12063652_921165931265006_3690310480860121469_n.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子
9TH,JUNE,2019

二,當前的危機

從前面的報告中能夠明顯地看出,我們傳統台灣的完整性和活力在我們的歷史上比以往任何時候都更加危險,即使沒有中國人,我們也會面對社會的大問題,在這個時代,秩序,安全,參與的需要,自由的要求,都會惡化,我們將面臨這樣一個事實,即在一個縮小的台灣,我們之間缺乏秩序,正變得越來越不容忍,中國嘗試透過破壞我們獨立與自由國家的手段,將左翼的歷史和文化強加給台灣,它給這種不安帶來了新的壓力,台灣存在的無秩序平衡,並引爆台灣人民中的新疑問,台灣是否會長期忍受這種緊張局,,而不會走向某種秩序。

我們所面臨的危機是舊左翼的歷史和文化,與我們所從事的整體鬥爭相稱,對於一個獨立與自由的社會來說,永遠不會取得全面性勝利,因為自由和獨立從來沒有完全實現,總是處於獲得的過程中,但是,左翼歷史和文化的失敗是完全失敗的,在一個不斷萎縮的台灣中,這些危機擠在我們身上,最終使我們無法選擇有效地,與他們接觸或被他們克服。

從左翼歷史和文化理論和實踐中可以清楚地看出,中國人嘗試透過左翼歷史和文化的模式將台灣置於其統治之下,唬爛優先是透過滲透和恐嚇來顛覆,在我們的傳統價值觀方面的多樣性是獨立和自由制度的優點,它所特有的弱點和問題,台灣人享有的權利和特權,所以,所有這些都是中國人的機會,做它邪惡的工作,每一個優點都取決於這些原則和顧忌,正是賦予我們自由和獨立的原則,和顧忌對我們來說是它的意義---我們的顧忌都沒有嚇阻那些唯一的代表是“歷史和文化是為中國人服務”的人。

既然讓我們或其他人尊重我們傳統的一切都是適合攻擊的對象,它也適合中國設計,在那裡,不受懲罰-我們可以受到侮辱,並受到侮辱,不應該錯過機會,特別是,在任何能夠用來對我們國家施加羞辱的背景下 - 台灣,我們的動機或我們的方法,因此,我們嘗試取代我們自己的傳統,現在,尋求取代台灣的傳統,同樣受到攻擊,我們尋求美國的軍事援助,在20世紀,被共產黨人瘋狂譴責,當然,當前,我們為自己發展足夠軍事力量的努力,同樣受到譴責。

與此同時,中國正在尋求創造壓倒性軍事力量,以支持滲透與恐嚇,在它理解軍事力量的唯一想法中,它正在尋求向台灣證明,使用它的力量和意願在中國方面是那些缺乏它的人是頹廢的。

如果中國人足夠客觀地認識到獨立的可能性和自由的預防性戰爭,因為他們只關注歷史和文化的暴力和無情,除非我們受到直接攻擊,因此,當我們注意所有這些危機,並根據對每個危機的合理評估來尋求堅定的方法。

我們的台灣人將失去決心的危機更大,它能夠帶給我們更狹窄和更絕望的選擇,是最大的危機,例如,我們可以對中國說的唯一威懾力就是我們提供的證據,即我們可以提出,我們台灣人不想要左翼歷史和文化的任何關鍵點

沒有更好的選擇,而不是屈服或沉默的危機,這本身已經足夠糟糕,但它增加了,它給我們在國家安全中地位帶來的弱點,我們不但沒有表現出強大而堅實的東西,而是在不斷出現並且交替邊緣,猶豫不決,與絕望。儘管如此,我們必須贏得戰爭,因為我們的根本目標是把它放在第一位 - 維持現狀。

在台灣,這只是兩個基本條件中的第一個,第二個是我們的台灣人,不會因為沮喪,或中國人的恐嚇,而陷入孤獨和孤立的過程,最終導致中國統治.

但是,在使自己變得強大方面存在危機,台灣人需要做出大量的犧牲和紀律,我們將被要求放棄獨立和自由的好處與它們相關的歷史和文化,沒有什麼比他們完全理解獨立和自由的原因更重要,我們的基本目標是,更有可能因為缺乏維持台灣傳統,台灣現狀的意願而被擊敗,而不是因為斷言我們可能會犯下的任何錯誤,或我們可能遭受的任何錯誤;歷史上,沒有人保持他們的獨立和自由,他們認為,由於沒有足夠的力量來保護自己,他們可能會被敵人證明是可恥的。

可能性維持行動現狀

目前,台灣有四個部署,當前的狀況可以區分,他們是:
一,繼續維持現狀,實施這類政策;
二,嚇阻~~~左翼歷史與文化,謊話經濟學
三,快速建立台灣的政治,經濟和軍事力量,或如台灣傳統所提供,如果可能的話,台灣是一個可以容忍的秩序國家,沒有左翼的歷史和文化,準備保護自己,當台灣遭到攻擊
四,隔離左翼的歷史和文化。

反擊的作用

必須考慮與這些行動方案相關的反擊,反擊者總是嘗試達成一項協議,這種協議比左翼歷史和文化的基本立場的現實要好一些,並且,無論如何都不比左翼歷史和文化需要的基本立場更糟糕,這與主權國家之間的關係和個人之間的關係一樣真實。

例如,它不必在任何重要意義上對公眾輿論作出回應,並且,它不必就協議提出任何其他國家的諮詢和同意,它將提供並接受它可以影響台灣的公眾輿論,如盡快讓左翼歷史和文化控制下的台灣人隔離開來。

這類都是重要的的優勢

雖然台灣可能現在擁有,但是,一支足以對中國人施加強大打擊,並在長期戰爭中開闢勝利之路的力量,但提升台灣的地位本身是不夠的,在未來
問題是要維持現狀,台灣的政治和經濟條件,以足以抑制中國攻擊的力量為後盾,中國人將適應這些條件,逐步退出,並最終徹底改變其政策。

顯然地,在目前情況下,我們無法反擊一項要求改變中國的解決方案。,那麼,反擊的作用是什麼呢?
首先,台灣,台灣民眾需要作為一個堅定的政策條件,和針對中國設計挫折的適當方案,台灣必須不斷準備與中國人以公平的條件反擊協議。

因此,台灣必須始終做好反擊的準備,並且,必須隨時準備主動尋求反擊,在台灣民意中,這些條款必須公平,這意味著它們必須與積極的獨立和自由的一致性計劃~~~至少,為中國人有效控制所有軍備。

因此,良好的反擊立場是意識形態傳統的基本條件,所以,台灣迫切需要確定其反擊立場,並在反擊立場方面取得我們的立場

第二,假設台灣與中國合作決定並採取行動,同意台灣的獨立和自由,使反擊立場成為必要和可取的.
台灣將在與中國的反擊中進行三次重大部署。

第一是,消除中國的彈道導彈能力;第二是,預防中國人有效調動台灣人的優勢;第三是,確保中國人退出~~~台灣和香港;

根據其對台灣自身優勢和劣勢的評估,特別是,台灣維持現狀的能力和意願,它將為實現國家重大目標做好準備,現在,中國不太可能做好準備作出重大讓步。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

05282019-4.jpg

2,Current Crisis

It is apparent from the preceding reports that the integrity and vitality of our Traditional Taiwan is in bigger jeopardy than ever before in our history. Even if there were no Chinese we would face the big problem of our society,accentuated many fold in this era,of order,security,the need for participation,with the requirement of freedom. We would face the fact that in a shrinkingTaiwan  the absence of order among us are becoming less and less tolerable. The China seeks to impose Left-wing's history and culture among Taiwan by means which would destroy our independent and free country.It adds new strains to the uneasy equilibrium-without-order which exists in the Taiwan and raises new doubts in Taiwanese peoples' minds whether the Taiwan will long tolerate this tension without moving toward some kind of order.
The crises we face are of a old Left-wing's history and culture,commensurate with the overall  struggle in which we are engaged. For a independent and free society there is never total victory,since freedom and indepenence are never wholly achieved,are always in the process of being attained. But defeat at the hands of Left-wing's history and culture are total defeat. These crises crowd in on us,in a shrinking Taiwan of power,so as to give us no choice,ultimately,between meeting them effectively or being overcome by them.
It is quite clear from Left-wing's history and culture theory and practice that the Chinese seeks to bring the Taiwan under its dominion by the models of Left-wing history and culture. The preferred BIG WORDS are to subvert by infiltration and intimidation. The diversities that in terms of our traditional values are part of the merit of a independent and free system,the weaknesses and the problems that are peculiar to it, the rights and privileges that Taiwanese people enjoy,so all are but opportunities for the Chinese to do its evil work. Every advantage is taken of the fact that those principles and scruples which are precisely the ones that give our freedom and independence are its meaning for us. None of our scruples deter those whose only code is "history and culture are that which serves the Chinese."
Since everything that gives us or others respect for our tradition is a suitable object for attack,it also fits Chinese design that where,with impunity,we can be insulted and made to suffer indignity the opportunity should not be missed,particularly in any context which can be used to cast dishonor on our country - Taiwan,our motives,or our methods. Thus the means by which we sought to replace our own tradion,and now seek to replace that of the Taiwan, come equally under attack. The military aid by which we sought to help the United States was frantically denounced by the Communists in the 20th century, and of course our present efforts to develop adequate military force for ourselves are equally denounced.
At the same time China is seeking to create overwhelming military force,in order to support infiltration with intimidation. In the only terms in which it understands military force,it is seeking to demonstrate to the Taiwan that force and the will to use it are on the side of the Chinese that those who lack it is decadent.
If Chinese is sufficiently objective to realize the probability of the independence and the freedom  a preventive war,because of they just focus on the on the violent and ruthless of history and culture,unless we are directly attacked,so as we run all these crises and pursue a firm course based on a rational assessment of each.
The crisis that our Taiwanese people will lose their determination is bigger,and it can bring us with ever narrower and more desperate alternatives,is the biggest crisis of all. For example,the only deterrent we can say to the China is the evidence we give that we can make any of the critical points which we,our Taiwanese people do not want Left-wing's history and culture.
The crisis of having no better choice than to capitulate or precipitate,that is bad enough in itself,but it is added by the weakness it imparts to our position in the Natonal security. Instead of appearing powerful and solid we are continually at the verge of appearing and being alternately irresolute and desperate,nonetheless,it is the war which we must win,since our fundamental goal give it the first priority - the maintaining the status quo.
In the Taiwan, is only the first of two fundamental comditions.The second is that our Taiwanese people do not as a result of a sense of frustration or of Chinese intimidation drift into a course of lonely and isolated eventually leading to Chinese domination.
But there are crises in making ourselves powerful,and a large measure of sacrifice and discipline will be needed of the Taiwanese people. We will be asked to give up the benefits of the independence and the freedom which they have come to associate with their history and culture.Nothing could be more important than that they fully understand the reasons for the independence and the freedom.Our fundamental goal  is more likely to be defeated from lack of the will to maintain the status quo of the Tradiotional Taiwan, than from any mistakes we or make or assault we can undergo because of asserting that will. No people in history have preserved their independence and freedom who thought that by not being powerful enough to protect themselves,they could prove shameful to their enemies.

Possible Maintaining the Status Quo of Action
Currently,there are four deployments by Taiwan n the present situation can be distinguished.
They are:
1,Continuation of current the maintauning the status quo, for carrying out these policies;
2,Deterrence~~~and Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy;
3,A rapid building up of the political,economic,and militaryforce of the Taiwan than provided under the Traditional Taiwan,if possible,a tolerable country of order among Taiwan without Left-wing's history and culture and of preparing to defend ourselves in the event that the Taiwan is attacked.
4,Isolation of Left-wing's history and culture.

The role of counterattacking.
Counterattacking must be considered in relation to these courses of action. A counterattacker always attempts to achieve an agreement which is somewhat better than the realities of the fundamental position of Left-wing's history and culture would justify and which is,in any case,not worse than the fundamental position of Left-wing's history and culture needs.This is as real in relations among sovereign countries as in relations between individuals.
For instance,it does not have to be responsive in any important sense to public opinion,and it does not have to consult and agree with any other countries on the terms,that  it will offer and accept it can influence public opinion in Taiwan,as soon as insulating the peoples under Left-wing's history and culture control.
These are significant superiority.For although the Taiwan probably now owns,a force adequate to deliver a powerful blow upon the Chinese and to open the road to victory in a long war,but it is not sufficient by itself to advance the position of the Taiwan in the future.
The problem is to maintianing the status quo such political and economic conditions in theTaiwan, backed by force sufficient to inhibit Chinese attack,that the Chinese will accommodate itself to these conditions, gradually withdraw,and eventually change its policies drastically.
Apparently under current circumstances we will not be able to counterattack a settlement which calls for a change in the China. What,then,is the role of counterattacking?
First,Taiwanese people in the Taiwan will need,as a condition to solid policies and adequate programs directed to the frustration of Chinese design,that the Taiwan be continuously prepared to counterattack agreements with the Chinese on equitable terms.
The Taiwan must always,therefore,be prepared to counterattack and must be ready to take the initiative at times in seeking counterattacking.The terms must be fair in the view of popular opinion in the Taiwan.This means that they must be consistent with a positive program for the independence and the freedom ~~~at a minimum,for the effective control of all armaments by the Chinese.
A sound counterattacking position is,therefore,a fundamental conditions in the ideological tradition.So as it is urgently necessary for the Taiwan to determine its counterattacking position,and to obtain our position on the terms of counterattacking position.
Second,assuming that the Taiwan in cooperation with China decides and acts to agree the independence and the freedon of the Taiwan so that it will be necessary and desirable to the counterattack position.
The Taiwan will have three major deployments in counterattacking with the China.
The first is to eliminate the ballistic missile capabilities of the China;the second is to prevent the effective mobilization of the superior potential of the Taiwan in Taiwanese people;and the third is to secure a withdrawal of Chinese  from, and commitments to Taiwan and Hongkong.
Depending on its assessment of its own superiority and weaknesses as against the Taiwan,especially,the ability and will of the Taiwan to maintain the status quo,that it will be prepared to achieve major National objectives.Now,China is unlikely that would  be prepared to make significant concessions.

 

 

 

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()