Copyrighted @ 台灣窮小子 03172013
Although,there is more crisis,but,we can reduce risk,nuclear power is worth to challenge.
Traditional energy competitions are still war-fighting targets,at least,in the future,we will face global climate change. Because of all of energy models are having crises and risks,so,as nuclear power remains strong war-fighting power in the environment for the future.
In spite of historical experiences,such as Japan,after all, accidents are few,also,we have not ignored relative to nuclear power crisis. But,lessons and memories of that disaster are to intensify security argument,rather than,the age-old of history and culture once were.
It cannot denied that lessons and memories of that disaster are another fears,but,they can be driving as nation carry on safe,effective carbon-free and non-tradition energies.
Despite that stubborn of history and culture who understand their deployments about doubts in the future?
However,the explanations of lessons and memories of that disaster,which make people to accept the risks of nuclear energy,that has been tough,in particular,as persuading into stubborn of history and culture,also,blames are on stand to reason.
We would like to do so,it must be ending of history,and recognize and correct the deficiencies of current its safer model. Because of stubborn of history and culture have never recognized about mistakes.
After all,as Japan's accident,it was an remarkably doubtful integration ; ending of history is just fine for everything. Ending of history of energy integrative strategy is balancing these crisis and risk.
These are not related to stubborn of history and culture,when it comes to security concept. Simply put,the probability of disaster, at least,in theory,it was not making big,so,we did not worry so much.
We all know that Japan focus on safety,so,as point is that a significant secure opportunity comes from their secure shoulder.
Secure opportunity and shoulder were emphasized by the earth movements,which were larger than all energies systems design limit. And these are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Fortunately,Japan's experience has shown that new safety characteristic be increased to ensure that it was capable of resist bigger natural accidents.
The problem is relevant to the whole world,and not just Japan,also,not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Simply put,we are required now is including that those design basis already in operation and construction for all nuclear power plants worldwide,in particular,careful assessment.And these are not related to the age-old of history and culture.
Specifically,we need to determine whether they are capable of bearing natural and man-made disasters,especially,they face environmental terrorism.
Because of almost certainly is that current standards are sufficient,yet,the stubborn of history and culture of reassessment is unnecessary.This argument of stubborn of history and culture are simply not credible,and in other words,they are also self-defeating.
Indeed.national nuclear power industry must be trusted by people,and most importantly perhaps,trust reactor designers.This is being strived by scientists and engineers,rather than stubborn of history and culture.
The trust is ensuring sufficient oversight,and not related to the age-old of history and culture.
New reactors with advanced safety characteristic will almost certainly avoid the historical re-act.Although,now,it is hardly to tell people.
This final point is important that we must not try to use as stubborn of history and culture to reason people down.Because of the nuclear industry does not make the same mistake now.
We acknowledge mistakes and problems,and work hardly to solve it that win people's trust.