窮小子冷眼輯

STAND BY CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 JUN 3 2014

Over the past many decades,I have studied many China’s the People’s Liberation Army (PLA),articles and theories ;

in other wotds,China still believes that the United States is an imaginary enemy for China,

and in other words,they think that they must be stood up for that the United States attacks China.

Although,the probability of confrontation will remain as airplane's block box for PLA - despite that something that we avoid unwilled escalation,and

accidental circumstance will into unexpected conflict.

In particular,PLA speedily up expanding military budget - history and culture ambiguity which it is doubtful this will be any changes in the Pacific Ocean.

Especially,PLA enjoys operating asymmetric and puzzled tactics to deny military dialogues and communications.

For instance,U.S. arms sales to Taiwan,PLA enjoying breaks off interatcion,also therefore,leading to often worrying silence.

In other words,as a result,there has been growing distrust of history and culture thoughtful with the U.S. government.

Absolutely,of course,China is doing the same deployment ; PLA is seeking military science and strategic deployment.

Even Chinese president Xi’s new model of big-power relations,

but use as history and culture , necessitating the United States to surrender to the fact of China’s rise.

Eventually,one of the quality China has owned the asymmetry of "BIG WORDS" of history and culture.So,why will China give that up?

待命中-中國與美國

在過去的幾十年，我已經研讀許多中國人民解放軍的文誌與學理；

換句話說，中國還是相信美國是中國的假想敵；

換句話說，他們認為，他們必須待命，美國打中國！

雖然，對解放軍來說，對抗的可能性，或如航機的黑盒子；

即使，避免突如其來升級，，但是遭遇的意外狀況可能導致衝突！

特別是，解放軍加速擴大軍事預算－歷史與文化的曖昧；

可能更讓人懷疑未來在太平洋的變化！

尤其是，解放軍喜歡運用不對稱性與困惑戰術來拒絕軍事對話與溝通！

舉例來說，美國對台灣軍售，解放軍喜歡中斷交流，也因而時常導致一個認人不安全的沉默；

換句話說，歷史與文化的思想，結果是，從來不相信美國政府！

當然，中國也正在做相同的部署－解放軍追求軍事科學與策略部署！

即使是中國國家主席習近平強調新模式大國關係，但是，以歷史與文化，迫使美國屈服中國崛起的事實！

最後是，中國擁有一個優點是歷史與文化的不對稱性唬爛；

所以，為什麼中國要放棄呢?