POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN，Tsai Ing-wen，(the son of destiny)
【THE BROKEN NATIONAL COMMITMENT OF THE R.O.C.】
【TAIWANESE BLOOD-AND IRON POLICY】
The broken commitment for the Country.
And why , from the past to now to the future , Taiwanese have not gotten - and will not be getting the National Commitment they want.
The same things that most Taiwanese want - stability first and principal , followed by economic prosperity , so as the sanse that country will be able to push desirable political value - what do Taiwanese from the National Commitment?
Indeed , Taiwanese , they want to be reasonably , and safe , and believe their country is on the side of the kind-hearted.
But as we look back the past , the too far out campaign that is going on the before for unbelievable eye - what on earth failed to give the Taiwanese people the National commitment , when Chen Shui-Bian , Ma Ying-jeou , and Tsai Ing-wen , they ran for presidential palace.
In fact , in any case , the National commitment delevered a decidedly unrealistic history and culture , and fundamentally unsuccessful economy.
Failed history and culture worse than other , but none gave the Taiwanese people the National commitment or that the people seem to have wanted.
For instance , Ma Ying-jeou , struggling to win historical status , said a bid for the trying very hard to economy.
he lacked of views of the National strategy , and expanding Taiwan's security crisis would be high-cost.
Untill now ,all those new secure commitment will never have to be honored.
Next , consider the 2000 election , Chen Shui-Bian , who lacking policy-experience , and relied on the so-called Left-wing's history and culture , overlooking had decidedly Taiwanese blood-and-iron policy pedigrees.
Tsai Ing-wen promised Taiwanese people the National commitment - maintaining the status quo that would be powerful , but "unpretentious" for misguided efforts at history and culture.
In short , Taiwanese were tild that Taiwan would focus on history and culture politics , avoid freedom and independence of National strategic importance , and keep "Big Words" of Leftists.
History and culture convert Taiwanese people to our misguided global view , instead of giving Taiwanese people , and than spread inherent freedom and independence , since I do know how well that worked.
History and culture would made impossible to be a sincere for honest broker , or to the endless expansion of Big Words.
In short , Taiwan has lost a Right-wing's National commitment , even indispensability of National order and common consensus.
History and culture , however , incoherently , that they had made a bunch of Big Words differently.
So why do not taiwanese people get the National commitment we want?
For the same reasonsn - history and culture , they are inflating threats , and exaggerating the military force , being too humble , so that making Taiwan's politics override broader Big Words.
Indeed , the real reasons Taiwanese people do not own the National commitment of freedom and independence we want.
First , the U.S. admiral , Chester William Nimitz , said , " We are out of money , so we must think " - so Taiwan is not secure , and it is mostly from the consequences of stupid history and culture.
Second , the status quo is well-entrenched Left-wing's history and culture , and that helps explain why Ma Ying-jeou and Chen Shui-Bian are unwilling to end of history attitudes , commitments.
And that , my fellow Taiwanese people , are why we are not owning the National commitment we want or deserve.