蔡英文說想想:

如果日本贏得第二次世界大戰

japan  

IF JAPAN HAD WON SECOND WORLD WAR?

THINK AGAIN BY 蔡英文

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 AUG 25 2014

Indeed,the atomic bombs were not the only element in the Allies' victory.
Whatever happens the Allies remained operated the U.S. admiral Chester W. Nimitz deployment of "island hopping,"

in which would have gained victory.While they would have taken much longer time.
Just the same,the Asian country was the most ferocious region in WWII.
Notwithstanding a proportional lack of military resources in the Asian country.
But the Asian country responded to the United States in whatever they could spare in terms which it was a Joint operation with American troop,

and many of whom remembrances were still fierceness.For instance,the events at Pearl Harbor.
According with WWII, two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan's land - the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Although,remain questioned by today's some people,who condemns the Allies would have sacrificed something in the model of morals,but overlooked that the Allies decided to take such extreme actions that might ensure their victory.
In other words,if it not for the atomic bombs,Japan would have had an opportunity to win victory in WWII.
In fact,Japan did not need to be fighting widespread among the Pacific theater,after all,resources could have been avoided.
In other words,Japan spread the age-old of history and culture and far away themselves open to defeat.
So,if Japan won WWII, and it remains difficult to say how the geopolitical landscape would have changed,in spite of Germany still lost.
Today,Japan is still one of the global ant nation,and if they really won victory,Japan's geopolitical landscape will likely be even powerful.
Without the atomic bombs and the Pearl Harbor,that does not need the United.States.In turn,the Japanese in quite they knew.

10492080_759840354082857_7443313622809856880_n  

其實,原子彈不是盟軍勝利的唯一要素;

無論如何,盟軍還是運用美國海軍上將尼米茲的跳島部署來取得勝利;

雖然,他們採取長時間;

即使如此,第二次世界大戰最猛烈的區域還是亞洲國家;

儘管,亞洲國家缺乏成比例的軍事資源;

但是,亞洲國家對美國的回應,仍然竭盡所能;

這是一個與美軍聯合作戰,許多人的記憶仍然激烈;

舉例來說,珍珠港事件;

端視二戰期間,兩顆原子彈被投到日本的土地-廣島和長崎的毀滅;

雖然,仍然有人譴責,今天,盟軍犧牲道德模式,卻忽略,盟軍決定這類極端行動,可能確保勝利;

換句話說,如果不是原子彈,日本可能有贏得二戰勝利機會?

其實,日本並沒有必要戰鬥在廣泛的太平洋戰區;

畢竟,資源本來是可以避免的;

換句話說,失敗在日本散布古老的歷史與文化,遠離自己的開放;

所以,日本贏得二戰勝利,還是很難說有地緣政治格局將發生改變;

即便是德國還是輸;

今天,日本還是全球有主導地位的國家;

如果,真的勝利了,日本的地緣政治格局會更強;

如果,沒有原子彈與珍珠港,那就不需要美國,另言之,日本了解!

arrow
arrow
    文章標籤
    原子彈 珍珠港
    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()