49682518_10155581302006065_7231612130502377472_n.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說台灣人的志氣】
POSTED BY  台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN,Tsai Ing-wen,(the son of destiny)
FIRST,JAN,2019

 

【總統 蔡英文說;要講大聲點,恩,當蔡英文是四十歲時,早已經講得很大聲,蔡英文還是有真命天子!】
破碎的國家承諾

為什麼?
從過去,現在到未來,台灣人沒有得到,而不會越來越不想要國家承諾?
大多數的台灣人希望相同的事-穩定優先;最重要的是,經濟繁榮;是以,在這個定義,國家能夠驅動讓人滿意的政治價值;那做台灣人從國家承諾有甚麼呢?
其實,台灣人,多半想要合理與安全,並且,相信他們的國家是善良的一面!
但是,當我們回顧過去,我們不相信眼前發生的離譜運動;到底是甚麼不能給台灣人的國家承諾,與政策;當陳水扁,馬英九,與蔡英文,走進總統府?
事實上,在任一個狀況下,國家承諾發表確定地,不現實的歷史與文化,基本上不成功的經濟學;歷史與文化的失敗比別人差勁-沒有給台灣人,一個國家承諾,或者每個人都想要;他,缺乏國家戰略眼光,與擴大台灣的安全危機是高成本;直到現在,所有的新安全承諾不會實現!
其次,兩千年大選,陳水扁,缺乏政策經驗,並且,依賴於所謂左翼歷史與文化,忽略有決定性台灣鐵血主義血統;
蔡英文,答應台灣人的國家承諾-維持現狀,這將是強大的;但是,謙卑,為歷史與文化的誤導!
總之,台灣人被告知,台灣將集中在歷史與文化政治,避免國家戰略重要性的自由與獨立,並保持左翼的唬爛;歷史與文化為台灣人誤導全球理念,而不是給台灣人;然後,傳播與生俱來的自由與獨立,因為我知道它是有效的!
歷史與文化,不可能是一個真正的誠實中間人,或者,唬爛的無限膨脹;總之,台灣已經失去右翼的國家承諾,甚至,不可缺少的國家秩序與共識!
歷史與文化-前言不搭後語,它們僅會唬爛事情不同;那為什麼台灣人不能得到我們想要的國家承諾?
出於相同的理由,歷史與文化,膨脹威脅,誇大軍事力量,謙卑,並讓台灣政治覆蓋廣泛的唬爛;其實,真正的原因是台灣人,沒有擁有我們想要的自由與獨立的國家承諾!

首先,美國海軍上將,尼米茲說過~~~我們沒有錢,所以,必須要思考;因此,台灣是不安全的,它主要是來自愚蠢的歷史與文化!
其次,現狀是根深蒂固的左翼歷史與文化;這也有助於解釋,為什麼陳水扁與馬英九不願意終結歷史的態度,與承諾!
是以,我的台灣人鄉親~~~這就是為什麼我們沒有得到,或我們想要,或應得的國家承諾!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
01042019-3.jpg

【THE BROKEN NATIONAL COMMITMENT OF THE R.O.C.】 
【TAIWANESE BLOOD-AND IRON POLICY】 

The broken commitment for the Country.
And why , from the past to now to the future , Taiwanese have not gotten - and will not be getting the National Commitment they want.
The same things that most Taiwanese want - stability first and principal , followed by economic prosperity , so as the sanse that country will be able to push desirable political value - what do Taiwanese from the National Commitment?
Indeed , Taiwanese , they want to be reasonably , and safe , and believe their country is on the side of the kind-hearted.
But as we look back the past , the too far out campaign that is going on the before for unbelievable eye - what on earth failed to give the Taiwanese people the National commitment , when Chen Shui-Bian , Ma Ying-jeou , and Tsai Ing-wen , they ran for presidential palace.
In fact , in any case , the National commitment delevered a decidedly unrealistic history and culture , and fundamentally unsuccessful economy.
Failed history and culture worse than other , but none gave the Taiwanese people the National commitment or that the people seem to have wanted.
For instance , Ma Ying-jeou , struggling to win historical status , said a bid for the trying very hard to economy.
he lacked of views of the National strategy , and expanding Taiwan's security crisis would be high-cost.
Untill now ,all those new secure commitment will never have to be honored. 
Next , consider the 2000 election , Chen Shui-Bian , who lacking policy-experience , and relied on the so-called Left-wing's history and culture , overlooking had decidedly Taiwanese blood-and-iron policy pedigrees. 
Tsai Ing-wen promised Taiwanese people the National commitment - maintaining the status quo that would be powerful , but "unpretentious" for misguided efforts at history and culture.
In short , Taiwanese were tild that Taiwan would focus on history and culture politics , avoid freedom and independence of National strategic importance , and keep "Big Words" of Leftists.
History and culture convert Taiwanese people to our misguided global view , instead of giving Taiwanese people , and than spread inherent freedom and independence , since I do know how well that worked.
History and culture would made impossible to be a sincere for honest broker , or to the endless expansion of Big Words.
In short , Taiwan has lost a Right-wing's National commitment , even indispensability of National order and common consensus.
History and culture , however , incoherently , that they had made a bunch of Big Words differently. 
So why do not taiwanese people get the National commitment we want?
For the same reasonsn - history and culture , they are inflating threats , and exaggerating the military force , being too humble , so that making Taiwan's politics override broader Big Words.
Indeed , the real reasons Taiwanese people do not own the National commitment of freedom and independence we want.
First , the U.S. admiral , Chester William Nimitz , said , " We are out of money , so we must think " - so Taiwan is not secure , and it is mostly from the consequences of stupid history and culture.
Second , the status quo is well-entrenched Left-wing's history and culture , and that helps explain why Ma Ying-jeou and Chen Shui-Bian are unwilling to end of history attitudes , commitments.
And that , my fellow Taiwanese people , are why we are not owning the National commitment we want or deserve.

 

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()