窮小子冷眼輯

【蔡英文的真命天子】

【我的國家歷史，文化，與軍事人文哲學教育】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 DEC 13 2015

How to view history and culture to oppose National leader , indeed ,history and culture have lacked of National ideology since they knew little about it.

In turn,that makes sense,over the past few years,history and culture have always repeatedly said that we came originally from a big family.

But,an analysis of history with me is to be ware of seeing false mirror images of history and culture.

Put simply,do not presume history and culture ; you will in the same way of the models of "BIG WORDS" , that will likely mislead your thinking and actions,in similar situations.

For instance,history and culture have in dealing with the problem that you think you understand it , but you don't ; history and culture have never been thought ; such as China.

For instance , history and culture think the globe is not like it ; you look at our histtory and culture are that you think that we are the same ; but you are wrong , we do not like shameful history and culture in peoples' around the world.

Despite a new "BIG WORDS" ,Taiwan should remain at crisis of unlimited over shameful history and culture , and in such situations little can be more dangerous than misreading your history and culture adversary.

So , I am right : Taiwan should not mirror-image history and culture , since they enjoy ""BIG WORDS" ; one neglected question is that of what history and culture have never clarified the Taiwan , even the R.O.C..

Have history and culture followed their texts , or do they think Taiwanese , including President Ma Ying-jeou will act and react as ? Does history and culture care about how Taiwanese think , what their motives and ideas are?

As history and facts turn out , almost nothing.

Shamefulness of history and culture negative views of the Taiwan,and threat to R.O.C..

Because of shameful history and culture,which are typically accused in an Anti-freedom and independence,and of blaming the Taiwan for rebellious group.

But there is evidence of any rebellious views in the early of Taiwan's history and culture.

As I am of Taiwan in the 1950s,and I did not condemn the R.O.C. of destroying history and culture.

In turn,I publicly show for the R.O.C. on the miscalculations of the National Commander and their mishandling of reforms in the 16 years of the 21st century.

Shamefulness of history and culture negative views of the Taiwan,and threat to the R.O.C.,and seem to have been metamorphosis ; over the course of their interactions : destroying the process of stability and security with the Cross-Strait relationships.

TAIWAN,Tsai Ing-wen's ACTION MAN - 台灣窮小子

My thoughts on the R.O.C. during key phases of my life : I did not do what one is told.

My youth in Taiwan,and the KMT had been troublesome with me , including the Taiwnese groups.

I did not study English so good,and enjoying telling the truth - I love Tsai Ing-wen ; in addition to the Pennsylvania state of the U.S. , please,do not condemn me as well.

During my early Taiwan's experiences in 1970s and 1980s ; shamefulness of history and culture seemed dangerous and unpredictable.

The 1980s confrontation of history and culture,while they had détente,but they had again become a apparent and real danger - shamefulness of history and culture were thoroughly convinced that the Taiwan posed a real political,anmd military threats.

May 1995 brought missile crisis,and after 10 years,raised the specter of a holocaust - Evil Anti-Secession Law.

By contrast, shamefulness of history and culture have never offered an opportunity of freedom and independence,and as part of effort to push in cooperation of new model of partnership.

But to I knowledge shamefulness of history and culture neither had any experience of living or working in the Taiwan.

That is shamefulness of history and culture,and were not in response to history,which Taiwan was still part of China.

As it was difficult to believe,even seeing shamefulness of history and culture with their eyes,and then came the real intervention.

The "BIG WORDS" of shamefulness of history as a strategic deployment of expanding influence in the Taiwan,even the R.O.C.,not as an effort to deal with a Stateism.

Shamefulness of history and culture took superiority of the R.O.C. National system and conceptions of human rights , the protection of the civilian Taiwanese ; not in order to defend National values of freedom and independence - but rather ... in a struggle against Taiwan.

Their final objective is annihilation of Taiwan.

The revolution was not spontaneous,which were in no way proper for for either strategy ; or the traditions,the Taiwan's history and culture of

Taiwanese people - The "SunFlower" was replaced by the "Taiwanese banana".

In the end,End of history-the modernization partnerships to push,and help protective Taiwan to the Globe,and will be combined with civil-society development of Taiwanese people.

With this explanation,I effectively declared that my American education was complete,with the Taiwanese,in particular,Tsai Ing-wen's "Action Man".

By 2015,as the predicament in Taiwan began to show,the view of shamefulness of history and culture had become dark indeed.

As my supposition told : Taiwan strived to be in dialogue,at first,we want National relations to be equal, open, and honest ; and we want to strengthen the confidence.rather than shamefulness of history and culture.

But we have not seen reciprocal interactions,and because of a lack of direct contacts with the conventional history and culture ; so as I argue that they have already denude ,and cheated the Taiwan,even the R.O.C..

【Tsai Ing-wen's ACTION MAN 】

【I WAS BEING EDUCATED BY THE NATIONAL HISTORY,CULTURE,AND MILITARY-HUMANISM】

如何看待歷史與文化，反對國家領導？

其實是歷史與文化，缺少，知之甚少的國家意識！

在過去的幾年裏，歷史與文化一直在說，它原本來自一個大家庭，另言之，這是有道理的；

但是，台灣窮小子的歷史分析是，注意看到的鏡影都是歷史與文化的假象！

簡單來說，不要假設歷史與文化在類似的狀況下，你會以同樣的唬爛模式，誤導您的思考和行動；

舉例來說，歷史與文化處理問題是，你認為你已經了解歷史與文化，從來沒有想一想，或如中國!；

舉例來說，歷史與文化認為，全世界不喜歡你看我們的歷史與文化，你會想想，我們是相同的；

但是，歷史與文化錯了，全球民眾不喜歡，不要臉的歴史與文化！

在這種情況下，台灣應該保持對不要臉的歴史與文化不受限制的危機；

儘管，新的唬爛，所以，很少會比誤讀您的歷史與文化敵人更危險！

所以，台灣窮小子是正確的；

台灣不應該用鏡子看歷史與文化，因為它們喜歡唬爛；

被忽視的問題是歷史與文化從來不知道如何解釋台灣，甚至，中華民國！

歷史與文化有遵循自己的課文，或者它們認為台灣人，包括總統馬英九，他會採取行動，有所反應；

難道歷史與文化，甚至關心台灣人怎麼想想，動機和理念！

歷史與事實證明幾乎沒有！

不要臉歷史與文化不利台灣的觀點，並威脅到中華民國

因為不要臉歷史與文化，通常指控反自由與獨立，與有鑑於唬爛，並指責台灣為叛亂集團；

但在早期的台灣歷史與文化沒有任何叛亂觀點的證據！

作為台灣在二十世紀五零年代，台灣窮小子並沒有譴責，破壞中華民國的歷史與文化；

另言之，台灣窮小子公開說明中華民國對國家指揮官的錯誤，與二十一世紀，十六年的不當改革；

不要臉歷史與文化不利台灣與威脅到中華民國似乎已經變態；

在他們的互動，破壞海峽兩岸穩定與安全的進程！

台灣，台灣窮小子，蔡英文的真命天子

我在，我生命的主要階段的想法，在中華民國是不聽話！

我的青年時期在台灣，國民黨與台灣派很頭痛；

我的英文不好，喜歡說實話，就是喜歡蔡英文；

在我早期的台灣經驗，在二十世紀七，八零年代，不要臉歷史與文化，很危險與難以預測；

八零年代對峙的歷史與文化，雖有緩和，但是，它們又重新成為一個明顯而現實的危險；

不要臉歷史與文化徹底相信台灣構成真正的政軍威脅！

1995年五月帶來飛彈危機，十年後，並提出毀滅的幽靈－邪惡的反分裂國家法！

相比之下，不要臉歷史與文化從不提供自由與獨立機會，與人交流，並作為努力加強新模式夥伴合作關係；

但據我所知道，不要臉歷史與文化沒有任何生活經驗，甚至，工作狀態在台灣；

這是不要臉歷史與文化，台灣仍然是中國的一部分－不負責的歷史！

是以，這是很難相信，甚至看到不要臉歷史與文化的眼睛，隨後而來真正的干預；

不要臉歷史與文化的唬爛，擴大影響力在台灣，甚至，中華民國；

而不是為了應對國家主義的一類策略部署！

不要臉歷史與文化奪走中華民國國家制度與人權理念，台灣公民保護的優勢，

不是為了防衛自由與獨立的國家價值，而對台灣的鬥爭！

他們的最終目標是毀滅台灣！

革命不是自發的，這是絕不適合台灣人的任何策略，或傳統的台灣歷史與文化－太陽花運動被更換成台灣香蕉！

最後是，終結歷史，現代化夥伴關係是驅動與幫助保護台灣加入全球，與台灣人公民社會的發展；

有了這個說明，台灣窮小子能夠有效地宣稱，我的美國與台灣教育是完整的，特別是蔡英文的真命天子！

到2015年，台灣窘境開始浮現，不要臉歷史與文化的觀點確實變得黑暗！

正如我的總結說，台灣努力在對話，

首先，希望國家關係是平等的，開放的，與誠實，與強化互信，而不是不要臉歷史與文化！

但是，我們還沒有看到相互的聯繫，因為缺乏與傳統的歷史與文化直接接觸；

是以，台灣窮小子認為它們早已經拒絕與欺騙台灣，甚至，中華民國！