窮小子冷眼輯

【蔡英文戰術分析】:【九二共識】/

【如果沒有臭酸，那送上山頭】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 AUG 9 2015 

The surrounding Taiwan's 92 - consensus is only surrounding Taiwan’s status as a nation is in a historical ridicule.
Although , China pledges moderation in dealing with territorial disputes and adopts U.S. the East-Asia regional domination in exchange for Taiwan.
As argument of 92 - consensus is able to have three tactical analysis:
First, it assumes that the 92 - consensus as a destruction to U.S.-Taiwan relations.
Second, it assumes that Taiwan can become as a high quality of the Air-carrer - lock the Japan , and stop the United States.
Eventually , I make the assumption that we must be cooperation with China on the regional politics and security issues.
Unfortunately, these assumptions are apparently "BIG WORDS" of history and culture.
Since history and culture are just a myth that it becomes clear that the 92 - consensus will not only spell the sensitive "CHINA'S DREAM" , in particular , it will threaten the stability of the Taiwan , including the East Asia.
1，The United States is a stumbling block - the pretty China - Taiwan relations.
2，Whose supports China,their are saying "BIG WORDS" that the unresolved question of Taiwanese independence , in particular , they have destroyed U.S.-Taiwan partnership.
As testing this assertion, it is important to consider the reality of Ending of the 92 - consensus.
Indeed , the issue of Taiwanese independence showed in the 1990s ; put simply , a National transformation to freedom , democracy , and independence , rather than statements of history and culture.
Still, even these issues no longer obstruct U.S.-China relations , with the Taiwan.
For instance , as the pro-independence Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) , and then-President Chen Shui-bian run into the 2005 passage of the Anti-Succession Law in China ; in turn , it is just a game with Left - wing of violent history and culture.
But , former President George W. Bush clarified the U.S. position : Taiwan cannot provoke China, but the United States would help defend Taiwan if China were to lose its patience with Taiwan and use force to achieve unification with the island.
This statement showed that the United States did not support either formal Taiwanese independence.This policy position effectively stabilized the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.
So , Left - wing of violent history and culture have also been processing to destroy security , stability , and balance between China and Taiwan.
In fact , there have made a relatively stable economic and political equilibrium between China and Taiwan , since President Ma started a stable economic and cooperative era.

THE MYTH OF THE－92 CONSENSUS
China will attack the Taiwan

From China’s point of view , its age-old of "perseverance"-claim over Taiwan is indisputable.
The effectiveness of a "perseverance"-claim is predicated on whether or not the other fears losing control of that history and culture.
In addition, the Taiwanese favor o the status quo of the freedom and independence , rather than , history and culture.
Meanwhile, the threat of Chinese military force acts to dissuade Taiwan from history and culture attempting to break away from the mainland , since Taiwan is able to gawk across the strait.
All in all, the history and culture of Taiwan as a "claim" fails to take into China’s influence , and complicates the possibility of negotiations.

THE MYTH OF THE 92 CONSENSUS
A auction sale of history and culture

While a U.S.-China are buryed the hatchet as a fundemental strategic deployment that ensure crucial U.S. interests, one must assess the re-actions of the United States.
In particular , the historical trend is still a key change China in U.S.-China relations.
Especially , history and culture lack of commitment to to accept U.S. ,just in get for control of Taiwan.

FREEDOM AND INDEPENDENCE ARE NO PANACEA

The concept of "ENDING OF HISTORY" (THE PARTNERSHOP) provides a creative strategy to resolve history and culture violence extremism and terrorism.
The Taiwan problem is unlikely solved in one fell swoop ; the free and independent status quo already acts as a foundation platform for future China-Taiwan relations ; and we should remain in place.
As Taiwan’s March 2016 presidential election , and the concept of the 92 - consensus appears particularly not so good.
Put simply , the current Taiwan problem is not so bad , and there is no need to counterattack history and culture violence extremism and terrorism.
In the end , the 92 - consensus is security and stability of the National consensus ; and we are counterattacking history and culture violence extremism and terrorism.

【Tsai Ing-wen's tactical analysis】

【92 - CONSENSUS】【IF IT IS STINKUNG , THAT SEND TO TOMB】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子　AUG 9 2015

圍繞台灣的九二共識，僅是一個台灣地位，一個國家爭議的歷史笑話；

雖然，中國誓言發誓溫和處理領土爭議，並承認美國在東亞區域主導權來交換台灣；

是以，九二共識的說法，能夠有三個戰術分析：

首先，設定九二共識，作為一個摧毀台灣與美國關係；

其次，設想台灣，可以作為一個優質的航空母艦，封鎖日本，阻擋美國；

最後，設想地緣政治與安全議題，必須與中國合作；

不幸地是，這類假設都顯然是歷史與文化的唬爛！

因為歷史與文化僅是一類神話，可以清楚地看到九二共識，不僅會拼出一個敏感的中國夢；

特別是，威脅到台灣安全環境穩定，包括，東亞！

神話的九二共識：

一，美國是一個絆腳石，中國-台灣關係是美麗的；

二，哪個擁護中國，其唬爛，懸而未決的台灣獨立問題，特別是破壞台灣與美國的夥伴關係；

是以，為了驗證這一說法，終結九二共識的現實是非常重要的！

其實，台灣獨立議題出現在20世紀90年代；

簡單來說，一個自由，民主與獨立的國家轉型，而不是歷史與文化的陳述！

不過，這不再是妨礙美國，中國與台灣關係；

舉例來說，民進黨支持獨立，當時的總統陳水扁，衝撞在2005年中國通過反分裂國家法；

另言之，這是暴力歷史與文化左翼份子的遊戲！

但是，前總統喬治華盛頓布希曾經宣布美國立場：

台灣不能挑釁中國，如果中國用武力實現統一台灣，那美國將協防台灣！

這份文件說明美國不支持任何形式台灣獨立；

另言之，這一政策立場有效地穩定台灣海峽的現狀！

所以，暴力歷史與文化左翼份子又嘗試進行破壞中國大陸與台灣之間的安全，穩定與平衡；

事實上，中國與台灣之間的相對穩定的經濟與政治平衡是馬英九總統啟動一個穩定的經濟與合作世代！

神話的九二共識－中國攻打台灣

從中國的角度來看，古老的"堅持"主張在台灣是不容置疑的！

古老的"堅持"主張有效性的前提是否對方擔心失去歷史與文化的話語權；

另外，台灣人喜歡現狀的自由與獨立，而不是歷史與文化！

同時，中國軍事力量行為的威脅自歷史與文化，嘗試阻擋台灣分離，因為台灣能夠監控海峽兩岸！

總之，台灣歷史與文化理念作為主張，沒有考慮到中國影響力，與複雜化談判的可能性！

神話的九二共識－歷史與文化的拍賣

雖然，美國與中國和好是一個基礎策略部署，是以保持美國的關鍵利益，必須評估美國的反應；

特別是美國與中國關係，才是關鍵改變中國的歷史潮流！

尤其是歷史與文化缺乏承諾與接納美國，僅是取得台灣控制權！

自由與獨立，沒有靈丹妙藥

終結歷史，夥伴關係的理念，提供一個創造性的策略，以解決暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義；

台灣問題不可能一次解決，但自由與獨立的現狀已經充當未來中國與台灣關係的基礎平台；

是以我們應該維持現狀！

作為台灣2016年3月總統大選，九二共識的理念就顯得不好！

簡單來說，當前台灣問題不是不好，與有必要進行反擊暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義！

最後是，九二共識是安全與穩定的國家共識，與反擊暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義！