窮小子冷眼輯

【戰術解析】-中共／白帶與厚德路策略

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MARCH 7 2015

According with injecting globe into China’s one belt, one road strategy ; is it really a new opportunity?
The PRC has started the one belt, one road strategy since 2013 , which its as a national development strategy to push actively mobilizable war-fighting in National politics and economies.
Yet , so-called the one belt, one road strategy means that "new silk road economic war-fighting link - back to the future , which will connect China with Europe pass through Central and Western Asia . And the one road strategy means that the 21st Century "three precious treasures-eunuch's maritime sally will connect China , with Southeast Asia , the Middle East , and Europe.
Put simply , the China's strategic goal will be through this strategy to integrate itself into the global economic system , in particular , shift domestic political and economic instability.
While mighty history and culture will postively bring more force to China's superpower , but it does not resolve , the existing issues in current China's history and culture "BIG-WORDS" relations.
According with the former Soviet Union and the United States of National history have demonstrated that he could be betrayed by the R.O.C. ,and will be betrayed by the PRC ; in particular , China's Yifu Lin, former economist.
That is why his proposal would be historical ridicule.
Obviously , the one belt, one road strategy cannot draw linkages in China.Despite that it is an ambitious.
Indeed , the one belt, one road strategy is just China's misunderstanding , or attributing it to an ambitious intentions about hisotry and culture.

DOES CHINA REALLY NEED ONE BELT , ONE ROAD STRATEGY?

If it is only according with Chinese experts argue that the one belt, one road strategy will be main applications in infrastructure development , in particular , regional transportation network.
In turn , it emploies China's excess capacity to stimulate China’s economic growth and to boost exports.
Especially , it speeds up China's labor-intensive industries , in particular , manufacturing businesses , which eases China’s own its rising as labor costs.
But China’s own its infrastructure developments are weak that it cannot sufficient to become power in the years to come.
While Chinese President Xi Jinping in his emphasis on that we will not change the overall direction of the one belt, one road strategy in 2014.
It cannot denied that history and culture have always made "BIG WORDS" of the grand National strategy ; nonetheless , and most importantly , where the China's government money is?
As in this sense , "BIG WORDS" of history and culture will probably provide Patriotism fire power , but it cannot provide depth and superiority of China's economic war-fighting.

TENSIONS OF HISTORY AND CULTURE AROUND CHINA STILL EXIST.

Indeed , the one belt, one road strategy of history and culture cannot solve many of the long-standing issues in China's domestic.
In their view , the one belt, one road strategy will not only create Chinese peoples' job opportunities , and increase economic interests , and promote China's industrial development in the future.
Put simply , this is just pretty picture on history and culture . Or say , these arguments will be effective , but they overlooked Chinese companies’ irresponsibility.
Chinese people does not know whether the one belt, one road strategy is capable of war-fighting ,or not ; and if so ,what China to be done?
Besides , no matter who will be inevitably volatile political risks of history and culture , that how China will solve deficiency of the one belt, one road strategy?
Ultimately , China should not be over - expectations with the one belt, one road strategy , otherwise , there will bring about problems in the wrong history and culture direction.
I argue that China should intensify domestic environment infrastructure development , and so on ; than push China's National transformation amd shift its labor-intensive industries.

TACTICAL ANALYSS - THE PRC'S ONE BELT , ONE ROAD STRATEGY

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MARCH 7 2015

端視中共插入全球的白帶與厚德路策略，真的是新模式的機會?

2013年，中共已經啟動白帶與厚德路策略作為國家發展策略，驅動積極性國家政治與經濟動員作戰；

然而，所謂白帶與厚德路策略意謂:新絲綢之路經濟作戰鍊，重返古代，穿越中亞和西亞連接中國與歐洲；

厚德路策略意謂：二十一世紀，三寶太監，海洋出擊，將連接東南亞中東與歐洲！

簡單來說，中共的策略目標可能是透過這類策略來打入全球經濟系統；

特別是，轉移國內政治與經濟不穩定！

雖然，偉大的歷史與文化肯定會帶給中共一個更有氣勢的大國地位；

但並沒有解決對當前中國歷史與文化唬爛關係存在的問題！

特別是，中國前經濟學家林毅夫；

並依據美國與前蘇聯的國家歷史已經證明：他能夠背叛中華民國，將來也會背叛中華人民共和國；

是以，他的建議是歷史笑話！

平心而論，白帶與厚德路策略無法繪製聯繫在中國，即使，它是雄心壯志！

其實，白帶與厚德路策略僅是中國的誤解，或歸因於歷史與文化的野心意圖；

那中國真的需要白帶與厚德路策略？

如果，僅依據中國學人認為，白帶與厚德路策略主要應用在基礎建設，特別是區域交通網絡；

另言之，利用中國的產能過剩，刺激中國的經濟成長與提振出口！

格外是，加速轉移中國勞動密集型產業，特別是，製造業產業，以緩和中國自身上升的勞動力成本；

但是，中國自身基礎建設軟弱，不足以在未來幾年成為力量！

雖然，中國國家主席習近平說：不會改變中國白帶與厚德路策略總體方向在2014年；

然而，最重要的是，中國政府的錢在哪裡?

不可否認，歷史與文化總是唬爛偉大的國家策略！

是以，就這個意義來說，歷史與文化的唬爛可，能提供民粹主義的火力；

但是，無法提供中國的經濟作戰深度與優勢！

圍繞中國的歷史與文化緊張情勢依然存在！

其實，歷史與文化的白帶與厚德路策略不會解決許多在中國境內的長期問題；

在他們看來，白帶與厚德路策略，

不僅將創造中國民眾就業機會，並提高經濟利益，與促進中國產業發展在未來；

簡單來說，這僅是一幅美麗的歷史與文化圖畫；

或是說，有些理論可能是有效，但是，卻忽略中國產業的不負責任！

中國人不知道白帶與厚德路策略是否有作戰能力？

並且，如果是這樣的唬爛，那中國怎麼辦呢?

另外，不論是誰，將無可避免善變的歷史與文化的政治風險；

那中國將如何解決白帶與厚德路策略缺失？

最後是，中國不應該過度期待白帶與厚德路策略，否則，在錯誤的歷史與文化的指導，只會產生問題；

個人認為中國應該強化國內環境等基礎發展，以驅動中國的國家轉型，與轉移勞動密集型產業！