想一想:Ray格友的納悶:擁核聲音(有圖有真相篇)

有圖有真相 2  

本報告僅是回應:台灣痞客邦Ray格友的納悶

581689_10151504758439198_1109984454_n  

已知條件:

一,為何都沒擁核的聲音?來源如下:
http://kudou543.pixnet.net/blog/post/38810581

網友Ray 說:

1,容我提醒,會發生服務技術問題,就是因為陳水扁停工。而且這都是歷史
不知道為什麼你很恨歷史,大概是台灣教育失敗。以古為鏡是智慧的。
2,林辰的記錄片沒說清楚一件事。
核四目前只所以要不到GE的產品服務品質保證。
是因為政府停工造成的違約。那是陳水扁做的。
核四之所以拖宕造成浪費,不是原先企畫的問題。而是反對核能作為能源政策選項之一的外行一直搞民粹的結果。
我認為林辰應該去向「監督核四媽媽」們請命去監督那些太陽能奸商,才是真正愛台灣。才是真正監督台灣的永續。

窮小子說:

也是有圖有真相!或如:http://kudou543.pixnet.net/blog/post/38782739

說那麼多,但端視兩位網友的共同點是:就是陳水扁做的!真的五年了!還真是甚麼狗屁倒灶的話語:就是陳水扁做的!
砲了一推國家未來能源部署,又真的是陳水扁做的?

當然網友王大師與Ray,窮小子能體諒您們,因為我也是這麼笨過!事實上
台灣兩千萬民眾都沒有錯,這就是: Stupid of history and culture!

窮小子說:
核能,一如女人,永無止盡的動力,雖然危險,但是,啟動我們的未來部署!
女人與核能是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
最後是,我們應該重新認識核能的國家戰略定義;
這將極大地降低危險吸引力;
核能部署以作為解決全球能源和環境挑戰的一個國家重大選項!
這類是不相關於古老的歷史與文化

窮小子向來不喜歡頑固的歷史與文化的涎/口水!實話實說,也是有圖有真相!


nuclear_power_plant  734567_10151474521154198_1921626611_n  

 

窮小子看未來​​核電與台灣的聯繫?
Copyrighted @
台灣窮小子 03112013

未來​​核電和台灣的聯繫台灣-窮小子,對於當前與未來的核能,這和過去的全球冷戰思維聯結,有一個積極的標誌!

有人認為:核能和未來台灣是不相容;

因為全球冷戰思維聯結是堅決否定的主觀意識;

於此,我有簡單的想法,以終結歷史的必要性來分析核能?

台灣窮小子的想法是客觀的

我的說明是:總合我們都知道的核能知識,簡單來說,清楚的分辨基礎;

因為,對大多數人來說,核能僅是來自核武器的資訊;

特別是,誤解什麼是濃縮鈾一詞?

換句話說,就是中華民國前總統陳水扁先生的錯!

即使是,核反應爐燃燒,幾乎是100%的U-235;

這是有效地使用原則,不可否認,也是應用在武器上;

通常來說,台灣核能輕水反應爐,僅是使用3.5-5.0%濃縮鈾;

而不相關於日本,格外是,蘇聯所使用的核能反應爐!

核武器說明不是我的目的,而且,我也不允許,但我看來;

我相信,台灣反核團體與民眾是徹底.相信在這一點上-核武器,而不是核能電力操作!

所以,這是一個特別的主要潛在問題;

不過,這個問題已經存在,在一定程度上,難以排除;

只有透明與公開的說明,才能解決爭議!

畢竟,核能提供全球運用的電力,大概有30%;

換句話說,全球能源消耗量是不充分使用核能,如果,核能提供未來全球能源需求?

因為,終結歷史的發展,可以管理核能在全球範圍內,將被認為是需要的,以達到可以接受的生活標準,而不是頑固的歷史與文化!

最佳的解決模式是透明與公開的交代,並預防,其不作為暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義的攻擊與擴散;

簡單來說,重點是在全面性,重新考量核能安全與強化部署問題,而不是,限制在古老的冷戰思維!

還有一個關注是:一個失敗的核能系統將會發生什麼事呢?

哪一個國家願意接受呢?

更特別的是,只有頑固的歷史與文化,才沒有良好的安全承諾!

另外是,沒有一套能源系統,不會產生廢物在全球;

然耳,處理是決定在技術,而不是頑固的歷史與文化,特別是,在當前與未來的全球環境中;

這是荒謬的堅持,或如:台灣窮小子喜歡蔡英文,但頑固的歷史與文化就是荒謬的;

格外是,廢物處理的研究和開發,並發現其有限的領土範圍內的處置,不相關於頑固的歷史與文化!

因此,台灣的核能未來是,窮小子的建議是終結歷史的原則,以提供誠實的評估;

與核電廠發生事故的機率和風險,同時,降低人為意外事件傷害!

中央政府,準備授權,具有競爭力的國家能源儲備機制,或如:替代能源電力系統!

終結歷史的原則以指導未來的國家核能策略與決策,特別是,鼓勵分散式的能源部署,尤其是,國家能源儲備機制;

這是未來能源選項,不相關於頑固的歷史與文化!

簡單來說,國家承諾!

台灣沒有核能?當然,不,如果,危機與風險老老實實的承認與承諾?而不是死捧頑固的歷史與文化!

總之,窮小子的判斷是明確的可能性?

Thank you!

207378_10151471243964198_94056513_n 30000  

台灣窮小子  viewing the future of nuclear power and Taiwan can be  linked?

Studied @ Copyrighted by 台灣窮小子 03112013

Can future of nuclear power and Taiwan be linked?台灣窮小子 with regard to current and future of nuclear power and for past of Global Cold War Concept  connection has a positive sign,for some thinks that nuclear power and future Taiwan  are incompatible.

Because of Global Cold War Concept is strongly negative to the ideology,in here,I do have simply idea,that use as ending of history necessity to analyze nuclear power?

台灣窮小子 of idea is objective.

My explanation is widely known aspects of nuclear power,simply put,in order to make clear the fundamental for opinions
Because of the most people,nuclear power informations comes from its relations to nuclear weapons.

In particular,they misunderstand what a word of enriched uranium?

In other words,it was being wrong by the R.O.C.former president Mr.Chen.

In spite of nuclear reactors that burn almost 100% U-235,which is effectively to used principle,

so,it cannot denied that is itself applied on weapon-usable.

In general.Taiwan's nuclear power light-water reactors just use enriched uranium to 3.5-5.0% U-235,

so,not related to Japan,especially,not being reactors-operated by the Soviet Union,

Nuclear weapons explaitions are not my purpose,besides,nor am I permitted,but,in my opinion,

I believe that Taiwan's Anti-nuclear groups and people who are thoroughly convinced on this point-nuclear weapons,

rather than nuclear power electric operation.

So,this is one unique and major potential problem,but,this problem exists already,

and to an extent difficult to eliminate,jsut transparent and open explanations will be still solve disputation.

After all,nuclear power supplies about 30% of the electrical energy used in worldwide.

In other words,global consumption of energy is not sufficiently to nuclear power,

if nuclear power provide global energy demands for the future?

Because of ending of history development can manage with nuclear power in the worldwide,that will generally believed be agreeable to achieve an acceptable standard of living,rather than,stubborn of history and culture.

The best of solution is transparent and open information,and prevent its becomes to historical-cultural violence extremism and terrorism attack and proliferation.

Simply put,the focus on the comprehensive re-consider nuclear security and intensified-deployment problems,rather than,limited in the age-old of Cold War concept.

There one concern is that what happens with a failed nuclear power system?

Which countries willing to do?

More particularly,just stubborn of history and culture are still no the best of srcure commitment?

Another is that there did not have a energy system that cannot bring about  waste in the worldwide,however,disposal is determining to technology,rather than,stubborn of history and culture.

In particular, it is ridiculous to insist.

For example,such as,台灣窮小子 loves 蔡英文,so,unfortunately,it is ridiculous to stubborn of history and culture.

Especially,waste disposal each do the research and development and find within its limited territory,

which are not related to stubborn of hustory and culture.
Moreover,窮小子 recommendations for the future of Taiwan's nuclear power is ending of history principle,that provide honest assessment with  nuclear power plant accident probabilities and risks,at the same time,reduce man-made accident injuries.

The central government is to prepare authorized competitive national energy reserves mechanisms,such as:renewable power systems.

Ending of history principle is in order to guide future national nuclear power strategy and decision-making.In particular,encourage distributed energy deployments.

Especially,national energy reserves mechanisms.

This is energy option,and not related to stubborn of history and culture.

Simply put,it is national commitment.

Can Taiwan without nuclear power?Of course not!

If the crises and risks are honestly acknowledged and committed ?

Nor holding stupid of history and culture!

In short,窮小子 judgment is an unequivocal "possibility"!

謝謝您!
3007

作戰建議:
第三條路來說::「徹底清查、全面改善」Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子

因應未來全球能源改變,中華民國不跟隨其他先進國家政策,但樂意接納來自能源安全合作!
首先,國家元首頒布緊急命令,並取得立法院授權,成立國家能源特種委員會;
會員不包括,歷史,文化,社會,哲學領域的學人,尤其是,排除在外,或僅是,列席旁聽;
第二是,國防部動員:以國防大學為主力作戰單位,全面檢查既有核電廠;
第三是,國家安全局出擊:徹查暴力歷史與文化極媏與恐怖主義,藉機破壞社會穩定;
第四是,中央調查局出動:偵查全國政商能源利益輸送鏈,必要時,會同外交部,擴大全球追擊!
第五是,內政部全面查核:核電廠範圍內兩百公里的國土,避免讓投機集團趁機炒作!

 

 
 

    文章標籤

    擁核聲音

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()