窮小子冷眼輯

蔡英文說想想：

伊拉克風雲(四)-美國與伊朗的軍事合作
 

風傳媒主題-請輸入標題?

http://www.stormmediagroup.com/opencms/review/detail/825a295c-f24c-11e3-b79d-ef2804cba5a1/?uuid=825a295c-f24c-11e3-b79d-ef2804cba5a1

IRAQI'S SITUATION(4):THE MILITARY COOPERATIONS BETWEEN THE US AND IRAN?
THINK AGAIN BY 蔡英文
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 JUNE 21 2014

According with the US's President's announcement that the US military advisers will be sent to Iraq to help counterattack the threat from a Sunni terror group.
The question is that : how the U.S. troops will cooperate with Iranian soldiers?What about war-fighting code?
Obviously,these historical stories had been for a long time,and the US's troops could not own the right of high priority,so that how to cooperate with each other?
While White House National Security Council and a Defense Department did explanation to lighten these puzzles.
Iran,Shiite-dominated army-forces have deployed in Iraq to help protect Baghdad's Shiite.(Information citing Iranian security officials).
In particular,the U.S. National Security Council and a Defense Department did not question the Iranian army-force existence there.
If there are Iranian military deployment in Iraq,that how the US troops faces it?
According with Secretary of State John Kerry explanation is opening to discussions with Iraq's security,Iranians participation.in particular,counterattack the existence of terrorist forces,and keep Iraq is the integrity of the country.
In other words,ask for Iran can play a constructive partnership-role,rather than as dominated army-forces supporting the Shiite-led government.Or it has also been clear about any possible interaction with Iran on the standard of Iraq.
Anyway,they will be based on long and wider history,the US's operation and Iran's involvement to help and support Iraq to counterattack the existence of terrorist forces.
they will be based on long and wider history,Iran has been involved with Iraqi rather than military deployment,and being reducing hurt the likelihood of the US.
In turn,we must be acknowledged that the mission this common adversary - with Iran both supporting the Iraqi government counterattack the existence of terrorist forces.
And this is different with age-old of history and culture.
In short,Beyond either avoiding completely potential threat with age-old of history and culture - we do have security to self-defense.

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 JUNE 21 2014

端視美國總統已經宣布，派遣，美軍顧問團將進駐伊拉克來協助反擊，遜尼派恐怖組織的威脅；

問題是美國特種部隊如何與伊朗軍隊合作?作戰序號是甚麼?

平心而論，這是很多年以前的歷史故事，美國的地面特種部隊不會擁有最高優先指揮權；

既是如此，那如何合作?

雖然，白宮國家安全委員會與國防部有說明來舒緩這類納悶?

伊朗什葉派主導的軍事部隊已經部署在伊拉克，以幫助保護巴格達什葉派
(資料引述來自伊朗安全局）

特別是，美國國家安全委員會和國防部，沒有質疑伊朗軍隊的存在；

如果伊朗在伊拉克有軍事部署，那美軍將如何面對它？

依據美國國務卿的說明：美國是開放的討論關於伊拉克的安全．伊朗參與

特別是，保持伊拉克是一個完整國家，與反擊恐怖勢力的存在！

換句話說，要求伊朗發揮建設性夥伴作用，而不是主導軍隊支持的什葉派政府；

或是明確規範伊朗對伊拉克的任何可能性相互作用！

無論如何，基於對廣泛的悠久歷史，美國操作與伊朗參與，提供和協助，伊拉克反擊恐怖勢力的存在；

基於對廣泛的悠久歷史，伊朗曾經參與幫助伊拉克，而不是軍事部署，降低美國被傷害的可能性；

另言之，我們必須理解的是共同的敵人是這次的任務，是美國和伊朗雙方，支持伊拉克政府反擊恐怖勢力的存在；

這與古老的歷史與文化是不同的！

總之，超越，或者完全避免古老的歷史與文化潛在性威脅-我們有安全性自我防衛！