台灣窮小子瞥國家核能的未來發展與安全性問題

nuclear_power_plant  

序:小子本布衣,布衣說明,不是有意頂撞民進黨與蔡英文;因為李前總統登輝先生說得最好:非什麼非,又不是不能解決!

03022013 Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子

734567_10151474521154198_1921626611_n  

雖然,在台灣的能源部署定義並沒有改變;
但,從基本上來說,台灣的國家能源戰略定義的改變與安全問題必須重新自基本定義改寫;
這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
端視過去的全球歷史,核能是強大的國家戰略力量的基礎與能源組合;
特別是,維持國家能源部署足夠的規模和質量!
然耳,頑固的歷史與文化的破壞,核能的重要性已經發生極端性的變化;
作為國家能源部署來說,能源部署並不重要,但以傳統智慧來聲明:國家能源部署的重要性;
這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
國家核能戰略力量的降低將顯示國家技術能力的減少,特別是,削弱國家產業作戰能力;
我們能夠了解頑固的歷史與文化,但是,它在未來是不樂觀;
因為不論當前與未來,國家能源是需要技術整合與資金才能完成;
我們面對未來與傳統的能源縱深打擊的挑戰與威脅;
是以,也將不得不面對核能力量的重新部署;
這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
因為未來能源將仰賴新技術的影響來發揮作用,另一方面,在核能安全意外,帶來了新的挑戰,這是考驗國家能源部署的作戰能力;
所以,在當前的狀況下,核能部署辯護時,容易受到比過去幾十年來頑固的歷史與文化的攻擊;
伴隨著未來技術改變,將會強化顯著的核能脆弱性;
安全來自科學家與工程師的努力,而不是頑固的歷史與文化!
因為風險對峙解決不了問題!
國家核能部署是重要的,它是技術帶來便宜,便利與安全;
他們是國家能源部署持久的一部分,未來的能源藍圖!
對抗是不太可能看到新模式的能源安全環境!
每一個技術改變,都有不同的願景;
但是,頑固的歷史與文化沒有;
同時,國家儲備不足,也反映在廢料問題!
換句話說,核能安全意外,提供更大的透明度與共同地面對複雜的問題;
特別是,涉及全球核能安全夥伴關係與合作機會!
總之,這類技術改變的表現形式是建立在機制,而不是頑固的歷史與文化對抗陰影!
今天,全球能源與安全環境,早已經發生變化!
但鑒於緊張的國家經濟模式,我們面對的核能安全,甚至,廢料處理,將越來越決定在國家安全戰略;
這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
今天,核能不構成威脅;
頑固的歷史與文化才是非常重要的威脅角色與背景!

謝謝!

33563557.JPG  

台灣窮小子 is viewing national nuclear power development and security issues for the future.
03022013 Copyrighted @
台灣窮小子

While the energy deployed definitions in the Taiwan have not changed,but,as extremely as in speaking,Taiwan's national energy strategic-definition of change and secure issues must be re-written by fundamantal definition,which are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
According with the past of global history,nuclear power was the greatest national strategic-force of fundation,and energy component.In particular,they were maintaining national energy deployment of sufficient size and quality.
However,stubborn of history and culture of desolation,and the importance of the nuclear power has changed extremely.
As national energy deployment noted,that it is not as important,but ,as conventional wisdom to state national energy depolyment of importance.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
The decline of national nuclear-power strategic-force will show the reduced nations' technologucal capabilities.In particular,reduced nations' industrial of war-fighting capabilities.
We can understand stubborn of history and culture ideas,but,it will be  less optimistic in the future.Because of no matter what the current and future,national energies needs tevhnological integrations and  fundings to complete.
We face of such future and  conventional energy deep-strike challenge and threat,so,as we will also have to respond with nuclear forces of re-deployment.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Because of future energy will depend on the impact of new technologies that play role.On the one hand,by accident of nuclear secirity,they would bring new challenge,which tests national energy deployment of war-fighting capability.
So,under the current sutuation,nuclear deployment is to defend itself when it is more vulnerable to stubborn of history and culture attack than it has been for many decades.
With the future technological change,that will intensify significant of the nuclear power vulnerability.Security comes from scientists and engineers of efforts,rather than stubborn of history and culture.
Because of risk from stand-off cannot resolve problems.
National nuclear power deployment is  as significant as it brings cheap,convenience and security.
They are an indelible part of the national energy deployment energy blue print of the future.
We cannot see such conflicts as unlikely in the new pattern of energy security environment.
Each technological changes have different visions,but,stubborn of history and culture are not.At the same time,national reserve are inadequate, reflected in nuclear waste dumping problems.
In other words,accident of nuclear secirity is to provide biggest  transparency,and we are working togehter to face complex problems,in particular,involving global nuclear power security partnership with cooperative opportunities.
In short,manifestation of this technological change is to build mechanism,rather than,stubborn of history and culture of conflicted shadow.
Today,global energy and security environment have already been changed.
But,given tensional nations' economic mode we facing nuclear power security,even,radioactive waste disposal,that will increasingly determine to national security strategy.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Today,nuclear power cannot make threat up,and stubborn of history and culture are still the important threaten role and background.

Thank you!

    文章標籤

    國家核能

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()