nuclear power 1核能2  

台灣窮小子看未來核能的挑戰?

Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子 03172013

核能是值得挑戰,雖然,有許多的危機,但能夠降低風險!
傳統的能源競爭,依然是主要的作戰對象;至少,在未來,特別是,面對全球氣候改變;因為所有的能源模式都有危機與風險;是以,核能在未來環境還是強大的作戰能量!
即使在歷史經驗裡,或如:日本,畢竟,意外事件並不常見,也無從忽略相關性的核能危機;但是,災難性教訓與記憶是強化安全性參數,而不是古老的歷史與文化的涉入!
不可否認,災難性教訓與記憶是另類恐懼;但是,它可能驅動國家,繼續尋找安全,有效的,無碳與非傳統性能源;
即使是,頑固的歷史與文化,也認識到他們的部署在未來的納悶?
然而,教訓與記憶的說明,要讓民眾接受核能風險是很困難的;特別是,以頑固的歷史與文化來說服,挨罵,也是理所當然;
我們想要做到這一點,必須終結歷史,與承認當前的安全模式改正不夠;因為頑固的歷史與文化,從來不會承認錯誤;
畢竟,日本的意外事件,不過是一件特別的,難以預測的整合;終結歷史,一切也就安穩;終結歷史的能源整合策略,平衡危機與風險;
特別是,涉入安全理念;這是不相關於頑固的歷史與文化;簡單來說,災難性機率,至少,在理論上,不大;是以,無需過度擔心!
我們都知道日本很重視安全;重點是一個重要的安全機會,來自他們的安全承擔;
安全機會與承擔,強調地球運動是大於所有的能源系統的設計限制;這類是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
幸運的是,日本經驗說明是增加新的安全功能,以確保核能能夠承受,更大的自然意外事件;
問題是:相關於整個世界的能源部署,不單是,日本;尤其是,也不相關於頑固的歷史與文化!
簡單來說,我們現在所需要的是,包括,已經在運作與建設中的全球核電廠的設計基礎;特別是,仔細的安全評估;這類是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
具體來說,我們需要確定,核能是否真正有能力承擔,自然和人為災難,尤其是,面對環境恐怖主義;
因為,幾乎可以肯定的是當前的標準是足夠的;然而,頑固的歷史與文化的評估是不必要的;頑固的歷史與文化的說法是根本不可信的,換句話說,成事不足敗事有餘;
其實,國家核能工業是民眾必須要信任;最重要的,也許是,信任反應爐設計;這是科學家與工程師的努力,而不是頑固的歷史與文化!
信任確保有足夠的監督,這是不相關於古老的歷史與文化!
新的反應爐的安全性功能,幾乎能夠避免歷史重演;雖然,現在要告訴民眾是很困難!
最後這一點是很重要的;

絕對不能嘗試以頑固的歷史與文化來說服民眾,因為現在的核能工業不會犯相同的錯誤!
承認錯誤與問題並努力解決來贏得民眾的信任!

525662_10151427224374198_1874437454_n  

Although,there is more crisis,but,we can reduce risk,nuclear power is worth to challenge.
Traditional energy competitions are still war-fighting targets,at least,in the future,we will face global climate change. Because of all of energy models are having crises and risks,so,as nuclear power remains strong war-fighting power in the environment for the future.
In spite of historical experiences,such as Japan,after all, accidents are few,also,we have not ignored relative to nuclear power crisis. But,lessons and  memories of that disaster are to intensify security argument,rather than,the age-old of history and culture once were.
It cannot denied that lessons and  memories of that disaster are another fears,but,they can be driving as nation carry on  safe,effective carbon-free and non-tradition energies.
Despite that stubborn of history and culture who understand their deployments about doubts in the future?
However,the explanations of  lessons and  memories of that disaster,which make people to accept the risks of nuclear energy,that has been tough,in particular,as persuading into stubborn of history and culture,also,blames are on stand to reason.
We would like to do so,it must be ending of history,and  recognize and correct the deficiencies of current its safer model. Because of stubborn of history and culture have never  recognized about mistakes.
After all,as Japan's  accident,it was an remarkably doubtful integration ; ending of history is just fine for everything. Ending of history of energy integrative strategy is  balancing these crisis and risk.
These are not related to stubborn of history and culture,when it comes to security concept. Simply put,the probability of  disaster, at least,in theory,it was not making big,so,we did not worry so much.
We all know that Japan focus on safety,so,as point is that a significant secure opportunity comes from their secure shoulder.
Secure opportunity and  shoulder were emphasized by the  earth movements,which were larger than all energies systems design limit. And these are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Fortunately,Japan's experience has shown that new safety characteristic be increased to ensure that it was capable of resist bigger natural accidents.
The problem is relevant to the whole world,and not just Japan,also,not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Simply put,we are required now is including that those design basis already in operation and construction for all nuclear power plants worldwide,in particular,careful assessment.And these are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Specifically,we need to determine whether they are capable of bearing natural and man-made disasters,especially,they face environmental terrorism.
Because of almost certainly is that current standards are sufficient,yet,the stubborn of history and culture of reassessment is unnecessary.This argument of stubborn of history and culture are simply not credible,and in other words,they are also self-defeating.
Indeed.national nuclear power industry must be trusted by people,and most importantly perhaps,trust reactor designers.This is being strived by scientists and engineers,rather than stubborn of history and culture.
The trust is ensuring sufficient oversight,and not related to the age-old of history and culture.
New  reactors with advanced safety characteristic will almost certainly avoid the historical re-act.Although,now,it is hardly to tell people.
This final point is important that we must not try to use as stubborn of history and culture to reason people down.Because of the nuclear industry does not make the same mistake now.
We acknowledge mistakes and problems,and work hardly to solve it that win people's trust.

    文章標籤

    未來核能

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()