家敵人;

因為,其很喜歡說歷史和文化等等來挑撥,顛覆;

所以,打擊武力是國家關鍵能力;

肯定的是,其對流氓和衝突具有強大的報復能力,也是,國家和民眾的期望;

其實,打擊武力是具有未來重要的戰略定義在國家;

因為,在未來三十年,流氓和衝突將持續地,挑戰國家權力;

這是很簡單地來預測;事實上,我們現在所面對的是機會,打擊武力是穩固國家與夥伴之間的合作基礎上的共同利益和責任;

換句話說,打擊武力是國家承諾與保護理念,特別是,密切的夥伴關係;

格外是,國家優勢以透過說明來支持目標;

是以,未來國家規劃的戰術打擊武力,可能是:

一,國家能夠有效打擊,什麼類型的作戰目標?

二,未來國家規劃的戰術打擊能力是甚麼?

簡單來說,關鍵原則:重整國家戰術打擊武力模式;

尤其是,終結歷史的定義,未來的國家環境和作戰目標要求;

終結歷史的定義:

終結歷史被定義為進行國家操作,在未來進程,堅決地改變,極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義的威脅與挑戰;

尤其是,在相對的時間進程內,採取的作戰行動;

簡單來說,或如:

國家決心和作戰行動,可能改變敵人的行動;

國家決心和作戰行動,是直接影響的戰略與戰術部署能力;

國家決心和作戰行動,打擊敵人的作戰能力和降低不必要的歷史爭議和強化,指揮,管制和情報作戰能力;

斬首是最高的戰術指導原則;

國家決心和作戰行動,將可能影響敵人選擇;

特別是,國家力量投射,認真地面對流氓和衝突;

是以執行終結歷史的戰略任務是了解其價值和結構

這不是幾天或幾個月的作戰行動;

換句話說,國家決心和作戰行動的打擊武力是支持和相互關聯性戰略性打擊,極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義,與其相關的作戰目標;

在整個歷史直線時期,戰術與戰略打擊武力是國家決心和作戰行動的代名詞;

今天,它是能夠執行精確的打擊武力;

精確的打擊武力,能夠決定所影響的選項;

尤其是,未來的極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義,因為它捫是流氓;

總之,決心和作戰行動的打擊武力是一個實力在國家!

結論:

平心而論,未來的國家戰術打擊武力是說明未來新理念的國家戰略能力;

這是不相關於歷史,文化與哲學;

簡單來說,它是一個整體的國家未來作戰能力,其關鍵原則,可能是如:

一,未來的國家規劃,必須以能力和模式來轉移,尤其是,面對極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義的威脅;

二,未來的國家戰術打擊武力是集中姿態;

簡單來說,國家嚇阻能力,同時,強化國家的夥伴關係,共同地擊敗極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義的威脅;

換句話說,這是國家未來的議程;

大概,如馬總統有言:三角形 - 平衡,協同與活力;

所以,肯定的是戰術打擊武力,仍然是一個重要的未來的議程,尤其是,處理夥伴關係;

它還要求以技術和能力的視域來發展自己的嚇阻能力:告訴我們的夥伴,未來的安全關係和利益;

對我們和我們的夥伴保證在我們的安全環境,仍然是一個重要因素 - 鼓勵國家夥伴關係;

同樣地,強化全球合作與穩定,共同地擊敗極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義的威脅;

因為,它也強調夥伴角色;

戰術打擊武力是保證性和可靠性的嚇阻擴展能力

總之,保證需要戰術打擊武力的靈活性來尋求未來的國家優勢 -

未來的技術需求和嚇阻能力來擊敗極端歷史暴力主義和恐怖主義

Edition two - Distuped island implications : The future national tactics strike forces.

Foreword:

Future national tactics strike forces will provide the 30-year future with a broad range of national strike objective.As followed:
1,National tactics strike forces promises  of future national commitment and partnership.
2,National tactics strike forces protect and deal with future on terms favorable to the nation.
In overall the development process,national tactics strike forces assessed future technologies and systems.Step by step,establishes guide the proposal.
Because we cannot stick out the crisis and threat,so,must have a flexible approach to operative forces,in which,in order to enables nation - can mix of forces rapidly effectiveness,in the specific threat.
After all,national tactics strike forces will be related to effective and comprehensive protection of policy in many decades.
Especially,we meet rogue countries and ruffians - national tactics strike forces will be the most urgent to build - practical,strong of defense forces.
Also,national tactics strike forces keeps ahead of rapid reactions capability-adapt to anticipate status.
To sum up,from threat-specific scenarios,national tactics strike forces will be capabilities-based approach to operative planning.

Preface:

For the purposes of future national tactics strike forces,as followed that threats of rogues countries and people all who are historical violence extremism and terrorism.
It may everlastingly show the future national environment,in particular,unexpected spectrum.
In addition,non-countries,or not powerful countries.But,they do have hostile to us.
In order to these of non-countries,or not powerful countries,which will use national tactics strike forces to execute comprehensive defenses capabilities.
Because potential future adversaries will keep the range of stability and uncertain purpose to operate them.
In order to the purposes of future national tactics strike forces will seek,as followed:Tell them:Exact historical lessons.
Because they attack us by whatever means.
So,the purposes of future national tactics strike forces will be also through dissuasion and assurance,in which,in order to change intensive relations,reduce threats.
They are not related to history,culture,and philosophy,so on.
Simply put,future national tactics strike forces may find potential conflicts,and end  the conflict as quickly as possible we can.
In other words,national objectives and values.

Summary:

National tactics strike forces goals are options,in particular,known to be of significant value of adversary.
This is still strike target.
Especially,historical violence extremism and terrorism.As followed:
1,To choose that known to be of significant value  who known to be of significant value to the leadership.
2,To lock forces of mass destruction deployment.
3,To regrate leadership,including,leadership - political and economic of control assets.
4,To build bases of operations for Naval,Air-force,in particular,command, control, intelligence,surveillance, and reconnaissance ,so on;infrastructures.
Because goals of national tactics strike forces attacks different types of adversaries,especially, we have to be able to accomplish?
For example,such as,leaderships of historical violence extremism and terrorism which missions will subvert and destroy country and leader.
In order to central government which with an established continuity of national tactics strike forces,and dealing with historical violence extremism and terrorism of leaderships.
Effectiveness of national tactics strike forces will also be  national strategics strike forces of priority option.
This is historical strategic line point of view,comparing the results.
Some of targets are usually to potential adversaries,so we should have effectiveness of operative capability.
Simply put,we integrate currently of capabilities to meet historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats and risks.
In other words,establishes effectiveness of operative capability will be national recommendations.in which,in order to its goal,achieve best homeland security strategy.
Especially,as Ms.蔡英文 said that:"options for the National".
The best,and effectiveness of national tactics strike forces will provide reliable,flexible of national tactical-level for the future,also,including,on a global scale of common consensus.
It may be kissed that good bye,if we are not for strengthen on the national capabilities?
The deficiencies in historical straight line of tactics strike operations are well known:
Simply put,tactics strike operations needs to be integrated and intensified.
In other words,tactics strike operations will meet and support partners confidence,in a while,to response national standred for the future.
It cannot denied that tactics strike operations will bear national program,capability,and conduct integrated with operations.
Because of success with strike operations should encourage as the development.
Tactics strike operations not only conventional ideas,also,future of technological exchanges
Especially,they not related to history,culture,and philosophy.

Chapter one:The future national tactics strike forces.

Tactics strike forces provides a starting point of national objectives,and attacks historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats,in prticular,to people life has been defense priority.
Simply put,these are future and current of national objectives.Or,it can be advanced for concepts of operations.
These no matter what uncertainties conditions in the future and longer,medium-term.
In other words,how to meet the future security environment?
Especially,to re-start nations' conventional tactics strike forces.
Because of they will be possibly  national security measured in many decades.
The goals of national policy are stable and renewed for partnership cooperative,yet,focus on  non-adversarial relationship with disputed islands.Especially,rogue countries.
Simply put,the aim of tactics strike forces is to replace,than,use as new pattern of military cooperation to meet security challenges and thus to create a peaceful security environment.
Tensions over Taiwan meets,which should seek cooperations with U.S. and China.
They are not related to history,culture,and philosophy,so on.
Because of those cannot tell us what the Strengthening cooperation is?Even,they cannot help us to win historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats.
After all,over the next 20 to 30 years,radical historical violence extremism and terrorism will be transformed by change,than,attacks security environment in the future.
In order to be successful re-start and operate tactics strike forces which prevents ambitions by regional rogue.
We might be the only way to prevent rogue attacks,especially,drives cooperations among partners.

1,In fact,no other capability can replace fully to nation's technical foundation.
Simply put,it is ending of history with transitions,in particular,we own national tactics strike forces of effectiveness.
Of course,it is not military competition.Or,secure promise.
The key may be cooperative relationship with partners,in which,in order to use as promise to deal with such potential threats and crises.
Simply put,careful deployment will be an important
national preparations for the future.
Indeed,because of national tactics strike forces is cooperative partnership which intensify and face security challenges for the future.
The focus is that historical violence extremism and terrorism may be persistently to widespread conflicts.
In longer-term,there will bring uncertainties stability for national security  environment and interest.
In other words,it could be more dangerous.
After all,not least,in the future of two decades,establishes national tactics strike forces no longer be an exception.
Thus, establishes national tactics strike forces should become possible,broad trends of future,and vision,in which,in order to send our own national signals.
National tactics strike forces should have their strategic implications and options.
At first,we must be to strengthen national tactics strike capabilities that can support national actions.
Especially,to meet historical violence extremism and terrorism of rogue.

Second,national tactics strike capabilities explains that promising the importance of security environment.
In order to giving national tactics strike capabilities will be continue to provide national capabilities,and we meet developing threats and crises.

2,Today,historical violence extremism and terrorism are own their historical source.
Simply put,they are the smartest actors.
In order to be really end of terrorist,is not it?No,not at all.
In other words,these are related to the future national security environment,especially,potential imitative conditions.
Because we cannot predict future.
Conflicts are in opposition to nation and historical violence extremism and terrorism,which take an advantage of very oldest history and culture framework to reach their strategic intentions.
So,it challenges national,homeland security,especially,strategic  intentions of anarchic,and than,destroy peoples' cohesion.
Because we have known them,who explain strategic  intentions of anarchic,also,might be violent individuals,and seek revolutionary goals of their own.
As we can hope that technology will have a beneficial effect to meet rogues,and stop threats and crises the future emergence of new ones.
Simply put,this is change.
Finally, then, we should focus on national tactics strike forces to meet contingencies.
In other words,this is national power.

Chapter two:The future national tactics strike forces.
Preface:

Moving ahead to the three decades for the future,we can see such perspective of development as unlikely.This no matter what the China,nor U.S.,and strike forces will have the combination and challenge to national capability.Although,it gives people feel out of sort,but,it will be national interest  for the future.After all,no one can predict what the situation three decades into the future?

Yet,we must present a specific pattern of operation,and we can adjust national forces in the regional reality for the future,and than,meet future national demands.

This shifts from capabilities as the the basis of national planning.
In other words,it will help nation be seeking to develop in the range of capabilities.
From this perspective,how national capability to attack "rogue” ?
Moreover, national capability lays out national logic and interest.
Simply put,just remember right historical lessons,in which,in order to seeking and operating national tactics strike forces.
I mean that the Nation should understand will keep regional stability and peace,and its not allowed to attack by historical violence extremism and terrorism.
Because of historical violence extremism and terrorism have been really excessively.
As we should ask nation to keep our tactics strike forces.
They are national policies and capabilities in three decades for the future.
In particular,we will deal with blackmail.
Reason is beginning:
In fact,tactics strike forces are national means,in particular,which protects country from acts of retaliation.
They are not related to history,culture,and philosophy.
Simply put,I would said :a word of "ambitious",which make nation can seek status - free.
In particular,when we face rogues and conflicts.
Nation must have the ability to target pattern of tactics strike capabilities,especially,platforms forces.
In other words,national infrastructure ability,when it owns an opportunity to do so - I do not bully people whose does not bully us.
In order to China's Defense of Department of general 耿雁生's explanation was exactly right : I do not bully people whose does not bully us.
Ambitious strikes back rogues and conflicts of capabilities,in a while,we will use as "double-win" pattern to gain stability.
We must considered how to strike back rogues and conflicts,especially,non-state adversaries.
Because of them whom enjoys,and speaks history and culture to incite and subvert us.
So,tactics strike forces are key of national abilities.
To be sure,they against rogues and conflicts with powerful from capabilities of retaliation.Also,they will desire nation and people.
In fact,strike forces has important strategic definition for the future,in the nation.
Because of over the next three decades,rogues and conflicts will continually challenge national powers.This can simply to anticipate.
Indeed,we now meet opportunity,and strike forces will stable cooperation between nation and partners all who on the
basis of common interests and responsibilities.
In other words,strike forces are the ideas of national commitment and protection,in particular,closer partnership.
Especialy,it will be national superiority,in which,in order to through explanation to be intended to support goals.
In order to future of national planning of tactics strike forces,which may be,as followed:
1,What kinds of operative goals will the nation be able to strike effectively?
2,What the tactics strike forces will be future of national planning?

Chapter two:The future national tactics strike forces.

Conclusion:

Simply put,the key principles that re-start the modes of national tactics strike forces.
Especially,defining ending history,the future national environment and operative targets demands.
Defining ending of history.
Ending of history is defined as national operation for the future,in which,in order to change historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats and challenges ; especially, operative action in a relative period of time. :Simply put,as followed:
National determination and operative action may change adversary’s of action.
National determination and operative action are directly impacting strategic and tactics deployed capabilities.
National determination and operative action attacks adversary’s operative capabilities,and reduces unnecessary of historical disputions,and intensifies command,control and intelligent operative capabilities.
Decapitate is the most highest of tactics guiding principle.
National determination and operative action will be designed to influence the choices  made by the adversary.
In particular,national force projection.
So,we have to be seriously to meet rogues and conflicts.
As we are carrying out strategic mission to ending of history,that  requires
understanding what the adversary values and structures.
These are not operative actions,in days, or months .
In other words,national determination and operative action of strike forces are supporting,and strategically interconnected strikes historical violence extremism and terrorism with their  related operative-targets.
Throughout the historical staight line times,strategic and tactic strike forces were synonymous with National determination and operative action.
Today,it can execute precise strike forces.
Precise strike forces can  decisively affect the options,especially,we face future historical violence extremism and terrorism,all whom are causing of rogues.
In short, determination and operative action of strike forces will be forces in the nation.

Conclusion:

Obviously speaking,the future national tactics strike forces have elaborated new ideas to the nation’s strategic capabilities for the future.
They are not related to history,culture,and philosophy.
Simply put,it taken as a whole,future national operative capabilities,which key principles may be as:
1,Future national planning must shift from capabilities-patterned. Especially,we face  historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats.
2,Future national tactics strike forces must focus on posture ; simply put ,just national deterrent  capabilities.
At the same time,we intensify national partnership,in which,in order to working together to defeat historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats.
In other words,this will be national agenda for the future.
Perhaps that,as Mr.President.Ma has said:" Iron triad" - balance,vitality and synergy.
So,to be sure, tactics strike forces remains an important agenda for the future.Especially,it will deal with partnership.
It needs also that we use as  technical and power perspective to developing our national deterrent capabilities.
We are telling about future security relationship and interests with our partners.
Assuring us,and our partners,all who are in our security environment remains an important conditions - encouraging national partnership.
Likewise,we intensify global cooperation and stability,in which,in order to defeat historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats.Because of its underscores the role partners.
Tactics strike forces are guarantee and credibility of extended deterrent capabilities.

In sum,assurance needs tactics strike forces of flexibility,in which,in order to seek national superiority - technical needs and deterrent capabilities of future to defeat historical violence extremism and terrorism of threats.

The end