窮小子冷眼輯

【RIDICULOUS THE CARRIER-KILLER ROCKET】

Indeed , Chinese aircraft carrier was a ridicule , and wasting the money , in particularly , funny the carrier-killer missile.
Although PLA has developed its DF-21D and DF-26 (ASBMs) , which became mainstay of anti-access and area-denial defenses.
Absolutely , of course , the carrier-killer has become to strike U.S. Navy nuclear-powered aircraft carriers (CVNs).
Indeed , the PLA can now use DF-21Ds to attack aircraft carriers , when more than one thousand miles from China's shorelines.
But the U.S. Navy did not fear it , or more precisely , they have had carrier-killers of their own.
Indeed , carrier-killer superiority where a sea fight takes place.
Worse , PLA commanders believe that the carrier-killer would be a miracle of maritime-historical , and deliberate to march into the blue water.
So carrier-killer with Western countries comes as little astonished , or provoke U.S. more efforts to help Asian partners.
The DF-26 will be approximately firing range of 1,800-2,500 miles.
Maybe , fascinates over firing range like technology.
But the technology mismatch will be able to get worse.
If without technology talks about , PLA ballistic missiles will threat U.S. , including the seas anywhere within Asia's second island chain.
From the Pacific perspective , from coastal China is launching a ballistic missiles that will make Japan , Taiwan , or other Pacific countries to live under the shadow of missile attack.
Now , the PLA has never tested the DF-21D.
However , we are not without options in naval war , yes , far from it.
It depends on where the encounter took place.
A battle group fight involving carriers will take a far away ballistic missiles on the open sea , rather than aircraft and cruise missiles - just submarines.
So-called the aircraft carriers are just a fleet-on-fleet affair , whatever firepower , or any force to the war-fighting mission would decide the consequence.
Even if PLA commanders would let land-based rockets into the maritime , but at the same time , the U.S. Navy would be able to joint alongside partner - Naval , where in ocean combat.
For instance , partner - Naval could use its advantageous maritime , jointing the land force to intensify war-fighting capability of the carrier-based vanguard groups.
In short , there are the two tactical deployments apparently from each other , but PLA is messier and more inclined to vulnerability - uncertainty, and instability - not to mention the superiority of the US Navy.
So-called the submarine warfare would constitute a common features in U.S. maritime strategy for oceanic strategic combat.
For instance , Nuclear-powered attack submarines can attack surface shipping on the international waters.
It is jointed war-fighting flattops , if it is reasonable doubts , rather than history and culture.
In other words , Nuclear-powered attack submarines remain workhorses in U.S. Navy.
Overlooked China is bulking up its fleet , or Russia is starting its silent-fleet , as well ; rather then focus on the surface-to-surface missiles system.
Whatever the tactical maritime setting of the future, submarines , then , are maritime - killers
Now , there is a "BIG WORDS "of history and culture to talk about the surface-to-surface missiles system , and Chinese aircraft carrier.
The PLA Navy has just one aircraft carrier , a re-fitted Soviet vessel , then , dubbed Liaoning - that are reportedly undergoing build the next one , but the most likely improved versions of Liaoning.
Let’s assume Chinese first indigenously built carrier , indeed , it should the same dimensions and conventionally propelled vessel as Liaoning.
Let’s further assume that the PLA Navy has owned operate carrier capability and experiences at sea , if really so , the PLA Navy will integrate the new carrier into the maritime operations , consequently , I suppose that new matitime-conflict will fire off after 2020.
Today , in 2020 , the air-wing will remain the U.S. Navy’s chief carrier-killer.
For instance , the U.S. carriers can deploy approximately about 85 tactical aircraft , meanwhile , Chinese carrier owns 50 planes ; so that means , the U.S. carriers firepower will be 50 percentpowerful than the PLA Navy .
Meanwhile , the U.S. carriers will use new the electromagnetic catapults to make jets off their flight decks.
For instance , F-18E / F fighter/attack jets can against targets approximately 500 miles distant , rather than counting their radius.Simply put , they can , U.S. Navy.
By 2020 , deterrence-powerful weaponry would have matured and joined the U.S. Navy.
In attition to the US Navy , will operate the SM-6 surface-to-air missile for antiship missions.
Trouble is , history and culture engagement is that we do not know what they fight over in ? and what would the PLA Navy to venture?
Whose waging war will prove troublesome in history and culture?
All in all , history and culture will bring a wicked tactical and shamefulness for U.S. skippers.
The ridiculous carrier-killer missile
It cannot denied that the PLA Navy is a modern-day fleet , bit they are safely within range of land-based defenses and supplementing its own firepower - to counterattack a more powerful fleet action.
The PLA Navy is a fortress , and will not leave home , but China is depending on it.
Historically , Chinese fortress - concept had pitiful - no maritime concept , so I think that , apparently , the powerful defender against adversary attack , but will not be as a protection.
For instance , in May 1905, when Japanese combined fleet and the Russian fleet met in action at Tsushima Strait , consequently , the debacle of the Russian fleet.
Finally , the U.S. Navy , it remains optimized for the maritime conflict that is least likely to change , when who will predominate that are most menacing and most likely to happen.

【笑話的航艦殺手】

其實,中國的航空母艦是一個笑話與浪費錢,特別是古怪的航艦殺手;
雖然,解放軍(PLA) 發展DF-21D與DF-26（ASBM）,以作為反入侵與區域介入防衛主力;
當然,航艦殺手成為擊殺美國海軍核動力航空母艦（CVN）!
事實上,解放軍現在能夠使用DF-21D,攻擊航空母艦當接近中國海岸線超過一千公里;
但是,美國海軍並不害怕,或者,更準確地說,有自己的航艦殺手!
其實,航艦殺手的優勢是在海戰發生的地方;
更糟糕的是,解放軍指揮官認為航艦殺手是一個海洋歷史的奇蹟,並不樂意走入藍水!
是以西方國家並不驚訝這類航艦殺手;
或是刺激美國更努力地幫助亞洲夥伴!
DF-26 射程大概是1,800 - 2,500英里!
也許著迷於射程遠遠超過了技術;
但是,技術不協調將可能變得很糟糕!
如果不討論技術,不可否認,解放軍彈道飛彈可能威脅美國,包括第二個島鏈條的任何地方;
從太平洋角度來看,從中國沿海發射一個彈道飛彈,將讓日本,台灣,或其他太平洋國家將生活在飛彈攻擊的陰影之下!
現在解放軍還沒有測試DF-21D;
然而,面對海戰,全然沒有選擇,差很遠;
這決定在面對面的地方!
涉及航空母艦戰鬥群的決戰是遠離彈道飛彈的廣闊海洋;
而不是飛機與巡弋飛彈,而是潛艦!
所謂航空母艦 , 僅是一個艦隊的故事 ;
不論是火力 , 或是每一個力量到作戰任務 , 將會決定結果!
即使中國解放軍指揮官將地對地飛彈投入海洋 , 但同時 ;
美國海軍能夠聯合其夥伴海軍 , 在海洋接戰!
舉例來說 , 夥伴海軍能夠運用其優勢海洋 , 聯合陸軍 , 以強化航艦戰鬥群的作戰能力!
總之 , 這是兩類完全不同款的戰術部署 ;
但中國解放軍是混亂的 , 很容易出問題-不確定與不穩定 ;
更不用說 , 一個優勢的美國海軍!
所謂美國海洋策略部署是建立在潛艦作戰與大洋作戰策略的共同特色;
舉例來說 , 核能攻擊潛艦可攻擊公海上水面船隻!
這是聯合作戰平台防衛 , 如果是合理的懷疑 , 而不是歷史與文化的挑釁 ;
換句話說 , 核能攻擊潛艦才是美國海軍的主力!
忽略中國正在擴充其艦隊 , 或是俄羅斯也正在啟動沈默的艦隊 ;
這是一個嚴重的錯誤 , 而不是專注在地對地飛彈系統!
不論未來海洋戰術環境如何如何 , 潛艦都是海洋殺手;
現在 , 還是有一個歷史與文化的唬爛 , 討論地對地飛彈系統與中國航空母艦?
中國解放軍海軍只有一台 , 改裝來自前蘇聯艦隻 , 然後 , 命名遼寧 ;
聽說還在建造下一艘 , 但最有可能是改良後遼寧號模式?
讓我們假設中國第一艘自主建造航空母艦 ~~~
其實 , 它應該與遼寧號大致相同尺寸與傳統推力的艦艇!
讓我們進一步假設 , 解放軍海軍擁有大洋操作航空母艦能力與經驗?如果真是這樣 , 解放軍海軍將會快速地讓航空母艦整合到海洋作戰?因此 , 我假設 , 新海洋衝突將會在2020後爆發?
今天 , 或是2020年 , 飛機還是美國海軍的主要航艦殺手;
舉例來說 , 美國航空母艦大能夠部署八十架飛機 , 未來 , 中國航空母艦有五十架飛機 ?
這意味是美國航空母艦戰力將會是解放軍海軍強百分之五十!
同時 , 美國航空母艦將會啟用新電磁彈射器 , 讓飛機離開飛行甲板;
舉例來說 , F-18E / F能夠針對大概五百海里遠的目標攻擊 ;
而不是計算它們的半徑 , 簡單來說一個優勢-美國海軍 ,可以!
2020年 , 嚇阻力強的武器將會成熟並加入美國海軍;
另外是 , 美國海軍將重新使用SM-6飛彈進行反艦任務?
麻煩的是 , 歷史與文化的參與 , 不知道它們在太平洋會玩什麼?
什麼會是解放軍海軍的冒險?
誰發動戰爭將會證明 ,麻煩是在歷史與文化!
總而言之 , 歷史與文化將給美國艦長帶來一個邪惡的戰術與不要臉!
航艦殺手的笑話
不可否認 , 解放軍海軍是一個現代化的艦隊 , 但是 , 它們是安全地在陸地防衛範圍內 , 補充自己的火力 , 以對抗一個更強大的艦隊行動!
解放軍海軍是一個無法離開家的堡壘 , 但是 , 中國正在依靠它!
從歷史上來說 , 中國堡壘理念是很可憐的-沒有海洋理念 ;
我認為 , 表面上是很強大 , 可以打擊敵人的攻擊 , 但無法作為保護;
舉例來說 , 1905年5月 , 日本聯合艦隊與俄羅斯艦隊在津島海峽相遇 , 結果 , 俄羅斯艦隊崩潰!
最後是 , 美國海軍還是樂觀針對最不可能發生的海洋衝突 l 進行改變;當在最具威脅狀況下 , 誰將主導優勢!?