POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MARCH 7 2015
According with injecting globe into China’s one belt, one road strategy ; is it really a new opportunity?
The PRC has started the one belt, one road strategy since 2013 , which its as a national development strategy to push actively mobilizable war-fighting in National politics and economies.
Yet , so-called the one belt, one road strategy means that "new silk road economic war-fighting link - back to the future , which will connect China with Europe pass through Central and Western Asia . And the one road strategy means that the 21st Century "three precious treasures-eunuch's maritime sally will connect China , with Southeast Asia , the Middle East , and Europe.
Put simply , the China's strategic goal will be through this strategy to integrate itself into the global economic system , in particular , shift domestic political and economic instability.
While mighty history and culture will postively bring more force to China's superpower , but it does not resolve , the existing issues in current China's history and culture "BIG-WORDS" relations.
According with the former Soviet Union and the United States of National history have demonstrated that he could be betrayed by the R.O.C. ,and will be betrayed by the PRC ; in particular , China's Yifu Lin, former economist.
That is why his proposal would be historical ridicule.
Obviously , the one belt, one road strategy cannot draw linkages in China.Despite that it is an ambitious.
Indeed , the one belt, one road strategy is just China's misunderstanding , or attributing it to an ambitious intentions about hisotry and culture.
DOES CHINA REALLY NEED ONE BELT , ONE ROAD STRATEGY?
If it is only according with Chinese experts argue that the one belt, one road strategy will be main applications in infrastructure development , in particular , regional transportation network.
In turn , it emploies China's excess capacity to stimulate China’s economic growth and to boost exports.
Especially , it speeds up China's labor-intensive industries , in particular , manufacturing businesses , which eases China’s own its rising as labor costs.
But China’s own its infrastructure developments are weak that it cannot sufficient to become power in the years to come.
While Chinese President Xi Jinping in his emphasis on that we will not change the overall direction of the one belt, one road strategy in 2014.
It cannot denied that history and culture have always made "BIG WORDS" of the grand National strategy ; nonetheless , and most importantly , where the China's government money is?
As in this sense , "BIG WORDS" of history and culture will probably provide Patriotism fire power , but it cannot provide depth and superiority of China's economic war-fighting.
TENSIONS OF HISTORY AND CULTURE AROUND CHINA STILL EXIST.
Indeed , the one belt, one road strategy of history and culture cannot solve many of the long-standing issues in China's domestic.
In their view , the one belt, one road strategy will not only create Chinese peoples' job opportunities , and increase economic interests , and promote China's industrial development in the future.
Put simply , this is just pretty picture on history and culture . Or say , these arguments will be effective , but they overlooked Chinese companies’ irresponsibility.
Chinese people does not know whether the one belt, one road strategy is capable of war-fighting ,or not ; and if so ,what China to be done?
Besides , no matter who will be inevitably volatile political risks of history and culture , that how China will solve deficiency of the one belt, one road strategy?
Ultimately , China should not be over - expectations with the one belt, one road strategy , otherwise , there will bring about problems in the wrong history and culture direction.
I argue that China should intensify domestic environment infrastructure development , and so on ; than push China's National transformation amd shift its labor-intensive industries.
TACTICAL ANALYSS - THE PRC'S ONE BELT , ONE ROAD STRATEGY
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 MARCH 7 2015