22195673_1189705327798190_6922522018862961800_n.jpg

【左翼歷史與文化的挑釁~~~中國不是恐怖國家?】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN , Tsai Ing-wen's the son of destiny
FIFTH,JULY,2018

The provocation of Left-wing's history and culture give offense to Sino that would be a disaster.
Why hate the Sino ? Put simply , the misconception surrounding history and culture relations, none is any sense.
Although , U.S. President Donald Trump appears to Sino's  good intentions - that US is not cooperating with Sino to fight , why ? Because Chinese are effective.
Left-wing's terrorism and extremism are an ideology for history and culture.
They need to be ended , and only will not be defeated only militarily , so as makes the tactics and principles so importance.
It is for this reason that accepts a partnership with Left-wing that will be a crisis far danger than Chinese..
If in the Western countries the individual is seen as an end in himself,but in Sino's history and culture he is not element for the fulfilling of whatever political objectives are visualized by the country and its leaders.
It is this difference in history and culture that leads Sino in a National security situation to deploy in models that are incompatible with values of independence and freedom,in particular,to cooperate with Left-wing's extremisa and terrorists,and to take indiscriminate violence behavior,who destroy and impact the country.
For instance,in China,Left-wing's history and culture attack for using violence against people has been detailedly demonstrated - it deliberately targets Freedom and Independence.
In turn,indiscriminate killing by Chinese is not restricted to their homeland , and it is long-standing history and culture practice.
Given Sino's record on this issue of history and culture,it should have come as no astonishment.
Sino's double game on Left-wing's history and culture violent terrorism and extremism.
In addition to disregard for Chinese people,Sino has a long history of using extremists and terrorists for its own objectives,including while ostensibly cooperating with the Right-wing's free and independent countries.
For instance,with the outbreak of the tension in South China Sea,there is evidence that Sino is pushing the dangerous gamble,where they fight for Left-wing's history and culture.
Indeed,the most critical condition why Sino will not be our partners in the Global Society that its geopolitical goals are fundamentally different from those of us,in particular,opposed to independence and freedom.
For instance,when we objected to China's history and culture,and then,Chinese began threatening us with military force attack.
For instance,Taiwan and the Hongkong pose no danger to China,but they are useful tools to stoke the aggressive China's Left-wing's history and culture that the Xi Jinping's regime uses to solidify its hold on political power.
But in turn,the Xi Jinping's regime pose a serious potential danger to the free countries.
China will not defeat us in an all-out war,but but it has strategic superiority in the region,such as it would provoke a conflict and then threaten to use nuclear weapons,making us with a option of backing down.
If we are unwise enough to try to rope China in as a partner,and cannot be misled into thinking that the Chinese will take us into account.
Because of such cooperation would involve acceding to historical and cultural hegemony,and giving up our friends and partners.
The safest strategy for the current Taiwan is to engage with China only in cases,such as trade and dealing with civilians,where such contact cannot be avoided.
There should certainly be no quid pro quo for Chinese support in the form of the sacrifice Left-wing's history and culture of commitments to its principles and trusted us.
Taiwanese leaders should not allow themselves to be drawn into Sino's history and culture logic.
Far more advisable is to base strategy on an objective evaluation of Chinese actions.
Those actions make clear that Chinese does not qualify as a partner of the Taiwan.
Accordingly,Taiwan needs nothing so much as to be said - we do not want to Left turn.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1490154142-2442195221.jpg

【THE PROVOCATION OF LEFT-WING'S HISTORY AND CULTURE - SINO IS NOT TERRORISTIC COUNTRY】

POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN , Tsai Ing-wen's the son of destiny
FIFTH,JULY,2018

左翼歷史與文化的挑釁~~~中國將會是一個災難!
為什麼討厭中國?
簡單來說,在環繞歷史與文化關係的幻想,沒有任何理由!
雖然,美國總統川普對中國有良好的善意,美國不會與中國合作打擊,為什麼?
因為中國人是沒有效率!
歷史與文化,恐怖主義與極端主義是一類左翼意識形態;
它們需要被終結,僅是以軍事力量,無法擊敗;
是以戰術與原則,特別重要!
正是因為這個理由,接受左翼夥伴關係,將會出現一個比中國危險的危機!
如果是在西方國家,個人僅是被視為自我終結:
但是,在中國的歷史與文化,個人不是實現國家與領導人所設想的任何政治目標的因素;
正是這類歷史與文化的差異,導致中國在國家安全情勢中的部署模式,與獨立和自由的目標,不相同;
特別是與左翼極端分子與恐怖分子合作,以及採取不分青紅皂白的暴力行為,破壞與影響國家!
舉例來說,在中國左翼歷史與文化對民眾使用暴力攻擊已經出現充份證明~~~它故意針對自由與獨立!
另言之,中國不分青紅皂白地殺褥,不僅限於本土;

它是長期性歷史與文化的實行!
有鑑於中國在這類歷史與文化的紀錄,毫不驚訝;
中國的雙重遊戲在左翼暴力歷史與文化極端主義與恐怖主義!
除了無視中國民眾之外,中國使用極端份子與恐怖份子,用於本身目標的悠久歷史,包括,表面上與右邊獨立與自由國家合作!
舉例來說,隨著南中國海爆發緊張情勢,有證據表明,中國正在驅動危險的賭博,在哪裡,它們為左翼歷史與文化戰鬥?

其實,中國在全球社會中,不能成為我們的夥伴,最關鍵的因素是它的地緣政治目標與我們的基本理念不同,特別是,反對獨立與自由!
舉例來說,當我們反對中國的歷史與文化時,中國人開始用軍事力量攻擊威脅我們:
舉例來說,台灣與香港對中國,沒有威脅;
但它們是煽動習近平政權用來穩固其政治權力的侵略性中國左翼歷史與文化的有效工具!
但是,相反地說,習近平政權又對自由國家構成嚴重性潛在危險;

中國無法在全面性戰爭擊敗我們,但它在區域具有戰略優勢;
或如可能引爆衝突,然後,威脅使用核武,讓我們有退一步的選項!

如果,我們不聰明地嘗試拉中國成為夥伴,但也不能被誤導為認為中國重視我們?
因為,這類合作將涉入歷史與文化霸權,並放棄我們的朋友與夥伴!
當前台灣最安全的策略是,只與中國進行接觸,或如貿易與處理民眾,這類聯繫是不可避免的;
中國的支持,肯定不會以犧牲左翼歷史與文化對它們的原則與信任我們的承諾模式出現!
台灣領導人不應該允許自己被吸引到中國歷史與文化邏輯;
重要的是,將策略作為對中國行動的客觀評價基礎;

這類行動清楚說明,中國不符合台灣的夥伴;
因此,台灣甚麼也不需要說明~~~我們不轉彎!

 

    全站熱搜

    台灣窮小子 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()