第六艦隊  

北大西洋公約組織出擊-無能的歐盟

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 NOV 23 2014

 北約有機會,重出江湖,特別是,美國海軍第六艦隊!

端視烏克蘭的危機,歐盟的無能,缺乏一個可信賴的承諾;

這將很困難地完成一致性干預!

是以,北約,特別是美國海軍第六艦隊,

必須採取有抱負的使命來預防暴力極端主義與恐怖主義,嘗試聯合古老的歷史與文化去影響有影響力的決策者!

它們通常操作秘密行動來避免報復;

換句話說,這是不同於傳統戰爭,戰術核心是終結歷史!

作為危機說明,終結歷史涉及到預防,攻擊者嘗試顛覆一個正常運作的國家和分化的社會共識的努力;

毫無疑問,在當前無能的歐盟,

北約的挑戰是有效應對,不對稱性的危機與威脅,將需要加強與美國的合作!

為什麼北約比較好?

其實,北約的好是基於快速反應;

畢竟,應對不對稱的威脅,歷史與文化是不夠的!

歷史與文化不會是可信賴的承諾;或者是能夠完全依賴於作戰行動的依據!

是以北約應該考慮靈活的終結歷史的策略努力;預防潛在性敵人與能夠解決從多個角度的威脅!

其實,北約適合強化歐盟的危機處理;

因為它的作戰與歷史經驗能,夠提供多樣化的聯合作戰!

另言之,北約能夠建立一個有效的終結歷史的戰略合作夥伴;

一前一後地驅動歐盟的政治與軍事部署;

換句話說,烏克蘭危機提出了一個堅實的機會;

面對未來的共同威脅,進一步發展終結歷史的戰略合作夥伴!

畢竟,烏克蘭危機改變歐洲危機與威脅模式;

是以,北約應該利用終結歷史的優勢,避免重複浪費;

透過密切的防衛計劃來執行新歐洲整合!

終結歷史的優勢將提供一個很好的機會;

調整未來合作發展模式,是以不應該錯過這個機會!

終結歷史的安全優勢對歐洲的重要性

終結歷史的安全優勢代表作戰的最佳戰術部署!

因為不對稱的危機與威脅很困難地管理,一旦坐大,將可能製造不穩定緊張局勢;

舉例來說,烏克蘭危機將可能出現的結果是終結歷史,凍結衝突;

畢竟,歷史與文化意味著容易變成缺乏可預期的政治或軍事部署來解決衝突與叛亂;

容易出現不穩定的情勢,攻擊北約的安全應變能力!

終結歷史的安全優勢理念提供一個不可缺少的理念來解決叛亂的挑戰;

另言之,它將為了未來的危機與威脅作準備並提供繁榮,透明與發展;

特別是,針對顛覆性威脅的最佳戰術部署!

機會不容錯過

北約需要擴大它的策略部署作戰能力面對未來的危機與威脅的有效防衛;

並加強與美國的合作,而不是老歐洲的唬爛!

透過終結歷史的安全優勢,北約能夠集中力量來反擊破壞穩定的威脅;

所以,北約與歐盟不應該錯過機會來驅動新模式戰略合作夥伴;

大西洋區域在可預期的未來,北約和歐盟,不僅能避免不對稱的危機與威脅,

確保歐洲的穩定,安全與和平,而不是古老的歷史與文化!

150px-US_Sixth_Fleet_Logo_high_resolution_version

THE LAUNCH AN ATTACK OF THE NATO - THE INABILITY OF THE EU

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 NOV 23 2014

An opportubity for NATO comes out of retirement - United States Sixth Fleet,particularly.
According with the crisis of Ukraine ; the EU's inability where lacks of a credible commitment that it will be toughly agree on an intervention.
As NATO,especially the United States Sixth Fleet who must take on an ambitious mission to prevent violent extremism and terrorism which tries to impact influential decision makers by jointing age-old of history and culture.
They operate often clandestine mission to avoid retribution ; in other words,it is unlike to conventional war,so the tactical core is Ending of history.
In response to the crisis,Ending of history involve efforts prevented to adversary tries to destabilise a functioning country and polarize social consensus.
Undoubtedly, predominating in the EU's inability presents NATO with challenge is to effectively counter asymmetric crisis and threat that they need to strengthen cooperation with the United States.

Why the NATO is more better?

Indeed,the better of NATO is is based on a rapid response,after all,to counter asymmetric crisis and threat,history and culture are alone insufficient.
History and culture alone will not be credible commitment,or they can rely exclusively on accordance of war-fighting action.
As the NATO should consider a flexible strategy of Ending of history and strive to prevent potential adversaries,and will be able to tackle the threat from multiple angles.
Indeed,the NATO attempts best suited to the EU's crisis management,because its historical,and warfare experiences offers a diversity of Joint Operation.
In turn,the NATO can build an effective Ending of history as a strategic partner,which be tandem that the EU's political and military deploument.In other words,by Ukraine's crisis,which provides a solid opportunity to face the common threat of the future ; and develop Ending of history as a strategic partnership even further.
After all,Ukraine's crisis has changed the model of crisis and threat in Europe. So,as the NATO should take advantage of Ending of history superiority to avoid mirroring-waste,through close in defence planning to execute new integration of Europe.
The Ending of history superiority will provide a opportunity to adjust the future model of cooperation.As the NATO should not miss the opportunities.

The importance of the Ending of history security superiority for the Europe

The Ending of history security superiority represents the best tactical deployment of warfare.
Because an asymmetric crisis and threat are more difficult to manage once they are on top,that they will become destabilisation tensional.
For instance,as Ukraine crisis.the consequence will be Ending of history,frozen conflict.After all,history and culture signify that they will easily evolve into conflict and an insurgency with lacking of predictable political or military deployment ; and show vulnerable to destabilisation tensional can attack the NATO's security adaptability.
The concept of Ending of history security superiority offers an indispensable idea to tackle the challenges of an insurgency.
In turn,it will be better pave crisis and threat way for the future,and provide prosperity,transparency and development.In particular,it will be aimed at the subversive threats in the best tactical deployment.

An opportunity not to be sacrificed

The NATO needs to expand its strategic deployed war-fighting capability to effectively confront crisis and threat in for the future,and strengthen its cooperation with the United States,rather than "BIG WORDS" of the age-old of Eruope.
By embracing of Ending of history security superiority ,NATO can focus their force to counterattack destabilising threats.
So,the NATO and the EU should not miss out on an opportunity to push their new model of cooperation with strategic partners.
NATO and the EU could not only avoid an asymmetric crisis and threat,and ensure the Eruopes' stability,security and peace in the Euro-Atlantic region for the predictable future rather than the age-old of history and culture.

 

 

    文章標籤

    NATO

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()