窮小子冷眼輯

【網友陳伊力的納悶】【新模式國家後備動員機制】【二】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN 蔡英文之首席真命天子
FIRST , FEBRUARY  , 2018

【2】【Current absurities in Taiwanese Left-wing's militia】
Current absurities in Taiwanese Left-wing's militia.
The current chaotic - bureaucracies situation of the administrative structures in the Taiwan's DPP government have brought about the enormous negative effect on the National Defense Deployments.
This is a particularly dangerous development when taken against the background of socialismn, or communism , from Left-wing's history and culture give up the free economy and from independent political mechanism.
Left-wing's history and culture have left the National military forces virtually on their own , or leading forced change within the National military forces in their Nation of ideological , political , strategic , economic , and demographic contexts.
The fundamental deficiency in the current military strategy and Left-wing's history adn culture are a great relaxation in Taiwan's DPP government.
In addition , this lack of Left-wing's history and culture control have mismanagement and enormous chaos , and has disarranged much needed military reform.
It has created enormous disasters for the Taiwanese military by preventing redeployment of forces , reducing defense conversion , worsening the military personnel system , and hastily affecting Taiwan for most of its officers.
Left-wing's militia lacks of the National security concept , only the model of the National Reserve Mobilization condition has been adapted by traditional military trainings and concepts.
In other words , The military forces and the departments of the Taiwanese General Staff should intensify the National stratgies and doctrines , the models of deployment , personnel missions , rather than Left-wing's militia has come at the expense of readiness and training , in turn , their ability to execute missions warranted by the National security is scant.
Institutionally , Taiwanese military are different than other countries , only keep history and culture , overlook as Taiwanese people of our traditional strategic roles , while not allow to the realities of the operational missions amd the war environment. 
Hense , the self-preservation of Left-wing's history and culture determine for Left-wing's militia framework and deployment , with the primary condition being taken over power.
So National military strategy pushes the threat assessment. 
Through with threat assessments establishing the National Reserve Mobilization , deployment , and mechanism.
To some extent , whatever military as well as civilian , must be subject to this kind of mobilizable behavior. 
But in Taiwan , it has become risen to the highest standred due to the general domestic chaos which is taking place against uncertainty Left-wing's history and culture in the security environment.
In recent years, the skin-deep declarations by Taiwanese former president Chen Shui-Bian , that Taiwan has no Left-wing and Right-wing that put the Taiwanese military in a predicament.
Is the Taiwanese military not supposed to prepare for warfare ?
If so , the National Reserve Mobilization Mechanism will bring into question their very reason for being. 
In turn , we do not ask for warfare , and do not fear for warfare.
Taiwanese top political and military leaders could not make options from Left-wing's history and culture , and thereby destroy our comprehensive defense capabilities. 
The bureaucrats of Left-wing's history and culture have never been unwilling to take risks.
So making difficult decisions and options which means that must be imposed by a determined Taiwanese top political and military leaders establishment.
It follows from the new military strategic doctrine that Left-wing's militia is complex.
As we want to being prepared for wars of the future.
Taiwanese military forces must be prepared to fight alongside partners or to fight alone. 
As primitive as Left-wing's militia , history and culture guerrillas , attack us sophisticatedly to do the same , so if being ready to fight effectively counterattack ; if our Reserve Mobilization Force can be as powerful.
It follows that Taiwanese Reserve Mobilization Force must be ready to counterattack any Left-wing's militia invasion of  Taiwanese homeland and capable of mounting military interventions beyond when needed.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【二】【當前台灣的左翼民兵】
當前台灣的左翼民兵
當前台灣民進黨政府,行政機構官僚混亂的狀況,已經對國家防衛部署,造成巨大的負面影響;
在左翼歷史與文化放棄自由經濟,從獨立的政治機制,向社會主義,或是共產主義的背景下,這是一個非常危險的發展!
在左翼歷史與文化武裝力量,強制改變,或導致國家思想,政治,戰略,經濟與人口等各類背景下;
這讓國家軍事力量幾乎全靠左翼歷史與文化!
當前台灣民進黨政府的軍事戰略基本性不足,大幅放鬆左翼歷史與文化管理;
而且,這類左翼歷史與文化控制的缺失,造成不當管理與巨大的混亂,打亂迫切需要的軍事變革!
這給台灣軍隊造成巨大的災難,妨礙部隊調動,降低防衛轉型,惡化軍隊人事機制,給台灣軍官帶來破壞性影響;
左翼民兵缺乏國家安全理念,只有透過傳統的軍事訓練與觀念來適應新模式國家後備動員條件!
換句話說,台灣軍隊與參謀本部應該強化國家戰略與學理,部署模式,兵員任務;
而不是左翼民兵犧牲訓練與戰備,另言之執行國家安全任務的能力不足!
在體制上,台灣軍隊與其他國家不同;
只會保留歷史與文化,忽略傳統性台灣人的戰略角色,同時,不承認作戰任務與戰爭環境的現實;
因此,左翼歷史與文化的自我保護決定左翼民兵的架構與部署;
主要的因素是奪權!
所以,國家軍事戰略驅動威脅評估;
透過威脅評估來建立國家後備動員機制部署與架構;
在一定程度上,不論是軍人或是民眾,必須受制於這類動員性行為;
但在台灣,不確定性左翼歷史與文化發生國內普遍混亂的安全環境,已經上升到高標準!
近年來台,灣前總統 陳水扁對台灣沒有左右翼的膚淺宣言,讓台灣軍隊陷入窘境;
那台灣軍隊是否要做備戰?
如果是這樣,那這就是國家後備動員機制存在的理由l
另言之,我們不求戰,也不怕戰!
台灣高層政軍領導人不能從左翼歷史與文化做出選擇,從而破壞我們全面性防衛能力;
左翼歷史與文化官僚從來不願意承擔風險!
所以,做出困難的決定與選擇,意味著必須由堅定的高層政軍領導人來強化!
依據新的軍事戰略學理左翼民兵是很複雜的;
是以我們要為未來的戰爭做好準備;
台灣人部隊必須準備與夥伴一起作戰.或是單獨作戰;
像左翼民兵歷史與文化游擊隊.同樣狡猾地攻擊我們;
如果,有必要,準備有效地反擊;
如果,我們的後備動員武力能夠強大?
因此,台灣後備動員武力必須準備好反擊對台灣國土的任何左翼民兵入侵,並且,在需要時,能夠進行軍事干預!