POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 OCT 8 2015
I AM GOING TO TO PLEAD WITH YOU , DO NOT CROSS US.
BECAUSE IF YOU DO , THE SURVIVORS WILL WRITE ABOUT WHAT WE DO HERE FOR 10,000 YEARS.
BEING THOUGHT BY THE UNITED STATES GEN.JAMES.MATTIS
How to carry on Taiwan's Economy.
When I was in the 1970s, I greatly appreciated,and I had the rare opportunity to learn from Taiwan's Mr.Wang Jin-pyng and China's Mr.Fang.
Each taught me how to make big questions in very different model of the mathematics and physics.
However,challenge I was taking an exam on 38 grades of the mathematics ,but Mr.Wang Jin-pyng had always been smiling,who made my brain-spaces bigger and richer, to dig deeper into the National political and military themes,to make more deployments.
For instance,learning for a history of what we had learned from the mathematics,the questions had changed,and we were used to maximize the mathematics.
Besides, Mr.Fang had extensive China's experience as a had extensive experience physicist,on the other hand,he once was Chinese the chief scientist.
I recall they had said that we must focus exclusively on the concrete decision around the corner to realize every detail surrounding it.
Taiwan made a big problem out of the unstable status for history and culture,and lacked of the future deployment of the National Economic relatoions.
In response,history and culture made Taiwan feel that the broad picture was a distraction ; they wanted to focus on texts ,who of what they have never needed to decide at the moment.
Indeed,there are experienced and adventurous,two of models of looking at the Globe,rather than history and culture.
I saw DPP's policy through only history and culture lens,and they did not want decisions to be added in long-term strategy.
Although history and culture had their advantages, but for each decision on the policy,depending on the superiority and challenge at hand.
I kept "we are not turning" in mind when DPP thinking about an important decision facing over the next for the future.
If should we support the inclusion of the China,that we should be waiting another few years until China establishes independence and freedom matures.
The future of history and culture sounds like a narrow question, and in theory,thay did not have dealt with that tactical model.
But I believe that the framework of the Ending of history should be enlarged, and it should be a much broader , general global strategic deployment ; in other words,in this instance DPP cannot be turning.
Here are three " hollows" to keep in mind,the US of a General Douglas MacArthur said.
First,the Taiwan's National Economy was established by all of the Taiwanese,which is a Taiwanese-made National property comprised of a basket,rather than history and culture.
In fact, nothing history and culture does can confer real global status on the National economy.
That said, when the National economy is the composition,and it is pushed to a higher status and level of respectability,and it confers good of
Taiwanese management for Taiwan's financial system.
Of course,today,China is a major force in the global economy,but China is not ready.
Put simply,history and culture are not enough,above all,Taiwan's market must be reliably open,and in addition to China lacks of freedom and independence of conditions exist in now.
To achieve open Taiwan's economic system,which such will be obligated to permit against history and culture,in particular,we deny the government prop them up.
With regard to Tsai Ing-wen's Economic reform,it is critical that solidly and openly regulated,in particular,remove Left-wing of history and culture,including Economy/
To be sure,DPP is moving in transformative directions,and has also instituted many important reforms.Going further is its stated goal,as well,which only wants in now and the future.
So, how should the Taiwan proceed?
Indeed,a narrow view of history and culture have always ask the question whether China is partner, or not?
Put simply,forget about whether how pretty history and culture,since they lack of National enthusiasm,which makes people will surely stay away.
As DPP take a much powerful stance, saying that Taiwan not only must specific reforms proceed,and we must change - the broader Taiwanese Homeland systrm.
I think history and culture will be a mistake,for them will not do justice to National Oligarch interests.
Ending of history is a broader, more strategic National Economic Deployment.
There is a prominent opportunity that if I proposes to Taiwan End,and it will act as an incentive because history and culture lack of full preparation for freedom and independence.
Finally, dealing with Taiwan's Economy should be seen in the National prospection for the future of National financial system, in which Taiwanese will become a major participant ; Ending of history is inevitable.
It will be a significant accomplishment for the Taiwan to create a Global blueprint for the future.
Framing the strategic and tactical deployment the right way
History and culture are too small,we will be miss completely question ; if make them too big,that Taiwanese drown in "BIG WORDS".
【PRAGMATIC ECONOMIC STRATEGIC DEPLOYMENT FOR DEALING WITH TAIWAN】