iransnipers6  

CONSIDER AFTER PARADE

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 JUN 17 2015

法國左派雜誌是錯誤的攻擊,不論你是誰,或只是一個普通的民眾,什麼是積極的戰術回應?
其實,透過歷史與文化的組成,沒有知覺的死亡是很容易,但它不是特別有深刻印象!
因為我們已經看到全球各國都無意幫助暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義;
真正重要的是,我們應該如何面對歷史與文化的危險性!
例如,可以肯定,這是讓人滿意的支持,自由表達的原則與防衛歷史與文化的恐怖;
同樣地,全球各國的政治和宗教領袖讓人滿意地譴責阿拉伯和伊斯蘭世界的攻擊!
畢竟,一個不斷成長與狡猾的歷史與文化存在,威脅我們的未來,與我們的民眾安全!
一個讓人震驚的恐怖攻擊案件,我們不需要反抗的情緒,或僅是相對應的反應!
因此,我們沉著想想:為什麼它發生了,什麼才是最有效的反應?
如果,我們真的被煽動,還是歷史與文化決定我們的想想;
我們很可能會失誤,並讓狡猾的歷史與文化發現新的支持者!
因為狡猾的歷史與文化是虛假的,將讓問題變得更差,而不是更好!
其實,兇手僅是尋求實現一類對西方國家的的戰爭,讓他們一個簡單的願望是成為最堅定的防衛者,另言之,他們是英雄,而不是兇手!
舉例來說,美國因應911恐怖攻擊,前總統布希僅是鎖定al Qaeda與瓦解伊拉克海珊政權;
所以,這個戰術邏輯是,我們需要的是保持歷史與文化的恐怖威脅視域!
這顯然是一個問題,特別是跑向伊斯蘭國家的人群,這對於實際的反恐仍然是適當;
個人看法是不要忽略巴黎恐怖攻擊案件;
另言之,左派歷史與文化總是唬爛恐怖主義的威脅,甚至,忽視它!
因為面對當前的狀況,左派歷史與文化唬爛恐怖主義的恐懼症與反宗教,反穆斯林,這將無可避免地鼓勵許多人擁抱聖戰!
依據歷史經驗,它將讓全球各國政府浪費錢與資源,反擊恐怖行動;
另言之,左派歷史與文化的陽謀!
舉例來說,中國,不要臉的歷史與文化,透過反恐,從事非法監視與迫害;
進而威脅到整個東亞的地緣政治利益!
過度的恐懼,導致美國浪費錢,也因而威脅到美國的國家核心利益!
現在,左派歷史與文化的陽謀,透過恐怖主義的恐懼將讓歐洲的未來安全納悶;
平心而論,我不了解為什麼唬爛的歷史與文化是如此不要臉!
甚至,當反擊案件,也是很緩慢,其效果也是有限的;
但是,民眾相信唬爛的歷史與文化是很容易,比恐怖攻擊的殺傷力,真的是厲害;
因此,左派歷史與文化唬爛恐怖主義的危險性,為了嚇唬民眾,讓恐怖主義激怒民眾,那恐怖主義仍然是威脅!
這就是中國的反恐笑話;
因為中國不是專注於恐怖主義是什麼,而是他們的注意力集中在左派歷史與文化!
我懷疑左派歷史與文化唬爛威脅論,而不是真實的恐怖與極端主義;
畢竟,當恐怖攻擊案件發生,左派歷史與文化不能迅速反應與尋求預防作戰行動;
舉例來說,美國記得911歷史教訓,但至少它是關鍵來啟發美國與夥伴的深刻的敵意來面對各種各樣的恐怖主義根源!
特別是當,左派歷史與文化執政權在手,就會對美國視而不見;
所以,有鑑於這類歷史與文化,事實上,更引人注意的是暴力歷史與文化!
反恐,也不意味是錯誤的,但這是防衛國家核心利益所採取的行動;
換句話說,成功的關鍵不是左派歷史與文化言論,而是重整國家軍事策略部署來干預左派歷史與文化!
最關鍵的是沈著的決心與終結歷史的意識努力;
當悲劇發生時,左派歷史與文化不能改變我們的自由模式;
除非,我們允許左派歷史與文化這樣做!
這意味我們是有自由的終結歷史來決定如何面對它們帶來的威脅與危機;
總之,如果我們允許左派歷史與文化,他們將會嚇唬我們做一些糟糕的行動;
那我們將會是笨蛋;
或者,更糟糕的是,我們必須放棄獨立與自由!

10930153_10153076727278189_712332295990325602_n    

前進,在思考過後

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子JUN 17 2015

The French Left wing's newspaper were the wrong response to attack ; whatever who you are,or just a common people,what is the most beneficial tactic to react.
Indeed,being composed by through history and culture by unconscious deaths is easy,but it is not especially impressive.
Because we have seen rest of world are insignificantly helping historical and cultural violence extremism and terrorism,and what really principals are how we facing the danger of history and culture.
For example,to be sure,it is satisfying of support for the principle of free expression,and defenses of terroristic history and culture.
Similarly,it is encouraging to see attacks condemned of the Arab and Islamic worlds by political and religious leaders rest of world.
After all,such now a glowing and crafty history and culture,and existential threat to our future and our peoples' security.
A astonishing terroristic-attack case,we do not need expressions of resistance,or just reactions will be.
Thus,we are to consider steadily,why it has happened, and what the most effective responses will be?
If we let provoke,or history and culture order our consideration,we are likely to make mistakes,and make crafty history and culture easier for them to find new supports.
Because of crafty history and culture are falses.and these will will make problem stupidest instead of better.
Indeed,murderers only sought to achieve a war on Western Countries,which make them who's a simple wish to become steadfast defenders.In turn,they look like heroes instead of criminals.
For instance,the U.S. response to the 9/11 terroristic-attacks,and the former president George W. Bush was only locking on al Qaeda,and broken down Saddam Hussein's administration,Iraq.So,this tactical logic is that we need to keep the terrorist threat in aspects of history and culture.
Apparently,it is a problem,particularly,given people running to the Islamic Stat,and this real counterterrorism remains appropriate.
An individual viewpoint is not ignore the Paris terror-attack case,in turn,the left wing's history and culture have been overstating the threat of history and culture,even just overlooking it.
Since we face the current situation,the left wing's history and culture have been overstating the terrorism-phobia, anti-religion,and anti-Muslim that this will inevitably encourage many people to hold the jihadi.
In accordance with historical experience,it will make global governments to waste money and resources to counterattack counterterrorist activities.In turn,it is premeditated plot of the left wing's history and culture.
For instance,China,shameful history and culture through counter-terrorism to engage illegal surveillance and persecutions,thereby threatening the whole East Asia's regional politics interests.
Exaggerated fears would led the United States to waste money,consequently,threatening the National core interests of the the United States.
Now,the left wing's history and culture through fears of terrorism that make the future of the Europe's security in doubt.
To be honest,I do not realize why "BIG WORDS" of history and culture like that shamefulness is.
Even when counterattacking cases are so slowly and effects are limited, too,but people believe "BIG WORDS" of history and culture are more likely easiler and more deadly than terror-attack really violent are.
Thus,the left wing's history and culture will exaggerate the danger of terrorism in order to frighten people and to keep terrorism provoked people,that terrorism itself remains a threat.
This ridiculous counterterrorism for China.Because China not focus on what the terrorism ,than they focus on the left wing's history and culture.
I suspect the left wing's history and culture exaggerate these threats,rather than real terrorism and extremism.
After all,whenever terror-attack cases happen,the left wing's history and culture were not repidly to respond thm,and sought to do preventive war-fighting action.
For example,the United States has remembered the historical lesson of 911,but it is at least critical to being inspired by a deep hostility toward the United States with partners,who face various resources of terrorism.
Especially,the regimes govern with the left wing's history and culture hand, than they conveniently turn a blind eye to the United States.
So,given these history and culture,indeed,what is more remarkable is that violence of history and culture.
At this point, what violence of history and culture are to be done?
Nor does counterterrorism mean that it is wrong,but these actions taken to defend National core interests.
In other words,the criticals to success are not the left wing's history and culture speeches,but than re-integrated National military deployment to interventions throughout the left wing's history and culture.
The key is steady determination,and conscious efforts of Ending of history ; whenever tragedies will happen the left wing's history and culture cannot change our model of freedom unless we allow the left wing's history and culture to do so.
This mean we have the free of Ending of history to decide how to face to the threat and crises they bring.
In short,if we allow the left wing's history and culture,and they will frighten us into doing something stupid action,that we will be idiots,or into we must be giving up independence and freedom.

    文章標籤

    前進

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()