POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 NOV 23 2014
THE LAUNCH AN ATTACK OF THE NATO - THE INABILITY OF THE EU
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 NOV 23 2014
An opportubity for NATO comes out of retirement - United States Sixth Fleet,particularly.
According with the crisis of Ukraine ; the EU's inability where lacks of a credible commitment that it will be toughly agree on an intervention.
As NATO,especially the United States Sixth Fleet who must take on an ambitious mission to prevent violent extremism and terrorism which tries to impact influential decision makers by jointing age-old of history and culture.
They operate often clandestine mission to avoid retribution ; in other words,it is unlike to conventional war,so the tactical core is Ending of history.
In response to the crisis,Ending of history involve efforts prevented to adversary tries to destabilise a functioning country and polarize social consensus.
Undoubtedly, predominating in the EU's inability presents NATO with challenge is to effectively counter asymmetric crisis and threat that they need to strengthen cooperation with the United States.
Why the NATO is more better?
Indeed,the better of NATO is is based on a rapid response,after all,to counter asymmetric crisis and threat,history and culture are alone insufficient.
History and culture alone will not be credible commitment,or they can rely exclusively on accordance of war-fighting action.
As the NATO should consider a flexible strategy of Ending of history and strive to prevent potential adversaries,and will be able to tackle the threat from multiple angles.
Indeed,the NATO attempts best suited to the EU's crisis management,because its historical,and warfare experiences offers a diversity of Joint Operation.
In turn,the NATO can build an effective Ending of history as a strategic partner,which be tandem that the EU's political and military deploument.In other words,by Ukraine's crisis,which provides a solid opportunity to face the common threat of the future ; and develop Ending of history as a strategic partnership even further.
After all,Ukraine's crisis has changed the model of crisis and threat in Europe. So,as the NATO should take advantage of Ending of history superiority to avoid mirroring-waste,through close in defence planning to execute new integration of Europe.
The Ending of history superiority will provide a opportunity to adjust the future model of cooperation.As the NATO should not miss the opportunities.
The importance of the Ending of history security superiority for the Europe
The Ending of history security superiority represents the best tactical deployment of warfare.
Because an asymmetric crisis and threat are more difficult to manage once they are on top,that they will become destabilisation tensional.
For instance,as Ukraine crisis.the consequence will be Ending of history,frozen conflict.After all,history and culture signify that they will easily evolve into conflict and an insurgency with lacking of predictable political or military deployment ; and show vulnerable to destabilisation tensional can attack the NATO's security adaptability.
The concept of Ending of history security superiority offers an indispensable idea to tackle the challenges of an insurgency.
In turn,it will be better pave crisis and threat way for the future,and provide prosperity,transparency and development.In particular,it will be aimed at the subversive threats in the best tactical deployment.
An opportunity not to be sacrificed
The NATO needs to expand its strategic deployed war-fighting capability to effectively confront crisis and threat in for the future,and strengthen its cooperation with the United States,rather than "BIG WORDS" of the age-old of Eruope.
By embracing of Ending of history security superiority ,NATO can focus their force to counterattack destabilising threats.
So,the NATO and the EU should not miss out on an opportunity to push their new model of cooperation with strategic partners.
NATO and the EU could not only avoid an asymmetric crisis and threat,and ensure the Eruopes' stability,security and peace in the Euro-Atlantic region for the predictable future rather than the age-old of history and culture.