HISTORY AND CULTURE THEREFORE ARE A BEHAVE OF VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND TERRORISM TO FORCE OUR ADVERSARY
TO FULFIL OUR WILL. - 台灣窮小子
In a white,excellent power where gathered with history and culture to talk future of Country.
History and culture sat at white tables ; and "amiability makes us as one hall" that tried to forge precise definition of "BIG WORDS".
Yet the era of history and culture is ending , I found.
No longer is history and culture only power of physical pushing.
In the future, what defines an act of end will make Nation to keep away from violence.
The norm of what establishes war has been changing , especially , when you move over into the history and culture violence sphere.
So where can we think the way of what establishes a war , and does that mean that the "BIG WORDS" of history and culture can be considered an act of war?
Of course ! Yes ! Absolutely yes!
Because of the "BIG WORDS" of history and culture are almost anything will be attributed to an act of war, it certainly is.
As while in the future , the definition of what is a war will change ; yes , it will , they will be considered to be directly participating in hostilities,and if they are , they will not be changed whether they can be targeted changes.
In turn , we might not realize , since history and culture are targetable , which means that if the Taiwna wants to change , that must change the targetable strategy and tactical deployment.
I do not know how , who the next target will be in history and culture , but their theme was just the asymmetric "BIG WORDS".So , and bear in mind , history and cukture does not applying to National actors.
And does that mean we are in a constant Ending of historystatus of history and culture war?
We need to better understand , that history and culture are an extension of "BIG WORDS" ; nonetheless , "ENDING OF HISTORY" is an extension of National politics and military.