POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 OCT 24 2015
According with the Air-carrier of the United States,which has been forward deployed to Yokosuka,the Japan,and as the U.S. Seventh Fleet.
Indeed,it does not want to warry about what China does in the South China Sea.
Put simply,China increased upholds history and culture ; although,specifically the question of man-made islands to remark its,but,the US Navy sending ships are near 12 miles,where emphasizes that they do not believe sovereignty over history and culture.
The U.S. Navy has been in protecting the freedom of navigation,and has been maintaining to Global stability and prosperity for more than decades ; this is not being replaced by China.
So,the United States will continue to do so,and the aircraft carriers into the South China Sea.
The principles of the freedom of navigation is not related to the sovereignty of history and culture.
The United States has already justified the global naval activities,which based on the maritime practice,and accords major land economic zones with their islands.In particular,it also permits free use of crucial straits in the globe,to push the stability and prosperity of the global maritime transportation.
The United States Navy helps protect ,and commoiment from the Straits of Malacca to critical shipping lanes in the South China Sea,that make every countries benefits from the freedom of navigation.
In other words,history and culture are not the National capacities in the South China Sea that will attack the freedom of navigation.
Unsinkable the United States Navy
The best tactical guideline for U.S. future maritime patrols in the future - nothing more and nothing special.
As the US's President Barack Obama’s Asia-Pacific re-balance strategy which has committed to deploy military capability to the Asia-Pacific region,that it is a reasonable and balanced change to keep transparent purpose.
So,China has nothing much to complain about.
We must insist on commitment to the basic concept that the South China Sea is for the freedom of navigation-everyone can use it,rather than history and culture.
Especially,a nine-dash line such this is a wild schemes which are depends on behavior of history and culture ; it is not a effective ownership,and we will not be also unacceptable.
There can be little doubt that the United States must execute its commitment to the basic concept that the freedom of navigation in the South China Sea.
And everyone can use the South China Sea ; the sovereignty of history and culture will not change the freedom of navigation that fact.
【RETURNING-THE FREE WATERS IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA】
【THINK AGAIN BY Tsai Ing-wen】