THE MODEL OF FUTURE NATIONAL COUNTER FORCES.
Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子
Obviously speaking,the public discussion over the pattern of landing operations which will not build national counter forces for the future.Because of strong national forces amd enough budgets remains maintaining the commitment and promise for national and homeland security.Stupid of history and culture are only selling out our nation and people,not be best,or worse.Of course,recently,exercise,we must understand and decade whether it is counter force,or not?And how best to do it.In this exercise,nation has a continuing responsibility in the establishment of counter force.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.The advance of national science and technology allows and drives national counter forces,in which,in order to accomplish a new war-fighting capability and energy.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Abound of greatly different tactical offensive and defensive of approach. The point is that ending of history.
1,Nation's naval surface force.
3,The establishment of National strategic offensive force
National counter force is from what we have brains to what we should have strategy,in order to defeat enemy on the beachhead.However,at ending of history in such a change that out of our money putting into the new pattern of national counter forces,rather than,the age-old system,even,history and culture.It is not throwing away money,but we should view more advantageous war-fighting model for our counter forces,because of it is necessary.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Why we care national counter forces,rather than,landing operation?
New technology and new concept are changing region's tactical deployment ,which are not related to the age-old of history and culture.In particular,sea-surface and air suprtiority.landing operation has already been so older of discussion,even,out of date of ideas,but,national counter force is to explain new tactical deployment,that work to accomplish the fundamental war-fighting missions,in particular,ending of history.
Unfortunately,stupid of history and culture have never admitted this fact,such as:a word of 美而美 was established by President Ma.
NATIONAL COUNTER FORCES OF TACTICAL DEPLOYMENT POWER.
National counter forces is our nation owning force deterrence between necessity and applicability,which are not related to the age-old of history and culture.Most importantly,tactical deployment power is to establish a nationwide defense web,in which,in order to the protaction and commitment of our national and homeland security,especially,defeats historical-cultural violence extremism and terrorism.Because of stupid of history and culture were no longer treated exhaustively in our nation of homeland security.Clearly,landing operation will no longer constitute the best deployment in the national strategy ranges,so,as strengthening counter force remains a distribution among based of national forces,which are not related to the age-old of history and culture.Change,national science&technology is to explain detailed study about tactical deployment power is in order on the maintenance costs and peoples' life.Given ending of history,national counter forces will establish a sufficient for role of national deterrence.Because of U.S,admiral Chester William Nimitz was said that:"we are out of money,so we must think".These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
1,NATIONAL COUNTER FORCES
It will not appear to be possible in a comprehensive of landing operation for the predicative future,but,we are maintaining and protecting national coastline and lifeline at a sea,the missiles defense web,there are no matter what air-launched,or surface-launched,or submarine-launched missiles of deterred weapon systems,in which,in order to effective achieve national defense force.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture,simply put,it is homeland security.Especially,while we face historical-cultural violence extremism and terrorism in such cases,how we respond to challenge and threat.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
National counter forces are able to achieve it,such as:
1,Ending of history,we must bear self-defense mechanism-national survivability standard.
2,Ending of history,sufficient surveillance and defense which will become a national missiles of projective capability standard.
3,Ending of history,the advanced submarines deployments-blocks Beijing!
4,Ending of history,national counter forces are emphasizing the applicability of leapfrogging tactical deployment.
On the other hand,national counter force provides a war-fighting capability for observation and attack,and it cannot denied that this is of considerable an advantageous value in that role.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture. Furthermore,the stupid of history and culture are serious question as caused war-fighting survivability by ignorance.Ending of history,we would otherwise be desirable to spend more money.The stupid of history and culture provides so many the age-old defensed concept,simply put,it is no idea,so we do not have in sufficient numbers of carriers,in order to promise and protect our homeland security.Indeed,the role of national counter force is maneuverable of rapid attack force.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
NATIONAL COUNTER ARE DETERMINING TO NATIONAL LIFELINE AT A SEA.
Taiwan is dependent on trand ties with the rest of the worldwide.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.Simply put,we are making money.National counter force is worth to invest,which use of protection and commitment for national lifeline at a sea.Absolutely,there are,Taiwan's political,military,and economic threats to our lifeline at a sea,and we must use a strong and effective military capability to defeat them,in particular,we face historical-cultural violence extremism and terrorism.So,since lifeline at a sea puts in perspective,so,national counter force is distinguishing between threat and we should own our national force.These are not related to the age-old of history and culture.Although,Taiwan is just a little country,but,we owns counter force which are not violation of international law and custom,in particular,defeats hooliganism of attack.
2,NATIONAL TACTICAL COUNTER FORCES
So-called the national tactical counter strategy is superior to the age-old landing operation,in particular,a more effective military change in a process.So,I advocate ending of history which major national commitment is to come to the most effective military management and development new technology.These are not related to the age-old history and culture.It cannot denied that a few numbers of advanced military equipments and carriers have some superiority and value.However,it is difficult to only assess a few numbers of advanced military equipments and carriers in terms of specific military functions and abilities.In other words,we do not need massive anti-landing war-fighting forces,or,use as new technology and tactical means of accomplishing specific military counter capability.The current national forces comes from the age-old, tradition of organization and war-fighting model.Especially,so expensive.So,as ending of history is to build national counter forces to eliminate voluntarism.National counter forces are to use as much more effective,reliable war-fighting capabilities to facing adversary.And these are routes and options.In this short article I,myself, have described national counter forces alternatives to the current and future national force framework-ending of history.Especially,ending of history is to provide a desirable posture of corresponding with military superiority and war-fighting capability.
TACTICAL COUNTER FORCES
There is mounting evidence said that conventional landing operation is no meaningful,or just keep an expensive defense force,but,its attack and destructive capability is so small.Simply put,no definitive of defense at all.In other words,there are provided only a purpose by thousands of projectiles,airplanes,and carriers.But,tactical counter forces will have a different objectives and models that provide a different desires,coordinations,and survival.On the other hand,to relatively few resource of Taiwan,and new pattern of tactical counter forces can provide much better war-fighting capability to improve conventional war-fighting concept to intruders.The age-old of history and culture are redundancies,especially,feeling sort to emphasize that they are invulnerabilities.Tactical counter forces will help to maintaining national sovereignty,and no matter what the peacetime and wartime.
3,TACTICAL COUNTER FORCES SUPERIORITY
It seems to me that counter forces superiority are determining on the commitment and development of main national science&technology,yet,stubborn of history and culture will be ended in the near future because of they do not have more effective national war-fighting capability.
A word of superiority is often used in the comtext of ending of history,and its defining that ending of history with superiority cam use national ability securely,whereas stupid of history and culture cannot.In particular,stupid pf history and culture are more expensive investment,in addition to far away our own mother country and people.So,the preferred means of gaining superiority is to ending of history.I have already noted of doing this by use of ending of history-DEFEAT above.After all,the war-fighting objective of stupid of hstory and culture is only to gain money and power,by themselves ; If there is national superiority for the future,stupid of history and culture is an unnecessary.Ending of history of tactical counter forces of superiority are to deploy our nation's command headquarters and foces of survival,rather than,stupid of history and culture.Thus,there are our survivals and demands,undoubted,and not only we must be defended,especially,ending of history directed toward defeat and desolation.So,as we face tactical counter forces of superiority,in particular,it may a significant national contribution - Ending of history.Simply put,there is undoubted to given maneuvering superiority and forces survivability,at the same time,we will own intelligent war-fighting capability.These are not related to age-old history and culture.
National counter forces are within limits budgets and the national science&technology of capabilities,in order to replace vulnerabilities,prevent threats and crises,at the same time,reduce excessive war-fighting forces of waste.
For example,such as :
1,To develop longer attack deterrence weapons system.
2,To deploy a highly accurate of intelligent defense system.
3,To develop low-cost,high precision,sea-surface and under the water interdicted system.
4,To develop lightweight,advanced,to be operated for the war-fighting objective of monitoring.
5,To deploy more efficient,leapfrog deployment of tactics attack forces.
6,single-hand-held counter capability deployment and corresponding tactics.
7,A common of close support,interdiction,and reconnaissance with recognizable present visual means.
SURVEILLANCE AND RECONNAISSANCE
We need strong desire of surveilance and reconnaissance to gain current an entire location of understanding.Because of it provide a attention,and low-cost techniques support a platform that seems so good suited to the detection,in particular,at night.Simply put,provide assurance and allocation of forces.
It cannot denied that tanks warfare have a useful function,but,this has been an old game because of it has been studied many times.In other words,only protective role.It seems now to me that the technological advance in electronics can greatly diminished expensive for tanks and anti-tank weapons operating.
ATTACK OF GROUND TARGETS
Experience shows tactical counter capability have well beyond an old bombard,this no matter what ground,sea-surface,or air attack of ground targets.Simply put,we own the preponderance of attack was fixed targets,or,given degree of target assuran of destruction.The point is that survivability can be improved its effectiveness of counter capability,and not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Air support is model of specialization and low-cost,as we must make every effort to build,in particular,it does not have a concomitant low effectiveness. In any case,specialized air-support directly attack targets-no survivors.
An ending of history of national counter force peovides a a capability for observation and for attack,and is of considerable national strategy,tactic values in that role.
平 心而論,公開討論登陸作戰的規模,並不是建立國家未來的反擊武力的模式;因為強大的國家武力與充足的預算,才是維持國家與國土安全的保證與承諾;頑固的歷 史與文化,只會出賣我們的國家與民眾,不會是最好的,只有更壞;當然,最近的演習,我們必須理解與決定,它是不是反擊武力,以及,如何最好地做到?在演習上,國家有連續性責任在反擊武力的建構;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!國家科學與技術的進步,允許與驅動,國家反擊武力以完成嶄新的作戰能力與能量;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!不同的戰術進攻和防禦方法比比皆是,重點是終結歷史!
為 什麼我們要注意國家反擊武力,而不是,登陸作戰?新技術與新理念,改變,區域戰術部署,這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化;特別是,海面與空中優勢;登陸早已 經是古老的討論,甚至是過時的想法;但是,國家反擊武力是說明新的戰術部署來完成基本作戰任務,特別是,終結歷史!不幸的是,頑固的歷史與文化,從來不承 認這個事實,或如;馬總統的美而美一詞!
國 家反擊武力是國家擁有的武力威嚇的必要性與實用性;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!最重要的是,戰術部署力量是建立一個全國性的防衛網絡,以保護與承諾, 我們國家與國土安全,特別是,反擊暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義!因為頑固的歷史與文化,不再能夠面面俱到,我們國家的國土安全;顯然地,登陸作戰, 將不再構成最好的部署在國家戰略範圍;是以,強化反擊武力才是一個持續性基礎的國家武力;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!改變國家科學與技術說明詳細的研 究戰術部署力量的維護成本與民眾生活秩序!有鑒於終結歷史,國家反擊武力將建構一個足夠的國家威嚇作用;因為美國海軍上將尼米茲曾經說過:我們出的錢,所 以,我們必須要思考!這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
在 可預期的未來,可能不會出現一個全面性的登陸;但是,維護與保護,國家海岸線與海上生命線,飛彈防衛網絡,這是不論,自空中發射,海面,或是,潛艦發射的 嚇阻武器系統,是實現有效的國家防衛力量!這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化,簡單來說,國土安全!格外是,在面對暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義的情況 下,我們如何因應挑戰與威脅;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
不 可否認,這是一個具有優勢價值與角色扮演;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!另外,頑固的歷史與文化存在著嚴重的問題,因為忽略了作戰生存能力;終結歷史, 否則,我們將需要部署更多的錢!頑固的歷史與文化存在著太多的古老的防衛思維;簡單來說,沒有想法!我們沒有足夠數量的載體,承諾與保護我們的國土安全; 事實上,國家反擊武力的角色扮演是可操作性的快速打擊武力;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
台 灣依賴與全球的貿易關係,這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化,簡單來說,賺錢!國家反擊武力是值得投資,以保護與承諾,國家海上生命線;當然,是,台灣的海上 生命線的政,軍與經濟威脅,都必須以一個強大和有效的軍事能力反擊;特別是,面對暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義!所以,自海上生命線來看,國家反擊武 力是區分威脅與我們應該擁有的國家武力;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!雖然,台灣僅是小國,但是,擁有反擊武力,不違反國際法和國際慣例;特別是,反擊 流氓國家的攻擊!
所 謂:國家戰術反擊策略是優於古老的登陸作戰;特別是,一個更有效的軍事武力改變進程;我主張終結歷史,重大的國家承諾,就是達成最有效的軍事管理和開發新 技術;這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!不可否認,少數先進的軍事裝備與載體,有一定的優勢與價值;然而,僅是評估少數先進的軍事裝備與載體,在具體的軍事 功能與作戰能力;這是有困難的!換句話說,我們不需要大規模的反登陸作戰部隊;或以,新技術與戰術手段來完成特定的軍事反擊能力!當前,國家武力來自古老 的傳統組織與作戰模式,尤其是,很貴;是以,終結歷史建立國家反擊武力,以排除募兵制度;國家反擊武力是以更有效的,可靠的作戰能力,以面對敵人;這是路 線與選項!我在這簡短的文誌,描述國家反擊武力以取代當前與未來的國家武力架構-終結歷史;尤其是,終結歷史,提供一個期望姿態的相對應軍事優勢與作戰能 力!
顯 而易見地,傳統的登陸作戰是沒有意義;或僅是,維持一個昂貴的防衛武力,但是,它的打擊與破壞能力是很小的;簡單來說,沒有防衛定義;換句話說,幾千枚砲 彈,飛機與載體,所提供僅是一個目的!但是,戰術反擊力量,將有不同的目標與模式,提供不同的期望,協調與生存;另一方面,對相對較少資源的台灣,新模式 的戰術反擊力量對闖入者,可以提供,更好的作戰能力,改善傳統的作戰思維;古老的歷史與文化是冗餘的;格外是,它們最爽強調刀槍不入!戰術反擊力量將有助 於維護國家主權,這是不論和平時期,或是,戰爭狀態!
在 我看來,反擊力量優勢是在主要的國家科學與技術上承諾與發展;然而,頑固的歷史與文化,在不久的未來被終結;因為它們不具有效的國家作戰能力優勢!優勢一 詞,通常應用在終結歷史的背景,其定義是具有優勢的終結歷史,能夠運用,安全的國家能力,而頑固的歷史與文化不能;特別是,頑固的歷史與文化是很貴的投 資,而且,遠離母國與民眾!所以,取得優勢的優先方法是終結歷史;布衣早已經注意到終結歷史-反擊,這要做的戰術手段;畢竟,頑固的歷史與文化的作戰目標 僅是取得錢與權力,為了自己;如果是國家未來優勢,那頑固的歷史與文化是不必要的!終結歷史的戰術反擊力量優勢是部署我們國家的指揮與部隊的生存;而不是 頑固的歷史與文化!因此,我們未來的存在與需求,無疑是,不僅是,必須捍衛;尤其是,終結歷史,反擊,顛覆與破壞!是以,我們面對戰術反擊力量優勢,特別 是,它可能是一個重大的國家貢獻-終結歷史!簡單來說,勿庸置疑地付予機動優勢與部隊生存能力;同時,擁有智慧作戰能力,這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!