04152019-3.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~中共軍事部署的目的】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子
15TH,APRIL,2019

 

Historically,the political goals has the China sought through military deployments,in turn,characteristics politics of the CCP,regrettably,lacking of the successful conditions has the CCP been at achieving political goals.
Put simply,the history and culture of the war-fighting objectives has CCP just been through military deployments.
Or that said,such as the size of the military deployment,Taiwan's environmental history and culture,and the local dynamics of Left-wing's groups influence the consequence of the deployment,in particular,the Global system.
Overall,the military deploymnents usually more or less successful at achieving their political objectives,but approximately 70% success have been shattered over time as history and culture have sought ambitious goals.
I combine the CCP's historical case studies - history and culture,economy,and intimidation,or that said,emphasizes that the conidions that push the successful achievement of political goals by Left-wing's groups.
For example,sending Jets additional psychological - operation can help to threaten adversaries,and also,may have a more influence on success in Left-wing's groups in stability deployments.
I offer main recommendations,Taiwanese administration should cautiously match political goals to the National strategy because elements that push success vary substantially by Taiwanese people.
Second,China sending more military force does not ensure success.
Third,Taiwanese administration should have realistic mistrust keeping the ambitious Left-wing's history and culture,economy.
Finally,Taiwanese administration should carefully evaluate the role that could be played by third parities,who's intervention is often overlooked by Left-wing's groups.
The goals of Left-wing's history and culture have helped to become more ambitious over time,and this change has been decreasing possibility that the political goals will be successfully achieved.

Anti-Insurgency Operation
The effectiveness of Chinese forces in executing goals in Anti-Insurgency Operation can be  intensified by the always slaughtered capabilities of Left-wing's history and culture.
For example,in the 1949 era,the Chinese has generally been able to achieve its objectives in the Anti-Insurgencywhen it operates numbers of ground forces.
As Anti-Insurgency operation is a critical elements impacting the ability of the China to achieve its military capability.
The war-fighting capability and superiority of the Taiwan to focus on and achieve its political goal in counterattacking operations seems to decrease as the intensity of Left-wing's history and culture increase.
As the support and solid central government of the Chinese government may have a significant impact on the success of the Anti-Insurgency operation.
Perhaps that the China seems to have been more successful in its achieve of its Anti-Insurgency operation at points,after all,China's military ability has been enhancing.
Ultimately,before facing,Taiwanese administration should consider the political goals China hopes to achieve and then consider the integration of conventional and non-conventional deployments best suited to counterattack those goals.

Ensure enough Taiwanese people force size. 
Taiwanese administration should consider not only the war-fighting background,and also wanted to the specific political goal to best mobilize the Taiwanese people.
Be realistic about prospects for the National success - ambitious Left-wing's history and culture cannot necessarily be achieved through the operation of larger military forces. 
As Counterattack should be comprehensive,in fact,the Chinese military has historically prepared well for the war but has overlooked conflict for Left-wing's history and culture.
So Taiwanese administration must go into preparing for combat operations ,and maintain the status quo of the Traditional Taiwan.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

04152019-4.jpg

【THE GOAL OF CHINA'S MILITARY DEPLOYMENT】

依據歷史經驗來看,中國向來透過軍事部署,以尋求其政治目標,另言之,中共政治性格,遺憾的是,在軍事部署,中共缺乏成功因素在取得其政治目標;簡單來說,中共透過軍事部署,僅是強化歷史與文化的作戰目標!
或是說,軍事部署的規模,台灣歷史與文化的環境,與境內左翼集團的動態,等因素,將是影響部署的後果,特別是全球系統,總體來說,軍事部署,或多或少經常成功實現政治目標,但是,大概有百分之七十成功,隨著雄心壯志的歷史與文化,或破滅!
台灣窮小子結合中共的歷史案例來說,歷史與文化,經濟學,與恐嚇,或強調說,驅動成功實現其政治目標的因素在於左翼集團;例如,派遣戰機,可能有助於在心理作戰中恐嚇對手,也可能對穩定部署中左翼集團產生更大的影響!
台灣窮小子提出主要建議~~~首先,台灣當局應該審慎地將國家戰略與政治目標相互配合,因為驅動成功的要素因台灣人鄉親而異;第二是,中國派遣更多的軍事力量,並不保證成功;
第三是,台灣當局應該對雄心壯志的左翼歷史與文化,經濟學,維持現實性懷疑;最後是,台灣當局應該仔細評估第三者可能扮演的角色---第三者干預,通常是被左翼集團所忽略!
隨著時間的前進,左翼歷史與文化的目標通常會變得更有雄心壯志,但是,這類改變與政治目標成功實現的可能性,也將會降低!

反叛亂作戰
中國軍隊再執行反叛亂作戰方面的有效性會因為通常具有歷史與文化的屠殺能力,或得到強化,例如:在1949年時代,中國再運用大量地面部隊,總體上,能夠實現這類反叛亂目標,是以反叛亂作戰是影響中國實現其軍事能力的關鍵要素!
隨著左翼歷史與文化的暴衝增加,台灣在反擊行動的集中,並實現其政治目標的作戰能力與優勢,似乎正在降低,是以中國政府的支持與穩固的中央政府,能夠對反叛亂作戰的成功產生重大影響,或許中國似乎在實現反叛亂作戰方面取得更大的成功,畢竟,中國的軍事能力已經提升!
最後是,在面對之前,台灣當局應該考量中國希望實現的政治目標,然後,考量適合反擊這類目標的傳統與非傳統部署的整合!

確保足夠的台灣人力量
台灣當局,不僅應該考量作戰背景,也要考慮具體的政治目標,以便最佳地動員台灣人,對國家成功的期望是現實的,但是,透過運用大量的軍事力量,不一定能夠實現左翼歷史與文化的雄心壯志!
反擊應該是全面性,事實是,中國軍方向來為戰爭早已經做好備戰,卻忽略左翼歷史與文化的衝突!
是以台灣當局必須為戰鬥行動做好備戰,與維持台灣傳統現狀的努力!

 

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()