窮小子冷眼輯

【美國總統TRUMP~~~

傳統的美國外交政策與藝術】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 23 NOV 2016
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN Tsai Ing-wen (真命天子)

According with conference of Mr.president Trump , which its a very pragmatism - American tradition.

When changes begin to end and traditional Zeitgeist starts to break out ,

and using terms of history and culture to describe the changes taking place becomes a model in no good.

The world before and after 19th and 20th century looks very different.

Because it still has hope , and we fear , so worry about whether President Donald Trump will change the world as we know it.

In historical perspective , history and culture did only that by building country , and this made a difference with Reagan , but he left.

If President Donald Trump is what he wants to do,but he does not , since the American political system,

with American society will not make him to launch a political revolution.

Of course , absolutely , Presidents can make a difference - whether the American would turn the country in protectionist ,

or isolationist direction , even the collapse of the global liberal order.

A real history and culture stand with the side of the skeptics ,

put simply , and expressing their commitment to the true spirit of friendliness and fairness.

For instance , former president George Walker Bush had been criticizing the strategy of nation building ,

but after the 9/11 terrorist attacks launching an ambitious foreign policy of democratizing the Middle East and pushing nation building there.

Indeed , politicians make a lot of policy commitments during election campaignsn ,

but just a different constituencies , in which some of commitments can be quite important or taken seriously.

Indeed , they were worried that we would try to reverse the policy of diplomatic and economic engagement between the two countries.

Because history and culture are no right mind that lack of experience in national security and foreign policy.

For instance , they had been a firm advocate of Left-wing foreign policy would fire off a nuclear war ,

instead , new Right-wing ended up the end of the Global Cold War.

Put simply , a election of statements on foreign policy,

which in post-election , tend to be as foreign policy doctrine ; end up crashing into reality , or that fire off global crisis.

Under certain conditions though ,

U.S. presidents will be able to dramatically transform policies -

a political , militarily and economically powerful United States will be able to be

in a position to change around the world , such as former president Ronald Reagan.

But all the hysteria among Leftists think that the world is stable ,

and when American presidents took new ways to adjust U.S. policies and deployments to face changing global shameful Leftists.

Do not forget , in historically , elements of the kind of foreign policy that was associated with former president Ronald Reagan.

Or from this perspective , U.S. president Trump’s foreign policy were not really different , at least , it came to levels of stability and security.

U.S. president Trump had opposed a civil war of the country , and fantasies of Leftism , in particular , wasteful building.

Indeed , U.S. president Trump and Obama were not different , who have remained committed to the liberism that has dominated Washington ,

and criticizing China and Russia for violating global norms.

In some ways , U.S. president Trump and Obama were challenging the global axioms of Leftists.

Hence what could distinguish the two president’s the model of thinking.

For instance , U.S. president Obama , he was not to make American into the National civil war ;

and U.S. president Trump will not be unnecessary to apologize to Left-wing thinkers , even he will be seen as an isolationist

So this will be amount to a full-blown model change.

Most significant in this context will be an assessment of future of relationships with Left-wing history and culture support based on whether

they support or injure the United States , irrespective Leftists' conduct aligns with the liberism doctrine.

Similarly , whether the United States not a Leftist country , nor interest to accept the age-old of history and culture.

As U.S. president Trump , he and his administration will prove to be the most effective ,

if ,instead of engaging in Left-wing to spread age-old of history and culture ,

Washington works together with the main power of freedom and independence to maintain the status quo ,

for instance , maintain this country like Taiwan.

As U.S. president Trump's policies would probably be decried by then Leftist condemns , as "cynilcal" ,

and contrary to traditional American values - got Left-ism of the United States into the current chaos in the history and culture.

With the collapse of history and culture , and the bankruptcy of Left-wing ;

U.S. president Trump has gotten mandate from the American people to change the foreign policy course , and at least try to real change.

【MR.PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP 】

【TRADITIONAL ART OF FOREIGN POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES】

端視美國總統川普的發言,它是一類非常實用主義的美國傳統!

當改變已經開始~~~終結的傳統精神已經爆發;

是以使用歷史與文化的術語來描述發生的改變,也就成為無用的模式!

在十九,或是二十世紀之前與之後的世界,看起來就是不一樣!

因為還是有希望,或是我們會擔心?

是以,為什麼會不知道美國總統川普會不會改變我們知道的世界?

從歷史的角度來看,歷史與文化僅是建立國家,這與雷根還是有區別的;但是,他走了!

如果美國總統川普想要做甚麼?

但是,他不會;

因為美國的政治制度與美國人社會不會讓他發動政治革命!

理所當然,美國總統可以有新作為;

美國會不會走向保護主義,或是孤立主義方向,甚至,全球自由秩序的崩潰?

真正的歷史與文化是站在懷疑者這邊;

簡單來說,其承諾於友好與公平精神!

舉例來說,前總統 George Walker Bush 曾經批評國家建設策略;

但是,在9/11恐怖攻擊後,發動一個有抱負的外交政策,讓中東民主化,與驅動那裏的國家建設;

其實,政治家在競選活動期間會作出許多政策承諾;

但僅是一類不同的訴求,其中有些承諾,可能重要,或認真對待!

事實上,它們會擔心,並試圖逆轉兩國外交和經濟合作政策!

因為歷史與文化是沒有正確的頭腦,缺乏國家安全,與外交政策方面的經驗!

舉例來說,堅定支持左翼外交政策將引爆核子戰爭;

相反,新右翼最終,終結全球冷戰!

簡單來說,選舉關於外交政策的聲明,在選舉後,即作為外交政策教義;幾乎是被誇大,

最終崩潰,回到現實,或是引爆全球危機!

在某些狀況,美國總統能夠改變國家政策;

一個政,軍與經濟強大的美國能夠改變全球,或如,前總統 雷根!

但是,所有歇斯底里左翼人士認為世界很穩定;

是以,當美國總統採取新方法調整美國政策與部署,以面對不斷改變的全球不要臉左翼!

不要忘記歷史故事~~~前總統 雷根那類外交政策的因素!

或從這個角度來看,美國總統川普的外交政策沒有甚麼不同款;

至少,在穩定與安全層面!

美國總統川普反對國家內戰與左翼主義的幻想,特別是浪費的建設!

其實,美國總統TRUMP 與 OBAMA 並沒有甚麼不同;

他們致力於華盛頓主導自由主義,並批判中國與俄羅斯,違反全球規範!

在某些方面,美國總統TRUMP 與 OBAMA 挑戰左翼全球主義原則;

因此,可以區分兩個總統的思考模式~~~

舉例來說,美國總統OBAMA 不讓美國人,進入另一個國家內戰;

美國總統TRUMP 沒有必要向左翼思想家道歉,即使,他可能被視為孤立主義者!

所以,這可能將是一個完全的模式改變?

在這種狀況下,最重要的是依據左翼歷史與文化會不會支持;

或是損害美國來評估未來關係;

不論左翼行為是不是符合自由主義學理?

同樣地,美國不是左翼國家,也沒有興趣接納古老的歷史與文化!

是以美國總統川普與他的政府將能被證明是有效的;

如果,華盛頓不與左翼一起參與傳播古老的歷史與文化;

而是與主要的自由與獨立力量一起~~~維持現狀;

舉例來說,維持如台灣這樣的國家?

美國總統川普的政策通常被左翼所譴責為犬儒?

這與傳統的美國價值顛倒,左翼美國陷入混亂的歷史與文化!

隨著歷史與文化的的崩潰,以及左翼知識的徹底失敗;

美國總統川普取得美國人的授權,改變外交政策;

或者,至少嘗試真正的改變!