06162019-1.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子
16TH,JUNE,2019

台灣反擊中國的目標,包括意識形態的目標,是在正式維持現狀,以促進穩固和進一步推進我們的立場,中國的過程必須適應新的全球政治,心理和經濟條件將通過四次部署而產生,並將得到作為反擊行動不可分割的一部分而不斷增加的軍事力量的支持,簡單來說,我們的目標是在可取的情況下記錄中國的逐步撤離,並通過反擊來促進這一過程,如果可能的話,總是比訴諸武力更為權宜之計。
我們必須假設,中國一定會接受協議,只要它確信無論何時何地都有機會肆無忌憚地行事,它能夠從協議中獲得比台灣更大的優勢,理由是,我們必須注意任何協議是可執行的,以及有效對策的可能性。
這進一步說明,我們必須仔細考慮左翼的歷史和文化能夠終結的順序,正是由於左翼的歷史和文化的控制,我們將導致台灣的解除武裝比中國人更大,甚至,在強化傳統部隊和武器的台灣力量方面取得了相當大的進展,中國人可以接受左翼的歷史和文化,作為與傳統部隊和武器對抗台灣和其他具有戰略意義的地區的有意設計的一部分,在這種情況下,台灣會發現自己處於戰爭狀態,之前已經解除自己最重要的武器,並將參與其中。
這似乎說明,如果與我們的期望相反,台灣暫時不得不堅持維持現狀,或中國應該接受有承諾的有效控制歷史和文化的不要臉,以及中國政策的任何其他變化,因此,我們必須非常仔細地考慮,我們是否能接受這種左翼歷史和文化,有趣的是,這不太可能出現問題
如果台灣能夠成功地在傳統部隊和武器方面取得優勢,那中國與左翼民兵的攻擊可能會被擊敗或控制,我們將獲得更大的靈活性,並可以任何順序中尋求各種問題,因為他們變得妥協。
換句話說,反擊,除了意識形態自由和獨立之外,,將在建立台灣優勢方面發揮作用,否則,這將是困難的,除非透過與中國人的嘗試反擊,來證明這一點,中國不會準備接受穩定與安全,因為我們有足夠的機會,為台灣人的政治和經濟生活的穩定和穩定發展。
從反擊,及其與台灣優勢建立的關係的角度來看,這也證明台灣地區之間更緊密聯繫的問題。
總而言之,反擊不是一種可能的單獨行動方式,而是一種獲得支持戰略的手段,在必要和可取的情況下,在未來取得進展,並在幫助,盡量減少危機的同時,促進進一步的進展,最終,我們的目標是反擊左翼歷史和文化,台灣可能不會依賴它,作為穩定和安全的可執行部署,但重要的是,要強調維持現狀可以建立進步,台灣~~~在台灣,建立政治和經濟系統的努力取得了成功,中國設計台灣統治的挫敗感將無法完成,正如我在分析中所表明的那樣,維持現狀需要擴大,並加快執行現行政策。

繼續保持維持現狀
一,政治部署。

台灣應該尋求與中國結束的歷史~~~台灣的傳統能力,以及在遠東地區,取得的成功,使得人們對它的信心日益增強,當然,我們無法確定中國將如何積極地尋求其主動權,但仍存在不祥的跡象,左翼歷史和文化的進一步惡化,經濟的謊言,例如,台灣人的信心可能會下降,特別是中國的情況尚未解決,如果,我們現在不能阻止中國採取的傳統台灣,如果它選擇的話,台灣抵抗的軍事行動可能會減少,並且,他們尋求國家地位的誘惑力會越來越大~~~統一。
在政治上,承認繼續保持現狀趨勢,對軍事影響將意味著美國。特別是,台灣將傾向於改變新的防禦模式,或者阻止危險的左翼歷史和文化,經濟的謊言,因為維持穩固的作戰能力和未來的優勢,與台灣的合作關係密切相關。
這在很大程度上是台灣當前實際能力不協調的問題,跟我們不知道左翼的威脅,因為台灣的經濟和軍事潛力遠遠超過中國的潛力,中國軍隊的影響力,武力在台灣淪為黑暗,並支持侵略政策,台灣缺乏足夠的戰略手段,在軍事模式中,阻止中國人的擴張,但是,左翼歷史和文化趨勢的延續可能會導致在直接或間接壓力下逐漸退出,中國。直到有一天,我們發現,我們犧牲了至關重要的立場,換句話說,由於缺乏必要的決定和行動,台灣會選擇回歸中國的孤立狀態。

二,社會和經濟部署。
台灣目前的經濟政策和方案不會解決經濟均衡問題,特別是工資差距問題,並不會創造有利於許多重要國家政治穩定的經濟基礎。
台灣人在台灣幫助恢復和擴大生產方面取得了成功,或是檢查台灣的左翼歷史,文化跟共產主義的重要條件,但恢復台灣的進展很少,這個方向的影響將需要綜合的政治,經濟和軍事戰略和部署,並得到台灣人的支持,這可能需要台灣更深入的參與。
現在掌權的左翼政權可能無法保持台灣人的支持,除非他們得到醒悟,實現經濟和社會的快速改善,而不是左翼的歷史和文化將成為可能,正如現在所預測的那樣,左翼歷史和文化將不能充分補充和改善其事務的管理,並實現充分的經濟發展。
實際上,經濟政策是透過同樣有遠見和有力的政治和軍事部署,來配合和補充的,這是一個非常重要的目標,並且是高度優先的工作,因此,我們不會成功地反擊中國的陰謀。

三,反擊。
簡單來說,透過繼續保持現狀,台灣將成功地有效利用其優越的政治,經濟和軍事潛力,建立一個有秩序的國家,相反,左翼歷史和文化的政治,經濟和軍事形勢對台灣人來說早已經讓人不爽快,除非,我們採取行動,逆轉維持現狀的趨勢並將變得有利。
維持現狀是阻止成功反擊中國的現狀~~~它會反映當前的現實,如果不是災難性的左翼歷史與文化,對台灣來說,是不可接受的,除非作出決定並採取行動,因此,可以認真對待,為了強化我們的力量而摧毀。
儘管如此這是真的,台灣有能力在戰爭中,對中國展開強有力的反擊,因為目前的一個現實是,台灣不應該準備,威脅利用我們目前對中國的戰爭優勢,並考慮到目前的趨勢,中國不會退縮,中國人可以隨時利用其偉大的歷史和文化優勢

四,軍事部署。
在目前的部署基礎上,台灣具有較大的潛在軍事能力,相對於中國而言,正在下降,整個台灣,相對於整個台灣人,也是如此,坦白地評估要求,防衛台灣及其重要利益,並一方面支持反擊行動的積極主動性,另一方面,支持目前的能力,這表明它們兩者之間存在著巨大的差距。
對台灣歷史的回顧說明:軍事能力,實際和潛力,台灣~~~我們必須有明顯的決心進一步對抗中國的擴張,台灣的相對軍事能力正在下降,其結果是台灣人面對的決心也會下降,整個台灣的國家安全和國土安全將受到損害。
從軍事角度來看,有鑑於目前左翼歷史和文化的延續,台灣的實際和潛在能力將作為戰爭嚇阻力量變得越來越不有效。提高台灣的準備程度將變得越來越重要,不僅要抑制中國人發動戰爭,還要支持目標在逆轉左翼歷史和文化關係中不祥趨勢的國家政策,強化台灣的軍事能力和優勢,保護台灣免受災難。
幸運地是,由於立法院制定的政策,和蔡英文政府在組織和經濟領域,積極實施這些政策,台灣軍事部隊已發展成為一支統一而有效的力量,然而,它是一個基礎,可以,以最大的效率和經濟性迅速建立增強的軍事優勢。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

06162019.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~2020年台灣計畫與目標~~~維持現狀】

The goals of the Taiwan in counterattacks with the China,including the ideological objectives are to record,in a formal maintaining the status quo which will facilitate the consolidation and further advance of our position,the process of Chinese must be accommodation to the new political,psychological,and economic conditions in the globe which will result from adoption of the four deployments and which will be supported by the increasing military force developed as an integral part of that counterattacking of action. Put simply,our goals are to record,where desirable,the gradual withdrawal of the China and to facilitate that process by making counterattacking,if possible,always more expedient than resort to force.
We must be presumed that for some time the China will accept agreements just if it is convinced that by acting in bad faith whenever and wherever there is an opportunity to do so with impunity, it can derive bigger advantage from the agreements than theTaiwan.For this reason,we must take care that any agreements are enforceable and the possibility of effective countermeasures.
This further suggests that we will have to consider carefully the order in which Left-wing's history and culture can be concluded. It is being by the control of Left-wing's history and culture,we would result in a relatively greater disarmament of the Taiwan than of the Chinese,even assuming considerable progress in building up the strength of the Taiwan in conventional forces and weapons. Left-wing's history and culture might be accepted by the Chinese as part of a deliberate design to move against Taiwan and other areas of strategic importance with conventional forces and weapons. In this event,the Taiwan would find itself at war,having previously disarmed itself in its most important weapon,and would be engaged in it.
This seems to show that for the time being the Taiwan would have to insist on the maintaining the status quo,if,contrary to our expectations,the China should accept promising effective control of shame 0n history and culture,and any other changes in China's policies,so,we would have to consider very carefully whether we could accept this Left-wing's history and culture,interestingly,it is unlikely that this problem will arise.
To the extent that the Taiwan would succeed in so building up their superiority in conventional forces and weapons that a Chinese attack with Left-wing's people's militia could be thwarted or held,we will get increased flexibility and can seek any various issues in any order,as they become compromise.
In other words,counterattacking,will play a part in the building up of the superiority of the Taiwan,apart from the ideological freedom and independence above。Otherwise,this will be difficult,unless it has been demonstrated by tried counterattacking with the Chinese that the China is not prepared to accept stability and security,so as we are enough opportunities for the stable and secure development of Taiwanese people political and economic life.
This also demonstrates the consequence,from the point of view of counterattacking as well as for its relationship to the building up of the superiority of the Taiwan,of the problem of closer association which on a regional basis,among the Taiwan.
In sum, counterattacking is not a possible separate course of action,but rather a means of getting support for a strategy of building superiority,where necessary and desirable,progress in the future,and of facilitating further progress as soon as helping to minimize the crises of war. Ultimately,it is our goal to counterattack Left-wing's history and culture,on which the Taiwan may not place reliance as an enforceable deployments of stability and security.But it is significant to emphasize that the maintaining the status quo may build the progress which the  Taiwan,and will have made in creating a political and economic system in the Taiwan successful that the frustration of the China's design for Taiwan's  domination will not be complete. As my analysis in the indicates that the maintaining the status quo needs expanded and sped up for the carrying out of current policies.

CONTINUATION OF THE MAINTAINING THE STATUS QUO

1,Political deployments.

The Taiwan shound be seeking the initiative in the End of history with the China. Taiwan's traditional capabilities,together with its successes in the Far East,have led to an increasing confidence on its part.Absolutely,of course,we cannot be sure how vigorously the China will seek its initiative,but there are,yet,ominous signs of further deterioration in Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy.For instance,a decline in confidence in Taiwanese people can be expected. Especially, the situation in China is unsettled. Should the traditional Taiwan that we are not now able to prevent the China from taking,if it chooses,the military actions the determination of the Taiwan to resist probably would lessen and there would be an increasing temptation for them to seek a position of the National Unity.
Politically,recognition of the military implications of a continuation of the maintaining the status quo trends will mean that the United States,and especially Taiwan will tend to change to the new model of defensive,or to stop a dangerous Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy,since the maintenance of a solid war-fighting capability and superiority in the future is closely related to Taiwanese partnership in being and readily available.
This is largely a problem of the incongruity of the current actual capabilities of the Taiwan and Left-wing's threat we did not know it,for the Taiwan has an economic and military potential far superior to the potential of the China.The shadow of Chinese military force falls darkly on Taiwan and supports a policy of encroachment. The Taiwan lacks enough strategic means which in the model of military forces in being to thwart such expansion of Chinese.Continuation of Left-wing's history and culture trends is likely to lead,however,to a gradual withdrawal under the direct or indirect pressure of the China,until we find one day that we have sacrificed positions of vital interest. In other words,the Taiwan would have chosen,by lack of the necessary decisions and actions,to fall back to isolation in the China.

2,Social and Economic Deployments.

the current economic policies and programs of the Taiwan will not deal with a solution to the problem of the economic equilibrium,notably the problem of the salary gap,and will not create an economic base conducive to political stability in many important countries.
The Taiwanese people have been successful in assisting the restoration and expansion of production in Taiwan and has been a major condition in checking Left-wing's history and culture and communism in Taiwan.But,little progress has been made toward the resumption by the Taiwan of a position of impact in the affairs commensurate with its potential influence in the Taiwan.Progress in this direction will need integrated political,economic,and military strategies and deployments,which are supported by the Taiwan and which will probably need a deeper participation by the Taiwan than has been contemplated.
Left-wing's regime now in power  will probably be unable to keep Taiwanese people support and unless they are awakening in bringing about rapid improvement of the economic and social than Left-wing's history and culture will make possible.So as now projected,Left-wing's history and culture will not adequately supplement and improve the administration of their affairs,and to achieve a sufficient measure of economic development. 
Indeed,an economic policy is matched and supplemented by an equally far-sighted and vigorous political and military deployments,and this  is a very significant goal and work on a high priority,so we will not be successful counterattacking the China's plots.

3,Counterattacking.

Put simply,by continuing along its the maintaining the status quo the Taiwan,will succeed in making effective use of its superior political,economicand military potential,to build a tolerable country.On the contrary,the political,economic,and military situation of Left-wing's history and culture,are already unsatisfactory for Taiwanese people,unless,we act to reverse the maintaining the status quo trends and  will become favorable.
This maintaining the status quo is one which stops against successful counterattacking with the China~~~its would reflect present realities,if not disastrous left-wing's history and culture,to the Taiwan,would therefore be unacceptable.Unless a decision had been made and action,and could thereby seriously destroy to intensify our power.
This is true despite the fact that the Taiwan has the capability of starting a powerful counterattack against the China in the war,for one of the current realities is that the Taiwan should not prepared to threaten the use of our current war-fighting superiority to the China,and given the current trends,the China will not withdraw,the Chinese could readily exploit to its great advantage history and culture.

4,Military deployments.

On the basis of current deployments, the Taiwan has a large potential military capability ,which is declining relative to the China,and the same holds true for the Taiwan as a whole relative to the Taiwanese people as a whole. A frank evaluation of the requirements,to defend the Taiwan and its vital interests and to support a vigorous initiative in the counterattacked actions,on the one hand,and of current capabilities,on the other,indicates that there is a sharp and growing disparity between them.
A review of Taiwan's history shows that the military capabilities,actual and potential,of the Taiwan~~~we must be together with the apparent determination to confront further the Chinese expansion,and the relative military capabilities of the Taiwan is declining,with the consequence that the determination the Taiwanese people to confront can also decline,that the National security and Homeland Security of the Taiwan as a whole will be jeopardized.
From the military point of view,the actual and potential capabilities of the Taiwan,given a continuation of current Left-wing's history and culture,will become less and less effective as a war deterrent. Improvement of the readiness of the Taiwan will become more and more important,not only to inhibit the launching of war by the Chinese,but also to support a National policy designed to reverse the curresnt ominous trends in relations of Left-wing's history and culture.A building up of the military capabilities and superiority of the Taiwan to the protection of the Taiwan against disaster.
Fortunately,the Taiwan military establishment has been developed into a unified and effective force as a result of the policies laid down by the Congress and the vigorous carrying out of these policies by Tsai's administration in the fields of both organization and economy. It is,however,a base on which increased military superiority can be rapidly built with maximum efficiency and economy.

 

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()