07062019.jpg

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~踢掉左邊模式,台灣走向右邊自由。】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
台灣總統 蔡英文之首席真命天子

7TH,JULY,2019
 

踢掉左翼模式,台灣走向右翼自由。
左翼歷史與文化危機與台灣,現在,顯然迫在眉睫,這種激烈的對抗與入侵越南的方式相比,最後通牒,需要對台灣的行為進行必要的改變,以及台灣的軍事姿態。
但這是一個更為深刻的故事,一個來自越南關於台灣人自由的案例 - 國家選擇,左翼的歷史和文化的過程是致命的缺陷。
從表面上看,與中共統一的道路,似乎反映了激烈的爭論,但這種明顯的活動,掩蓋了台灣人對話嚴謹的嚴重限制。
台灣政府內部,關於左翼歷史和文化的爭論,經濟的謊言是狹隘和不完整的,所以,我的經歷證實了一個驚人的事實:中華民國政府從未召開過會議,討論左轉是否真的是一個好主意。
因為台灣官員從來沒有遇到過最大的問題,左翼歷史和文化在多大程度上與經濟的關係是合理的,以及可能的成本是多少,他們被一個強大的,最終是,悲劇性,確定性,虛假假設,歷史和文化熱情的組合,在某些情況下是憤世嫉俗的意識。
左翼歷史和文化回想起來似乎很荒謬,他們逃過了仔細的分析,或者,反對意見被拋到了一邊,很少引起人們的注意。
在過去的台灣政府,幾乎沒有任何公開的,深入的分析,研究潛在性質,成本或危機的左翼歷史和文化,謊話經濟學是入侵台灣。
理所當然,在民主制度中,在行政部門之外,進行制衡是為了預防有缺陷的決策制定。 但是,左翼歷史和文化的情況,清楚地表明了對它們的審議,現在,很大程度上,不起作用,關於左翼歷史和文化的公開辯論,甚至,不如政府內部,那麼有實質性。
台灣立法委員很少提出棘手的問題,結果,更像是一股洶湧的浪潮,而不是一個明智的判斷過程。
這個國家 - 台灣,已經陷入荒謬,一場幾乎沒有人理解的選舉性戰爭。
如果左翼的歷史和文化現在看起來似乎難以理解,那麼問問自己,如果中國明天與台灣發生戰爭,它會是什麼樣子?這會是什麼樣的戰爭?
實際上,很少有人會開始回答有關預期衝突的基本問題。 台灣的目標是什麼? 台灣的軍隊能否實現預期的目標? 中國可能會如何反應? 一場戰爭持續多久,又會花多少錢?美國和日本會參與其中,如果是這樣的話,怎麼辦?
很困難找出,今天,甚至提出這些問題的人,沒有說服力的答案,對左翼歷史和文化的任何選擇都將一無是處,當台灣選擇左翼的歷史和文化時,即使美國,或其他夥伴,沒有受到攻擊,台灣也決定開始或進入衝突, 但沒有一個國家願意接近歷史和文化的衝突。
從戰略意義上講,這種情況,並不是什麼新鮮事,左翼歷史和文化的感覺,助長了民族主義的冒險,而中華帝國擁有了戰爭的力量,所以,看起來,勢在必行的威脅證明了一類下意識的反應。
在一個好戰的左翼中國人的時代,對台灣使用武力的激烈反應的危險,已經變得非常大。
即使是反對二級力量的經濟謊言,現在,也可能是毀滅性的。
左翼歷史和文化的軍事冒險也變得不可原諒。
現在是時候,讓台灣重新考慮,它決定踢開左翼歷史和選擇文化的方式,作為一個起點,台灣人可以更好地履行對國家的義務,並對潛在的左翼歷史和文化,經濟的謊言,進行嚴格的調查分析。
右翼台灣人巨大的力量,然後,搭變出即將結束~~~現在是時候,重新思考,台灣如何決定,踢出左翼的歷史和文化,選擇經濟的謊言。現在,還不會太晚。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

06272019.jpg

【kicking out of the Left-wing's model Taiwan goes to Right-side's freedom.】 

kicking out of the Left-wing's model Taiwan goes to Right-side's freedom.
The crisis of Left-wing's history and culture with Taiwan is now clearly imminent.This intensifying confrontation has been compared to the way of invasion with Vietnam,with ultimatums needs for essential changes in Taiwan's behavior,and Taiwan's military posturing.
But it is a much more profound story a case of the Vietnam send about Taiwanese people freedom today - the process of National deliberation for Left-wing's history and culture of choice is fatally flawed.
On the surface,the road to unity with CCP seemed to reflect intense debate,but this apparent activity hid ruinous limitations in the rigor of the Taiwanese people dialogue.
Inside Taiwan's government,the debate over Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy were narrow and incomplete. So my experiences confirmed a stunning fact: the administration of the Republic of China never convened session to discuss whether going to Left-turn was actually a good idea.
Because Taiwan's officials never confronted the biggest questions,to what degree Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy were justified,and what its likely costs could be.They were carried forward by a potent,and ultimately tragic,combination of certainty,false assumptions,enthusiasm of history and culture,and in some cases a crushing in cynical sense.
Left-wing's history and culture that in retrospect seem ridiculous,and they escaped careful analysis,or dissenting views were brushed aside and seldom brought to the attention.
During the past of Taiwan administration,almost no public,in-depth analyses examined the potential character,costs,or crises of Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy invasion of Taiwan.
Absolutely,of courde,in a democracy,checks and balances outside the executive branch are supposed to prevent against defective decision-making. But the case of Left-wing's history and culture makes clear that the deliberation for them,which is now largely inoperative. The public debate over Left-wing's history and culture were even less substantive than the inside the administration.
Few members of Congressal of Taiwan asked tough questions,so that the result was more like an onrushing tidal wave than a process of informed judgment.
The country - Taiwan,had thrown itself into ridiculous,an elective war that just about no one understood.
If Left-wing's history and culture now seem incomprehensible now,ask yourself,if the China did tumble into war with Taiwan tomorrow,what would it look like? 
What sort of war would it be?
Indeed,few people might start to answer basic questions about a prospective conflict. What would be the Taiwan's goal? Can Taiwan's military force achieve the desired goals? How would China likely react? How long might a war last,and what would it cost?Would United States and Japan get involved,and if so how?
It is hard to identify anyone who today is even asking these questions. Without persuasive answers,any choice for Left-wing's history and culture will be nothing.When the Taiwan chooses Left-wing's history and culture,then it decides to start or enter a conflict,even when the United States orour partners have not been attacked,and none of countries would like close to the conflict of history and culture.
In one strategic sense,this situation is nothing new. A sense of Left-wing's history and culture fuel Na adventures of the Nationalism,and an imperial China has owned the war-making power,so threats that seem imperative justify a knee-jerk response.
In an era of bellicose Left-wing's Chinese,the dangers of fierce responses to a Taiwan use of force have become so big.
Even lies of economy against secondary powers could now be devastating. 
Left-wing's history and culture of military adventures have also become inexcusable. 
It is time for the Taiwan to reconsider the way it decides on kicking out of Left-wing's history and culture of choice. As a starting point。the Taiwanese people may better fulfill its obligation to the nation and undertake rigorous investigative analyses of potential Left-wing's history and culture,lies of economy. 
The Right-side's Taiwanese people vast power,then, free pass is coming to an end~~~it is time to rethink how Taiwan makes the decision to kicking out of Left-wing's history and culture,lie of economy of choic,before it is too late. 

 

台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()