map 3  

亞洲地中海的歷史禁臠 (一)

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子

中國歷史限制南中國海

端視中華人民共和國強調,南中國海擁有無可爭辯的海洋主權;

特別是,九段虛線內相關水域島嶼與海底的主權權利和管轄權;

至此,南中國海一直受到全球社會廣為關注!

重點是九段虛線內水域與島嶼;

格外是,印尼,越南與菲律賓強力反對,與主張:

現在,中華人民共和國並沒有九段虛線的地圖!

換句話說,在中華人民共和國要求是依據歷史和支持中國在南中國海相關的海洋主權與管轄權;

特別是,中國政府還沒有立法與宣布相關的法律依據!

因此,九段虛線的爭議被歷史所限制,也不相關於全球海洋法!

九段虛線的歷史故事其實,歷史性故事是不相關於海洋所有權;

換句話說,海洋所有權並不適用於所謂的歷史性故事;

或是存在於歷史性故事的責任,特別是,國家必須證明!

是以,九段虛線可能僅是說明水域,水下的配置,並不包括,專屬經濟區,大陸棚,或公海;

是以,中華人民共和國的九段虛線的要求可能是土地權利海域宣示!

關於土地權利,中華人民共和國的立場是明確的;

2009年,已經宣稱中國對南中國海擁有無可爭辯的主權-歷史故事!

因此,很明顯地,中華人民共和國的立場是,打算以歷史故事來說明九段虛線在它聲稱主權的水域與島嶼!

所以,事實上,中華人民共和國的立場還不是很清楚;

因此,本報告將分析九段虛線的可能解釋;特別是依照中華人民共和國的官方聲明!

political map    

(1),THE TABOOED TERRITORY OF THE ASIA'S MEDITERRANEAN SEA

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子

THE SOUTH CHINA SEA IS BEING LIMITED BY CHINESE HISTORY。

According with the P.R.C. has insisted on indisputable maritime sovereignty in the South China Sea,

in particular,sovereign rights and jurisdiction over the relevant waters,islands and under water in the nine line dashes.

So far,the South China Sea is still widely concerned by global society.

The point is that waters and islands are in the nine line dashes.

Especially,Indonesia,Vietnam,and Philippine have opposed strongly,and including by asserting,now,the P.R.C. did not have map of the nine line dashes.

In other words,the P.R.C's claim is in accordance with history,and supports China's maritime sovereignty and related rights and jurisdiction in the South China Sea,

in particularly,China's government has not explained through legislation,and claim associated with the las basis.

Accordingly,the disputations of the nine line dashes are limited by history,and not related to the international law of the maritime.

HISTORICAL STORY OF THE NINE LINE DASHES

Indeed,historcial stories are not related to the maritain of ownership.

In other words,the maritain of ownership do not apply to so-called historcial story.

Or,the existence of historic story is on the responsibility.

In particular,Country must demonstrate.

As the nine line dashes may only show the deployments of the waters,under the the sea,not including EEZ, continental shelf, or international waters.

As the nine line dashes demands of the P.R.C. may be rights to ground amd announces to water.

With value to ground rights,the P.R.C. position is clear ;

it has asserted that China has indisputable sovereignty over the islands in the South China Sea in 2009 - the historical story.

Thus, it is apparent that the P.R.C. position is to intend its historical story to show the the nine line dashes the water and islands over which it claims sovereignty.

So,in fact,the P.R.C. position is not clear,therefore, this report will analyze possible interpretations of the nine line dashes,

especially,in accordance with the official statements of the People’s Republic of China.

 

continuously

 

    文章標籤

    亞洲地中海 南中國海

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()