窮小子冷眼輯

蔡英文說想想:未來台灣羊群的戰術主義

(二)

蔡英文說想想:未來台灣羊群的戰術主義(一) 

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MAY 26 2014

引述來自:
一,台灣民間人士:台灣小站老闆蔡先生說：羊群；
二,臺大醫院醫師:柯文哲先生說：死狗；
三,中華民國國防大學教授洪榮一先生說：台灣風格；
本戰術主義研究報告樂意報告給蔡英文女士
本研究報告所表達的結論和建議，僅是台灣窮小子個人，並不反映他們

Chapter 2
TAIWAN'S FLOCK BACKGROUND
THE HISTORY-ISM DOCTRINE PROCESS

According with the development of history-ism doctrine has unfolded over the years into a just bureaucratism,not a formal doctrine.
Thus,formal doctrine will provide specific doctrine, and war-fighting procedures,in which,in order to establish a inter-operability of doctrinal system,in particular,Joint Operations Doctrine of new model of Taiwan's flock,rather than age-old of history and culture.
In other words,new model of Taiwan's flock will support,and be employed mainly in a tactical and strategic operastion-role,as is now beginning to recognize a biggest role for Taiwan's flock force.
In crisis,Taiwan's flock tactical doctrine adequately described the future of Taiwan's power,rather than,age-old of history and culture.
Prior to 1990,Taiwan's flock power depended solely on history and culture doctrines.
Nonetheless,when Nation adopted the tactics of flexible response,need increased for power,in which,in order to integrate effectively together.Ending of history is to develop jointed tactical doctrine and war-fighting common procedures.This is global trend,rather than,age-old of history and culture.
The age-old of history and culture change process is slow which doctrine has yet to undergo changes required to reflect global environment realities.
But Taiwan's flock doctrinal change is thus an iterative,ending of history process, and alterations have been relatively history and culture in range.
Joint doctrines and principles of Taiwan's flock common positions which its determining to new era of Taiwanese Ending of history.
Final on doctrinal change will be affected by conventional National political,economic,and military capabilities,if we will not be ending of history,in turn limiting Taiwanese war-fighting capability and superiority.
Unless,Taiwanese must take Ending of history war-fighting action to streamline the doctrinal Taiwan's flock revision process.

OUT-OF-THE-AGE-OLD OF MYTH MATIONAL TASKS

To look back in history,the surprising events of 2014 and 1990s' caused us to re-assess its task.
After much controversy "BIG WORDS" are still "BIG WORDS" which determined that it would put more insistence on texts,and political deployment of rather than its economic and military means.
History and culture have always vowed that we would still have an important "BIG WORDS" role to play,and would also provide stability and security across  the Chinese people.
To do this, we would have to be capable war-fighting of "BIG WORDS" to operate more "BIG WORDS".
So,the challenge current and future we will be keep and own new model of sufficiently war-fihgting capability to maintain stability security within Taiwan's homeland elsewhere,in which,in order to serve as the primary security force for all of Taiwan.
While age-old of history and cultrue were involved in a very limited war-fighting model,but Taiwanese inherent independent,free war0fighting-experience would prove extremely helpful in environment of the future.
The conventional history and culture lesson for actually is that there was an increasing need to be prepared - reservation and deployment of the Taiwan's flock.
They are indicative of the new model and era of Ending of history forces and especially the conventional history and culture power,in current and future of National and Homeland security environment.
In technological operations, flock has proven to be the only Taiwan's war-fighting system capable of taking effective National political,economic,and military war-fighting action,in order to counterattack history-culture violence extremism and terrorism in tactical response.
In turn,National stability has no the war-fighting ability like age-old of history and culture.
In other words,with no security Ending of history,the age-old of history and culture is incapable of decisive action,which does not have the war-fighting capability and superiority to enforce National strategic and political deployments.
As our Nation-Taiwan must push and foster new model of flock,Taiwan will continue to own framework of choice for the near future,security and stability will increasingly become involved in our Homeland.
Taiwan's flock tactical doctrine force must adapt to pragmatism and realism in the future.

TAIWAN'S FLOCK FORCE ENLARGEMENT

Taiwan's flock will be immensely affect the R.O.C. National core tactics,so we are necessitating immediate modifications to specific procedures,in which,in order to intensify security and stability,cooperation,and good partnership ,as well as a solid common defense.
The purpose of the Taiwan's flock is also to provide National military reform,intensify  legal institutions,respect independence and freedom,and through deterrent action to drive security and stability.
Eventual mission will be promoted war-fighting action to immediate participation,and providing timely encouragement to solve the applicability of the tactical doctrine.
While it will show a consider swelling-process,and this also explain a National Commitment to independence and freedom which demonstrate National internal stability to defense.In turn,National consensus.
However,age-old of history and culture agreed that would increase the influence of independence and freedom and discredit the ancestral tablet.Thus, Taiwan's flock offered tactical doctrine to push National stability and democracy.
Precedence-deployment does exist,and provided Taiwan's flock against Taiwan's desires.
Resolution of disputes has also not been a deterrent to the position of history and culture in the past.
Thus, it must accept new members of Taiwanese,in turn,who are not capable of defending the Taiwan,and who own war-fighting capability and competitive superiority.
As tactical doctrine signs Taiwan's framework,and committing them to the basic principles of common security.In other words,there is some for alternate relations will affect Taiwan's strategy and war-fighting doctrine,and are made in accordance with specific basic principles,and than,develop a unique relationship with Nation.
The Taiwan's flock force integration into new model of tactical doctrine that possess diverse war-fighting force and superiority with Taiwan.

CONCLUSION:

The age-old of hisotry and culture should not present,and future Taiwan needs new tactical doctrine.
The far from implementing bwtween the principles of National economic liberalism and age-old of hisotry and culture.And facing the near future,Taiwan's flock participation that our Nation-Taiwan will require some thought.
And most importantly,we must realize,and strongly desire to translates into more security-commitment.
After all,history and culture are similarly struggling with changes,and they do have many lingering predicaments.In particular,Taiwan's geopolitical strategic location relative to also presents a special challenge.
So,we should be considered separately due to Taiwanese potential and history-culture threat.
We must carefully consider the establishment of new model of Taiwan's flock tactical force in Taiwan to avoid encouraging Taiwanese insecurities which will have disadvantageous consequences on Taiwan's stability.
In summary, new model of Taiwan's flock tactical force will occur change in the next few years.
Future Taiwan's flock tactical doctrine must reflect the pragmatism and realism.
Taiwan must be proactive, dealing with history and culture issues.

第二章-問題背景:台灣羊群的背景
歷史主義的進程

端視歷史主義的發展，多年以來，僅是一個官僚主義，不算是正式學理；
因此．正式學理將提供具體學理與作戰程序．以建立一個可相互操作性的學理系統．特別是．新模式台灣羊群聯合作戰學理．而不是古老的歷史與文化！
換句話說，新模式台灣羊群力量將支持與主要應用在戰術與戰略操作作用；
是以，現在開始，認識到台灣羊群力量，發揮更大的作用！
台灣羊群戰術主義，在危機中，充分說明未來的台灣力量學理，而不是古老的歷史與文化；
在1990年之前，台灣羊群的力量，完全依賴於歷史與文化學理！
然而，當國家需要採取靈活反應戰術，需要增加新力量，以有效地整合在一起；
終結歷史，以擬定聯合戰略學理與作戰通用程序，這是全球趨勢不，是古老的歷史與文化！
古老的歷史與文化的改變進程是緩慢的學理，尚未經過反思，全球現實環境，所需要的巨大改變；
但是，台灣羊群的學理改變是這樣一個改變，終結歷史的進程中，並修改歷史與文化的範圍；
台灣羊群的聯合作戰學理與原則的共同立場，這將取決於新世代台灣人的終結歷史！
對學理的改變，最終將影響，傳統的國家政治，經濟與軍事能力；
如果，不終結歷史，最終將導致國家成本增加，限制台灣人的作戰能力與優勢！
除非，台灣人必須採取終結歷史作戰行動，以使合理化，台灣羊群主義修訂進程！

遠離古老神話的國家使命

回顧歷史二十世紀九零年，和2014年的讓人驚異的太陽花事件，啟動，我們重新評估它的任務；
唬爛，經過反覆的爭論，還是唬爛，其決定它更注重的課文，而不是經濟與軍事手段的政治部署；
歷史與文化，總是信誓旦旦地說：我們仍然要發揮唬爛，將繼續為中華民族，提供穩定與安全的重要作用！
要做到這一點，我們必須有唬爛的作戰能力來操作更大的唬爛！
所以，我們當前與未來的挑戰是要擁有新模式足夠的作戰能力與終結歷史的戰術勢力在台灣的國土範圍內，維護穩定與安全，作為整個台灣的主要安全力量！
雖然，古老的歷史與文化的參與，一個非常有限的作戰模式，但是，台灣人與生俱來的獨立與自由的作戰經驗，將證明在未來環境中非常有用；
傳統的歷史與文化的教訓，確實是越來越需要做準備-台灣羊群的儲備與部署！
它們將預告，新模式新世代的終結歷史的力量，特別是，傳統的歷史與文化力量，在當前與未來的國家與國土安全環境；
在技術操作，羊群曾經被證明是採取有效的國家政經與軍事作戰行動的唯一台灣作戰系統，以反擊，暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義的戰術回應！
另言之，古老的歷史與文化，沒有國家穩定性作戰能力，僅是麻煩的流程；
換句話說，沒有安全的終結歷史，古老的歷史與文化是無能的決定性行動，不具備足夠的作戰能力與優勢，執行國家策略與政策部署；
是以，我們的國家-台灣，必須驅動，培養，新模式羊群台灣，將繼續擁有選擇框架，在不久的將來，安全與穩定，將越來越多地參與我們的鄉土！
台灣羊群力量必須適應未來的務實與現實！

台灣羊群力量的擴大

台灣羊群可能會極大地影響到中華民國的國家核心戰術，因此，需要立即修改特定進程，以強化，安全與穩定，合作與良好的夥伴關係，穩固共同的防衛！
台灣羊群的目標，也提供，國家軍事變革，強化法制，尊重獨立與自由，並透過嚇阻行動，驅動安全與穩定；
最終的使命，將促進作戰行動，直接參與，提供及時的鼓勵，以解決戰術主義的適用性；
雖然，會出現一個謹慎的膨脹進程，這也說明獨立與自由的國家承諾，展現國家內部穩定的防線，另言之，國家共識！
然而，古老的歷史與文化，認為提高獨立與自由的影響與丟臉神主牌；
因此，台灣羊群被提供的戰術主義，以驅動，國家穩定與民主；
優先部署確實存在，提供台灣羊群對台灣的期望！
解決爭議，並不會威嚇，過去的歷史與文化地位！
因此，它必須接受新的台灣人，另言之，誰有沒有能力防衛台灣，誰擁有作戰能力與競爭優勢？
是以．戰術主義簽署台灣框架．與提交共同安全的基本原則．換句話說．有一些替代關係．將影響台灣策略和作戰原則．並依據．具體的基本原則．而作出調整．進而發展一個獨特的國家關係！
台灣羊群的力量，融入新模式戰術主義，讓台灣擁有多樣的性的作戰力量與優勢！

結論:

古老的歷史與文化不應該存在，台灣的未來需要新的戰術主義；
古老的歷史與文化，與國家自由經濟主義的戰術原則，差距過大；
面對不久的將來，我們的國家-台灣，可能需要一些思考，台灣羊群的參與！
最重要的是我，們必須認識到，與強烈渴望，轉化為更高的安全性承諾；
畢竟，歷史與文化，也同樣受困於改變，他們有許多揮之不去的窘境；
特別是，台灣的地緣戰略位置，相對於也是一個特殊的挑戰！
所以，我們應該分開思考，由於台灣人的潛力歷史與文化的威脅；
我們必須仔細考慮，建立，新模式的台灣羊群戰術力量在台灣，以避免，可能對台灣穩定不利後果，鼓勵台灣的不安全；
總之，新模式的台灣羊群戰術力量，在未來幾年，將會發生；
未來台灣羊群戰術主義，必須反映未來的務實與現實！
台灣必須積極主動解決，歷史與文化問題！