NATO.jpg

【進擊的北大西洋公約組織】 

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之真命天子
28 , APRIL , 2018
 

NATO makes attacks - Re-modulating Strategy
NATO must re-modulate strategy - when it confronted a security challenge , and option of whether to employ military force.
We have another look at Left-wing's history and culture over the past three decades.
These historical stories meant countries in the Europe that they were free and independent to seek foreign policies and partnership - according with the strategic objective of the United States was to establish a Europe that is comprehensive , free , and secure.
Historically , Russia's concept of security order is not related to the Europe , so it does not persuade Russia.
For instance , the Russian's President Putin would not joint the NATO.
Historically , the NATO has consensus emerged , combined with specific efforts to elevate NATO's relationship with Russia ; and ultimately came to define the to European security. 
As the Global partners , Russia had agreed that country have the right to freely choose their political framework.
The NATO should be taking powerful deployments to deter Russia enlargement or punish Left-wing's groups.
Indeed , Russia was a nascent freedom , which made Russia dependent on the Right-wing's independence and freedom , and respected Russia's global  role , in particular , helped Russia walks away from economic troubles.
There should be extension of NATO.
In the long term , such a decision taken by European stability and security , does not provoking the interests of Russia.
Historically , Russian showed an anti-West sentiment.
Russia would not accept the NATO.
This purely Left-wing's expansion does not let European face the current threat , and also cannot deter as the terrorist attacks or restore stability and security in European.
For instance , Russian wanted to keep political and economic influence across the region.
NATO must be realized that he would not be able to stop Russia , acknowledging that we do have right to choose the form of security it considers most effective.
Conclusions
Although U.S. and NATO efforts to balance the relations with the Russia , but lacks of partnership with the Russia.
Moreover , Russian has already accomplished the New Model of National Security concept.
Russia today is emphasizing new military intervention and saber-rattling as options to push National objectives.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
【MARCH ON NATO】 

北大西洋公約組織出擊戰略改寫?
北大西洋公約組織必須調整戰略;
當面對安全挑戰與選項,是否動用軍事力量?
在過去三十年裡,審視左翼歷史與文化;
端視美國的策略目標是建立一個全面性自由與安全的歐洲;
這個歷史故事意味歐洲國家能夠採取自由與獨立的外交政策與夥伴關係!
歷史上來說,俄羅斯的安全秩序理念不相關於歐洲;
是以不需要說服俄羅斯!
舉例來說,俄羅斯總統普丁不會加入北大西洋公約組織;
歷史上來說,北大西洋公約組織曾經與俄羅斯出現共識;
特別努力提升關係,簡單來說,最終定義歐洲安全!
作為全球夥伴,俄羅斯同意有權自由選擇政治架構!
北約應該採取強有力的部署來嚇阻俄羅斯的擴大,或懲罰左翼集團;
事實上,俄羅斯僅是一個新興的自由國家;
俄羅斯依賴右邊獨立與自由的支持,尊重俄羅斯的全球角色;
特別是幫助俄羅斯走出經濟困境!
北約的力量應該要擴大!
自長遠來看,為了歐洲穩定與安全而採取這樣的決定,並不挑釁俄羅斯利益;
自歷史上來說,俄羅斯有反西方情緒!
俄羅斯本來就不會接受北約;
這類純粹的左翼擴張並不能讓歐洲面對當前的威脅;
也不能嚇阻恐怖攻擊,或恢復歐洲安全與穩定!
舉例來說,俄羅斯要保有區域政治與經濟影響力;
北約必須意識到無法阻止俄羅斯,與承認有權選擇最有效的安全模式!
結論
雖然,美國與北約努力平衡與俄羅斯的關係;
但是,缺乏與俄羅斯的夥伴關係!
此外,俄羅斯早已經完成新模式國家安全學理;
今天,俄羅斯強調新軍事干預與打擊,作為驅動國家目標的選擇!

 

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(1) 人氣()