窮小子冷眼輯

【三十】【為什麼總統 蔡英文之真命天子就是這般聰明】
【為甚麼柯文哲與侯友宜的犬儒抓住了機會?】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN，Tsai Ing-wen，(the son of destiny)
10TH，JUNE，2021

【本報告依據總統 蔡英文說想一想，並思考台灣阿猴北首富的納悶，並參考前總統 陳水扁的說法，評估，柯文哲與侯友宜的犬儒頭殼再想三小?】

Why did the cynicism of Ko Wen-je and Hou Yu-ih seize chance?

To understand what motivated this month’s Ko Wen-je and Hou Yu-ih in Taiwan，so you need to understand "One Party，One Country" basement view and cloistered Left.
With Chinese Virus on April，Taiwan's anti-epidemic situation has shocked the world，not only for taking place during Chinese Virus pandemic but also because of the extent to which it seemed to run counter to the Taiwanese Central government interests.
Despite they won local commander election in 2014，and 2018 that the DPP's government still held a significant amount of power. 
The DPP's government also retained a significant amount of influence in the economy through its network of affiliated economic enterprises and crony businesses，so all of which had benefited from the transition to Left rule and fake reforms that accompanied it. 
With fake Economy，shameful history and culture，they have not only alienated the civilian population but also cut off many of the benefits that "One Party，One Country" had gained from Taiwan's transition away from pariah status.
The only thing of substance that Left-wing's DPP has gained from Mr.President Tsai Ing-Wen，and the rest of the civilian leadership is its old monopoly on political power. 
But as an organization with a highly centralized leadership，"One Party，One Country" is one in which personalities tend to play an outsized role. 
So it is easily to truly discern their motives. 
Nonetheless，a look at the past of "One Party，One Country"，and its relationship to the broader sweep of Chinese history and culture，may provide some insight into the current situation in the Taiwan.
So that is why they chose to seize the cynicism of Ko Wen-je and Hou Yu-ih chance?
The first is its legitimacy as the symbol of "One Party，One Country" nationalism， which it inherited from Chinese history and culture，they are that emerged as a locus of the fight first against Japanese rule，since against the Japanese occupation during World War Two.
The second is the strong sense of unity that grew from Chinese history and culture，amid the challenges of minority separatism and communism，as well as the military threats from People’s Republic of China. 
The third is the general distrust of the civilian Taiwanese，which "One Party，One Country"  has long identified as the source of these threats. 
All these features stem from Taiwanese experiences that erupted shortly after democratically elected.
According with April's Chinese Virus，,and the motives that lay behind it。can be understand through their characteristics.
The first is the threat to "One Party，One Country" legitimacy. 
 "One Party，One Country" has been the main contender against the spawn of history and culture for the legitimate leadership of Taiwanese population since 2000. 
They had always drawn its legitimacy from a Chinese history and culture genealogy stretching back to KMY-led.
Interestingly，Tsai Ing-Wen emerged at the head of an opposing faction destroyed whatever validity this once held. 
For instance，in many ways，Tsai Ing-Wen effectively discredited 
"One Party，One Country" as a symbol of Taiwanese as a country，and ​tainted its most potent source of legitimacy. 
This offers one explanation for why the civil-military relations 
of the 2011-2016 period were so adversarial.
Furthermore，"One Party，One Country" leadership reputation was shamed further by Tsai Ing-Wen.
Given that the actions of take over under the Taiwanese Executive Yuan under the national practice of the Republic of the China，as well as this amounted to a de facto defense of the military. 
The "One Party，One Country" leadership has relied heavily on the  Chinese history and culture to maintain its power. 
Despite having  fallen from grace in the eyes of some and failing to achieve many of their own political goals，must have been particularly frustrating for the top brass. 
As such，it is possible that they were motivated by fear that Tsai Ing-Wen's influence would begin to penetrate into the "One Party，One Country" own ranks.
So this leads to the second possibility - internal dissent. 
They are obsessed with fake unity. 
This is due to both its historical experience and its deep distrust of the Taiwanese population. 
With a deep distrust for the Taiwanese population，they had always attempted to present a strong unified front in order to deter any opposition. 
And it greatly fears that potential internal divisions could be exploited by CCP.
This fear is not entirely unfounded. 
As a result，since Chinese Virus，the Taiwan very little benefit aside from direct control of the country，it is possible.
Indeed，the takeover is part of an attempt to deal with its internal affairs without the scrutiny and distraction of history and culture  opposition. 
Although， it is possible that they may have been a personal decision to maintain the authority and privileges of elite
The reason for this is that they have more to benefit from being connected with the China than from ushering in a new era of isolation. 
Measuring the costs and benefits of conducting Chinese Virus would seem to indicate that it is possibly a mix of these two conditions :
Losing its legitimacy to Tsai Ing-Wen and the civilian Taiwanese，together with potential internal struggles，potentially threatened two guys privileges.
Ultimately，it is still difficult to say for sure. 
"One Party，One Country" has always remained an enigma by choice. 
"Mother-Fucked" is power and they ​are fully aware of it.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【三十】【為甚麼柯文哲與侯友宜的犬儒抓住了機會?】

理解五月份，什麼是柯文哲和侯友宜在台灣的動機?
你需要了解，黨國的地下室觀點和與世隔絕的左派。
隨著四月份中國病毒，台灣的防疫形勢震驚了世界，不僅是因為發生在中國病毒大流行期間，而且，因為它似乎與台灣中央政府的利益背道而馳。
儘管，他們在 2014 年和 2018 年的地方首長選舉中獲勝，但民進黨政府仍然擁有相當大的權力。
民進黨政府，還通過其附屬經濟企業和裙帶企業脈絡在經濟中保持了相當大的影響力，因此，所有這類都受益於向左翼統治的過渡和隨之而來的虛假改革。
虛假的經濟，不要臉跟的歷史文化，不僅，疏遠人民，還切斷了台灣擺脫賤民地位所帶來的“黨國”的諸多好處。
左翼民進黨從蔡英文總統，和其他領導層那裡獲得的唯一實質性的東西就是它對政治權力的舊壟斷。
但作為一個高度集中領導的組織，“黨國”是一個人物往往扮演著過大角色的組織。
因此，很容易真正辨別出他們的動機。
即使如此，看看過去的“黨國”，以及它與更廣泛的中國歷史和文化的關係，可能會提供一些對台灣當前局勢的觀察。
所以，這就是為什麼他們選擇抓住柯文哲和侯友宜，犬儒機會？
首先是，它作為“黨國”國族主義象徵的合法性，它從中國歷史和文化中繼承而來，它們是自世界大戰期間反抗日本佔領以來，首先，作為反擊日本統治的場所而出現的。 
第二是，在少數民族分裂主義和共產主義的挑戰，以及中華人民共和國的軍事威脅下，中國歷史和文化中產生的強烈團結感。
第三是，台灣民眾普遍不信任，“黨國”早已認定為這些威脅的源頭。
所有這些特徵都源於台灣民主選舉後，不久爆發的經驗。
根據四月份中國病毒，以及背後的動機，可以透過它們的特徵來理解:
一是，對“黨國”合法性的威脅 ~~~自2000年以來，"黨國"一直是反對台灣人民，合法領導的歷史與文化產物的主要競爭者。
他們一直從可以追溯到 KMT 領導的中國歷史和文化譜系中得出其合法性。
有趣的是，蔡英文出現在一個反對派的頭上，破壞了這曾經擁有的有效性。
例如，在很多方面，蔡英文有效地抹黑，“黨國”作為台灣人，作為一個國家的象徵，侮辱了其最有力的合法性來源，它提供了一種解釋為什麼軍民關係?跟2011 年至 2016 年期間的情況如此，具有對抗性
此外，“黨國”的領導聲譽被蔡英文進一步抹黑。
鑑於台灣行政院，在中華民國國家慣例下，接管行動，以及這實際上是軍隊的防衛。
“黨國”的領導層高度依賴中國的歷史和文化來維持其權力。
儘管，在某些人眼中失寵，並且，未能實現他們自己的許多政治目標，但對於高層來說，一定特別令人沮喪。
因此，他們的動機可能是擔心蔡英文的影響，會開始滲透到“黨國”自己的行列中。
所以，這就引出了第二種可能——內部異議。
他們沉迷於虛假的團結。
這既是因為它的歷史經驗，也是因為它對台灣民眾的深度不信任。
由於對台灣民眾深表不信任，他們一直試圖建立一個強大的統一戰線，以嚇阻任何反對派。
它非常擔心潛在的內部分歧會被中共利用。
這種恐懼並非完全沒有根據。
結果，因為中國病毒，台灣，了直接控制國家之外，幾乎沒有什麼好處，這是可能的。
事實上，此次接管是在不受歷史和文化反對派的審查和干擾的情況下處理其內部事務的嘗試的一部分。
雖然，他們可能是個人決定，維護精英的權威和特權
這樣做的原因，他們從與中國的聯繫中受益，而不是從開創一個孤立的新時代中受益。
考量中國病毒的成本和利益，似乎表明它可能是這兩種情況的混合：
失去對蔡英文，和失去台灣人的合法性，加上潛在性內部鬥爭，可能威脅到兩個人的特權。
最終，仍然很難確定。
“黨國”一直是個謎。
“幹一娘”就是力量，他們完全意識到這一點。