IRAQI 2

美國的ISIS策略部署

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 NOV 09 2014

其實,美國總統與將軍,未必能夠完全解決,但是,美國可以執行的策略部署是:全球環境是很重要的務實與現實;另言之,美國早有策略部署;現在是,可能是一類誤判,換句話說,總統沒必要說得公開,或小心看待美國的行動;畢竟,自己的國家要自己來,伊拉克軍隊不能自歷史與文化的腐敗復原;而不是宗教力量,除非他們可以創造奇蹟;美國作戰部隊僅是驅動,協助任務,並不是執行任務;在這種情況下,伊拉克政府軍必須能夠執行反擊任務;另言之,伊拉克政府無法團結,那美國的策略部署也無法幫忙結束國家內戰!端視新政府還是不穩定,生存機會不大;畢竟,政府還是老幹,即使是庫德人,僅是小小的承諾,沒有新的重大的支持力量;是以,美國仍然面對其他伊斯蘭國家的威脅,並不能真正完全地幫助伊拉克;除非有一個真正的夥伴關係支持美國,不然,這將限制美國的承諾;

恐怖主義與極端主義的敵人是不是比美國與伊拉克的敵人還糟糕

因為美國不能直接反擊恐怖主義與極端主義的敵人;雖然聯合國已經確認是冷血殺手!所以,夥伴就意味在伊拉克,甚至,敘利亞;穩定與安全是惡夢在未來!平心而論,這是一個困境;美國總統很困難地面對它,事實上,任何妥協行動,它們不會害怕;在現實的中東世界,地面威脅到伊斯蘭國家才是有效地反擊極端勢力;舉例來說,以色列;換句話說,美國總統還沒有一個選項,提供明確,穩定機會在伊拉克;總之,美國總統不是現實的總統是,以缺乏優勢與力量來解決;美國早已經有許多現實的將軍,舉例來說,鄧普西將軍!

誰主沉浮
在決定中,力量是作戰行動的關鍵戰略在整個領導層級與部隊;以打擊敵人的政治與經濟目標!另言之,這將可能需要時間來重整與建立,新模式的情報作戰系統;雖然,目前不清楚部署等級,或是改變,讓人驚訝的未來的作戰行動;與此同時,需要夥伴,盡可能提供支援,展現果斷與強烈的力量支持伊拉克;優柔寡斷,無法承擔,與獲得支持,主要問題是策略部署與國家對宗教族群的努力!換句話說,需要高標準特種部隊,支持伊拉克政府與庫德人;並且加,入伊拉克部隊,提供戰術指導與計畫!畢竟,這是一個低標準的內戰,並不是針對伊斯蘭國家的戰爭!

重新確認誰才是夥伴?
其實,美國總統面對關鍵問題是不確定的夥伴關係;雖然,許多國家說,與美國團結,但是,只有少數國家才能部署有力的軍事力量,特別是,封鎖伊斯蘭國的經濟與款項;換句話說,可靠的夥伴能夠控制,並且有正當攻擊,破壞侵犯社會和人權的行為;可靠的夥伴能夠提供作戰基地與部隊,至少,具有高度穩定與安全象徵的宣示!

結論:
雖然有不同的策略利益,但是,美國能夠幫忙建立統一的伊拉克,並連接其他阿拉伯國家;畢竟,合作需要決定性的美國領導地位,同時,敘利亞與伊拉克政府願意改變,不然會增加美國的負擔!格外是,土耳其封鎖伊斯蘭國最重要的國家!

台灣窮小子的研讀是私人與無黨派,專注於全球問題;

所有的理念僅是與蔡英文報告,我不需要唬爛的歴史與文化

© 2014 by 台灣窮小子's studies. All rights reserved

isismgn

THE US'S STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT WITH ISIS

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 NOV 09 2014

Indeed,the U.S.President and an admiral would not be able to solve absolutely,but the United States will be executing strategic deployment:
The global environment is an important pragmatism and realism.In turn,the United States has already strategic deployment.Now,perheps it is a misjudge.In other words,the President speaks unnecessary openly,or be careful about what U.S. action.After all,Iraqi forces cannot be revival from the corruption of history and culture because they must be united to re-restore their own Nation.Rather than,religionary power,unless they can create miracle.This is just driving assistant mission for U.S. combat force,not executing mission.Under this situation,Iraqi government forces must be able to execute counterattack mission.In turn,the Iraqi government cannot be unity that the U.S. strategic deployment will not be also helping to end National civil war.According with new government is still unstable,and an opportunity will not survive.After all,new government remains age-old of framework.In spite of the Kurds have just a little commitment to supporting power with no new,and significance.As the United States still faces other threat of the Islamic countries,and cannot truthly help Iraq ; unless,there is a real partnership supporting the United States,not so,it will limit the U.S. commitment.

The foe of terrorism and extremism is stupid than the U.S.and Iraqi adversary.

Because of the U.S.cannot direct to counterattack terrorism and extremism adversary ; while the U.N.has identified that they are COLD-BLOOD KILLER.So,partners will mean nightmare of Iraqi,even Syrian stability and security in the future.Obviously.this is a dilemma that the U.S. President will be toughly to face it.In fact,they have not feared with any compromise actions.In the real the Middle East World,the ground threat to the Islamic country remains effectively to countryattack extremist forces.For instance,Israel.In other words,the U.S. President will not have a option to support clear,stable opportunity in the Iraqi,including Syria.In short,the U.S. President is not realities the President who lack of superiority and force to solve.The United States has already had many realities generals,for instance, an admiral of Martin Dempsey.

WHO DETERMINISTIC FORCE

In determining,power is forward war-fighting action of key strategy in entire leadership and force which attack adversary political and economic targes.. In turn,it will take time to re-intergrade and build new model of intelligence operation.Although,it is unclear the level of deployment,or changing astonished war-fighting action in the future.At the same time, we need partners who as much active support,and show strong and decisive force to support Iraqi.The indecision cannot shoulder,and gain support ; the major problems are strategic deployment, and nation with sectarian and racial efforts.In other words,we need high-standard special force to support Iraqi government,and work with the Kurds,in addition to join Iraqi's force to provide tactical guidance and planning.After all,it is a low-standard civil war,and this is not a war against the Islamic country.

WHO PALS WILL BE RE-IDENTIFIED ?

Indeed,the significant problem the American President faces is the uncertain partnership.While many countries have always said solidarity with the United States,but just a few countries still deploy powerful military force.In particular,to black out the Islamic State's economy and funds.In other words,reliable partners can control,and in addition to attack social and human rights destructions.And also,reliable partners can provide military bases and forces,at least,highly symbolic announces of stability and security.

Conclusion:

Although,it has fundamentally different strategic interests,but the United States will help to create unified Iraq,and linked to other Arab states.After all,cooperation needs both decisive and consistent U.S. leadership,and has proven changes in the Syria and Iraqi governments.Nonetheless, the United States will increase to assume.Especially,Turkey is critical country to black out the Islamic State.

My commentary is a private and nonpartisan ; and focusing on global issues ; all ideas are reported to Ms.Tsai Ing-wen; I do not need "BIG WORDS" of history and culture.

© 2014 by 台灣窮小子's studies. All rights reserved

    文章標籤

    美國 ISIS

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()