POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 DEC 13 2015
How to view history and culture to oppose National leader , indeed ,history and culture have lacked of National ideology since they knew little about it.
In turn,that makes sense,over the past few years,history and culture have always repeatedly said that we came originally from a big family.
But,an analysis of history with me is to be ware of seeing false mirror images of history and culture.
Put simply,do not presume history and culture ; you will in the same way of the models of "BIG WORDS" , that will likely mislead your thinking and actions,in similar situations.
For instance,history and culture have in dealing with the problem that you think you understand it , but you don't ; history and culture have never been thought ; such as China.
For instance , history and culture think the globe is not like it ; you look at our histtory and culture are that you think that we are the same ; but you are wrong , we do not like shameful history and culture in peoples' around the world.
Despite a new "BIG WORDS" ,Taiwan should remain at crisis of unlimited over shameful history and culture , and in such situations little can be more dangerous than misreading your history and culture adversary.
So , I am right : Taiwan should not mirror-image history and culture , since they enjoy ""BIG WORDS" ; one neglected question is that of what history and culture have never clarified the Taiwan , even the R.O.C..
Have history and culture followed their texts , or do they think Taiwanese , including President Ma Ying-jeou will act and react as ? Does history and culture care about how Taiwanese think , what their motives and ideas are?
As history and facts turn out , almost nothing.
Shamefulness of history and culture negative views of the Taiwan,and threat to R.O.C..
Because of shameful history and culture,which are typically accused in an Anti-freedom and independence,and of blaming the Taiwan for rebellious group.
But there is evidence of any rebellious views in the early of Taiwan's history and culture.
As I am of Taiwan in the 1950s,and I did not condemn the R.O.C. of destroying history and culture.
In turn,I publicly show for the R.O.C. on the miscalculations of the National Commander and their mishandling of reforms in the 16 years of the 21st century.
Shamefulness of history and culture negative views of the Taiwan,and threat to the R.O.C.,and seem to have been metamorphosis ; over the course of their interactions : destroying the process of stability and security with the Cross-Strait relationships.
TAIWAN,Tsai Ing-wen's ACTION MAN - 台灣窮小子
My thoughts on the R.O.C. during key phases of my life : I did not do what one is told.
My youth in Taiwan,and the KMT had been troublesome with me , including the Taiwnese groups.
I did not study English so good,and enjoying telling the truth - I love Tsai Ing-wen ; in addition to the Pennsylvania state of the U.S. , please,do not condemn me as well.
During my early Taiwan's experiences in 1970s and 1980s ; shamefulness of history and culture seemed dangerous and unpredictable.
The 1980s confrontation of history and culture,while they had détente,but they had again become a apparent and real danger - shamefulness of history and culture were thoroughly convinced that the Taiwan posed a real political,anmd military threats.
May 1995 brought missile crisis,and after 10 years,raised the specter of a holocaust - Evil Anti-Secession Law.
By contrast, shamefulness of history and culture have never offered an opportunity of freedom and independence,and as part of effort to push in cooperation of new model of partnership.
But to I knowledge shamefulness of history and culture neither had any experience of living or working in the Taiwan.
That is shamefulness of history and culture,and were not in response to history,which Taiwan was still part of China.
As it was difficult to believe,even seeing shamefulness of history and culture with their eyes,and then came the real intervention.
The "BIG WORDS" of shamefulness of history as a strategic deployment of expanding influence in the Taiwan,even the R.O.C.,not as an effort to deal with a Stateism.
Shamefulness of history and culture took superiority of the R.O.C. National system and conceptions of human rights , the protection of the civilian Taiwanese ; not in order to defend National values of freedom and independence - but rather ... in a struggle against Taiwan.
Their final objective is annihilation of Taiwan.
The revolution was not spontaneous,which were in no way proper for for either strategy ; or the traditions,the Taiwan's history and culture of
Taiwanese people - The "SunFlower" was replaced by the "Taiwanese banana".
In the end,End of history-the modernization partnerships to push,and help protective Taiwan to the Globe,and will be combined with civil-society development of Taiwanese people.
With this explanation,I effectively declared that my American education was complete,with the Taiwanese,in particular,Tsai Ing-wen's "Action Man".
By 2015,as the predicament in Taiwan began to show,the view of shamefulness of history and culture had become dark indeed.
As my supposition told : Taiwan strived to be in dialogue,at first,we want National relations to be equal, open, and honest ; and we want to strengthen the confidence.rather than shamefulness of history and culture.
But we have not seen reciprocal interactions,and because of a lack of direct contacts with the conventional history and culture ; so as I argue that they have already denude ,and cheated the Taiwan,even the R.O.C..
【Tsai Ing-wen's ACTION MAN 】
【I WAS BEING EDUCATED BY THE NATIONAL HISTORY,CULTURE,AND MILITARY-HUMANISM】