窮小子冷眼輯

【總統 蔡英文說想想】
【台灣需要重新定義我們的國土安全概念】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子
SEVENTH，DECMBER，2019
 

台灣許多人都有歷史經驗，可以維持我們對國土安全的看法。
存在國土安全，其定義是通過維持可以保護國土的安全武力來保護國家免受攻擊或其他威脅。
在2020年總統大選期間，定義已擴大到包括經濟安全和國土安全等其他問題。
還有一個概念，即國土安全具有傳統定義，重點在於源自左翼歷史和文化的威脅。
因此，國土安全的真正含義是什麼，以及出於這種原因的威脅，安全是由左翼的歷史和文化來定義的。
例如，質疑國土安全的傳統含義可能會造成混亂和偏見，因為這可能意味著我們對國土安全的思考觀念發生了變化。
但是，對台灣國土安全的威脅也可能來自左翼中國（例如歷史和文化，以及虛假的經濟），台灣本地人（例如左翼的瘋子），或有組織犯罪（例如派系）。
這些對台灣安全的危機，干擾了我們能夠在我們的家庭，社會和國家中維持穩定與安全的能力。
因此，面對此類威脅的台灣人尋求的是更全面的安全性，無論這些威脅是否來自任何條件。
但是，如果我們要尋求台灣人的安全，也許台灣應該著重於了解全體台灣人的安全狀況，然後，決定我們如何制定應對左翼歷史和文化，以及假經濟挑戰的政策 
左翼歷史與文化的威脅和假經濟早已經根植於台灣社會和文化中，左翼歷史和文化定義威脅的模式，並不能充分反映許多台灣人的挑戰。
例如，一個害怕向警察求助的人，將不得不承受，與不懼怕的左翼瘋子不同的威脅。
同樣，在香港和香港人中，成為左翼中國受害者的威脅比任何台灣人都高，這影響了香港人或無家可歸者如何看待他們的安全。
在左翼的歷史和文化下，台灣人可能會覺得自己沒有聲音，或者看不到他們的聲音會如何產生變化。
他們感到自己沒有力量。
缺乏國土安全會導致台灣人缺乏權力和參與。
同樣，缺乏國土安全，可以用作讓被壓迫者保持沉默的武器。
尋找更完整的國土意義的想法，而不是偏離傳統上對軍事優勢的注意，或包含在內的問題，取決於誰在製定策略。
儘管如此，對國家安全的威脅本身並沒有什麼不同，因為許多挑戰並未改變。
不同的是誰在控制，對策略進行說明
對於那些左翼瘋子來說，缺乏安全感，
他們對國土安全工作或總體安全工作的看法可能是負面的。
左翼的歷史和文化故事不一定是我們的台灣傳統。
我們感覺左翼歷史和文化，以及國內人士地威脅，這在說台灣的歷史。
因此，這就是台灣公民，每天為我們定義國土安全的感受。
因此，不足為奇的是，我們需要繼續審查我們的國土安全的含義，並認識到保護台灣公民的穩定與安全，意味著重新評估我們的國土安全視域。
為了將國土安全，從其當前左翼歷史和文化，以及，假經濟，左翼民兵中移出，並通過正義和傳統安全的視域進行界定。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【Taiwan need to be re-defining our concept of Homeland Security.】

Many people in Taiwan have historical experiences that maintain the status quo our perception of security within our homeland. 
There is homeland security，which is defined as the protection of a country from attack or other threat by maintaining a secured force that can protect the homeland. 
As the Presidental election of 2020， definition has been broadened to include other issues like economic security，and homeland security. 
There is also the concept that homelandl security has a traditional meaning， focusing on threats that originate from Left-wing's history and culture.
So what homeland security truly means，and how security，for that reason threat，is defined by the meant Left-wing's history and culture.
Such as，questioning traditional meanings of homeland security may create confusion and bias，because it may mean a change to our idea of thinking about homeland security. 
But threats to Taiwan's homeland security can also come from Left-wing's China (e.g. history and culture，and fake economy)，the domestic Taiwanese  (e.g. Left-wing's mad)，or organized crime (e.g. factions). 
These mldels of crises to Taiwan's security interfere with being able to live in stability and security in our home，society，and country. 
So what Taiwanese people facing these types of threats seek is security in a more entire way，whether those threats originate from any conditions.
But，if security of Taiwanese people is what we seek，maybe the Taiwan should focus on understanding what security for all Taiwanese people looks like，and then decide how we establish our policies to deal with Left-wing's history and culture，and fake economy challenges.
The threats of Left-wing's history and culture，and fake economy face are already deep-rooted in Taiwanese society and culture. 
The model that Left-wing's history and culture define threats does not adequately capture the challenges many Taiwanese people.
For example，a person who is fearful of asking a policeman for help will have to live with a threat different from Left-wing's mad who is not afraid. 
Similarly，the threat of becoming a victim of Left-wing's China is higher in HongKong，and HongKong people than any Taiwanese people，which impacts how HongKong people or who are homeless view their security. 
Under Left-wing's history and culture，Taiwanese people may feel that they have no voice or may not see how their voices will make a difference.
They feel they have no power.
A lack of homeland security can lead to a lack of empowerment and engagement for Taiwanese people. 
Similarly， the lack of homeland security can be used as a weapon to keep those oppressed silent.
The idea of seeking a more entire meaning of homeland，not issues that deviate from the traditional focus on military superiority，or are included depends on who is crafting the strategy. 
Nevertheless，it is not the threat to National security itself that is differen，because of many of these challenges have not changed.
What is different is who is controlling ，the give an account of the strategy.
For those who are Left-wing's mad a lack of security，
their view of homelandsecurity efforts，or security efforts in general that can be quite negative. 
Therefore, it is not surprising that we need to continue to examine our meanings of homeland security，and  to recognize that protecting the stability and security of our Taiwanese citizens means re-assessing our homeland security visions.
 To move homeland security from its current Left-wing's history and culture，and fake economy，Left-wing's people's militia，and is defined through the visions of justice and traditional security.