格殺令-保護漁民策略

kick ass screw up 1  

Nothing compared to the stupid of hostory and culture!

THE STRATEGIC PROTECTING-FISHERMEN OF KILL AUTHORITY OF THE LAW.
Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子 05112013

Taiwan's fisherman were shooting(Taiwan News,May seventh,2013),the crack of machine gun shots and fishermen have no choice,so what is the life-security and-death struggle ensured.
So-called kill authority of the law is explained that nation provides protection for people,in particular,secret service.
These are facing unexpected events that could occur during a real-life,we protect prople of national mission.These are not related to the history and culture.
The kill authority of the law said that:"our mission are our homeland to protect people from any model of attack,at the same time,we must be able to anticipate any type of  attack that could come up."
Because of no one world feel sort to check their emotional wound-one case,our fishermen have been killed,one ripped ugly history and culture.
So,kill authority of the law in way of doing things is to mean that protect with peoples' security for understanding of national security.
In spite of context of conflict,nation keep the right to defense of kill authority of the law in the event of an armed attack.
These are not related to the history and culture.
Simply put,defense of kill authority of the law is Taiwan owning national sovereign right to meeting military force against other countries,in particular,hooliganism countries.This right seeks to reduce the hooliganism countries to use force against Taiwan
These are not related to the history and culture.
According with historical experiences have proved that every countyies have own rights protests about this “extraordinary outrage”,at the same time,demanded an apology and reparations.
So,kill authority of the law is necessary and justified of self-defense force,in which,in order to effectively invoking the right to protect peoples' security.
Finally,kill authority of the law is necessity,also,provides an adequate law's framework to protect people and govern its use.
The point is that President Ma would really understand the tactical definition of kill authority of the law?Of course not!Absolutely not!
These are not related to the history and culture.

946977_10151668430200719_1125882208_n

格殺令-保護漁民策略
Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子 05112013

台灣漁民被槍殺(台灣新聞,2013年五月七日)-爆裂的機槍射擊,漁民無奈的聲音;
甚麼是確保生命安全與和死亡的鬥爭?
所謂的格殺令說明是國家為民眾,提供保護,特別是,秘密保護;
這是面對可能發生的突發事件,在現實生活中,保護民眾的國家任務;
這類是不相關於歷史與文化!
格殺令說:我們的任務是保護民眾在我們的國土,免於任何模式的攻擊,同時,必須能夠預測任何類型的攻擊,隨時會發生;
這類是不相關於歷史與文化!
因為沒有人很爽地檢查他們的創傷-在一個我們的漁民被殺案件;
一個被撕開,醜陋的歷史與文化!
所以,格殺令的作法是,意味著保護民眾安全的國家安全理解!
即使,在衝突的背景下,國家有權保留格殺令防衛的武裝殺害事件;
這類是不相關於歷史與文化!
簡單來說,格殺令防衛是台灣的國家主權的權利,以面對其他國家使用武力;
特別是,流氓國家;
這是降低流氓國家對台灣使用武力的權利!
這類是不相關於歷史與文化!
端視歷史經驗證明:全球各國有權利抗議與“非常憤怒”,同時,並要求道歉和賠償!
所以,格殺令是正當理由與必要性的自衛力量,有效地有權訴諸武力,以保護民眾安全!
最後是,格殺令是正當理由,也提供了一個適當的法律框架,以保護民眾與監督其運用!

重點是:馬總統真的了解格殺令的戰術定義嗎?
不!全然不!這類是不相關於歷史與文化!

 

文章標籤

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()