窮小子冷眼輯

【十八】【為什麼總統 蔡英文之真命天子就是這般聰明】
【同意，台灣總統蔡英文，絕對不是尋求左翼獨立】
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子
台灣總統 蔡英文之首席真命天子
THREE，MAY，2020
 

同意，台灣總統蔡英文，絕對不是尋求左翼獨立。
左翼白痴攻訐蔡英文的獨立性，這是明顯的陽謀，只是偽造的。
大多數全球注意都集中在台灣總統蔡英文對中國病毒大流行的反應上，但是有趣的是，左翼白痴們把民進黨的政治平台顯示為左翼台灣獨立。
所以，這是錯誤的。
這是一個假訊息，虛假地代表台灣，及其台灣總統發布歇斯底里的戰爭，如此，現實地說，我們必須挑戰左翼歷史和文化，跟把左翼白痴置諸腦後。
實際上，根據台灣的歷史和政治，我們支持所謂的維持現狀，即與美國和日本保持關係，而不是與左翼中共，和中國。
因此，將台灣稱為獨立國家是一個既定事實，僅缺乏對國家地位的法律保護。
事實上，台灣民進黨從來沒有主張獨立，或者說，它認為讓台灣正在轉向左翼，而民進黨則主張左翼，這意味著它不尋求台灣地位的任何改變。
根據1989年歷史，民進黨確實提出了尋求正式獨立的平台，因為前總統陳水扁加入了“新國家運動”，但民進黨自1999年以來，在其憲章中進行了改寫。
實際上，民進黨已經承認“中華民國”是台灣正式名稱和治國製度，除非“中華民國”正式放棄了台灣。
有趣的是，台灣左翼人類確實希望民進黨主張直接模式的台灣獨立
但是，蔡英文是維持現狀，她是對的 - 她透過維持台灣傳統現狀來爭取更多的全球權利。
例如，台灣左翼呼籲改變國家憲法為"台灣國"，或者他們認為台灣不會因為中華民國而成為獨立國家，就是這樣，台灣左翼就是依循在歷史和文化的鬼魂這邊。
例如，蔡英文，她一再強調要競選中華民國總統，並明確指出這是指台灣。
事實上，她這樣做是用普通話說的，台灣是一個獨立國家，而不是簡體中文，所以，就是這樣，她想以此區分，台灣是台灣，而不是左翼中國。
實際上，從國家戰略的角度來看，民進黨也沒有提供任何改變台灣地位的戰略。
換句話說，蔡英文的“維持現狀”有助於提高台灣的現有存在，而不是改變它。
有趣的是，台灣左翼白痴始終不理會，與無視於蔡英文，在一個女人，她沒直接或間接地尋求改變台灣的地位。
但是，大多數台灣人希望最終實現正式獨立的目標，但我們必須尊重美國，以便首先必須保持台灣傳統現狀。
然而，在獨立支持者之間，左翼歷史與文化代溝加速獨立支持者，與黨國之中華民國支持者，這就是為什麼可能可能對此問題持更強硬的立場。
不幸的是，與國民黨對比的是，從這種模式中依樣畫葫蘆-推動一種現狀，即親中國的現狀，因此，台灣人不能容忍最終以某種形式讓台灣更靠近中國的目標。
例如，前總統馬英九（Ma Ying-jeou）用歷史和文化這個術語，目的在透過本土化侵蝕台灣。
換句話說，對於台灣獨立支持者，他們甚至不希望與左翼中國，甚至中華民國建立關係。
例如2014年太陽花運動，左翼歷史和文化更加獨立。
根據全球歷史，實際上不是在倡導台灣獨立，左翼獨立在台灣周圍建立了一個假框架，這必然會導致內戰。
所以，蔡英文，她是親現狀，實際上沒有說台灣不是中國，它只是中華民國，而不是左翼中共。
沒有人願意挑釁左翼歷史和文化，因為白痴比台灣人民更需要挑釁。
例如，我們推動傳統台灣，比左翼獨立更積極地推進台灣作為一個國家正常化。
當然，台灣左翼白痴總是有愚蠢的微妙之處。
當我們看到中國病毒如何教給我們任何東西時，準確性就很重要。
我們維持傳統台灣的現狀，這是一個簡單的改變。
就是這樣。

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【15】【Absolutely，yes，Taiwan's president Tsai Ing-wen is not seeking Left-wing's Independence.】
Absolutely，yes，Taiwan's president Tsai Ing-wen is not seeking Left-wing's Independence.
Left-wing's idiots attack Tsai Ing-wen independence by exposing faults，and it is overt plot，and just fake.
Most of the global spotlight focus on Taiwanese president Tsai Ing-wen responses to Chinese Virus pandemic，but interestingly，Left-wing's idiots have shown the Democratic Progressive Party’s political platform as Left-wing's Taiwanese Independence.
So it is a wrong.
It is a fake news that falsely represents Taiwan and its president a war hysteria，so that say on the situation realistically，that we must challenge with Left-wing's history and culture，and left behind Left-wing's idiots.
Indeed，and according with Taiwanese history，and politics，we support for what is known in as the maintaining the status quo along relations with the United States and the Japan，rather than with Left-wing's CCP and the China.
So referring to Taiwan is an accomplished fact as independent country that lacks legal protection of statehood.
For some reason，Taiwanese DPP has never position on independence，or that said，it considers Taiwan to be turning Left-wing，and the DPP advocates for Left-wing，meaning it does not seek any sort of change to Taiwan’s status.
According to history of 1989，the DPP did propose a platform seeking formal independence，as former president Chen Shui-Bian，who was joined "New Country movement"，but the DPP re-wrote within its own charter since 1999.
Indeed，the DPP has acknowledged the name “Republic of China” as Taiwan’s official name and governing system，unless，“Republic of China” has given up officially the Taiwan.
Interestingly，Taiwanese Leftists who do wish the DPP advocated for direct form of Taiwanese Independence.
But being Tsai Ing-wen's maintaining the status quo，and she was right - who pushes for more global rights through maintaining the traditional status quo to Taiwan.
For instance，Taiwanese Leftists who call for changing the National constitution as a Taiwanguo，or they argue that Taiwan will not be independent country because of the ROC，this is it，Taiwanese Leftists camp on one side of ghost of history and culture.
For instance，Tsai Ing-wen，she repeatedly emphasized that she was running for president of the Republic of China，and with the specification that this refers to Taiwan.
In fact，she does so she says in Mandarin it is an independent country as the Taiwan，not sisimplified Chinese language，so this is it，she wanted to this distinction which meaning to Taiwan is Taiwan，not Left-wing's China.
Indeed，from a National Strategy perspective，the DPP has also not offerd any strategy that change Taiwan’s status. 
In other words，Tsai Ing-wen's "Maintaining the Status Quo" helps raise Taiwan’s current existence，not change it. 
Interestingly，Taiwanese Left-wing's idiots have always disregard her，under a woman，and there in none of directly or indirectly seeks to change Taiwan’s status.
However，most of Taiwanese people want a eventual goal of formal independence，but we must respect the United States，so that we must be maintaining the status quo of the Traditional Taiwan at first.
Yet，Left-wing's history and culture gap speeds up among independence supporters who could not be toleratingthe  maintaining the status quo of the Traditional Taiwan，and "One Party，One Country" of the ROC’s activists，so that is why may take a more hardline position on the issue.
Unfortunately，by contrast the KMT，whuch draws a gourd from the model - pushes for a status quo，a pro-China status quo，so Taiwanese people is not tolerated with the goal of eventually letting Taiwan closer to China in some form. 
Such as，former President Ma Ying-jeou，he used the term of history and culture aimed at eroding the Taiwan through localization.
In other words，for Taiwanese Independence supporters，they do not want the relations with Left-wing's China，even the R.O.C.
Such as the 2014 Sunflower Movement，Left-wing's history and culture is far more pro-independence.
According with the Global history，it is matter not actually advocating for Taiwanese independence? 
Left-wing's independence puts a fake framework around the Taiwan，and that makes will inevitably a civil war.
So Tsai Ing-wen，she is pro-status-quo，without actually saying Taiwan is not China — it is just the ROC，not Left-wing's CCP.
No one does want to provoke Left-wing's history and culture，with idiots any more than Taiwanese people have to do so.
Such as，we push for the Traditional Taiwan and more aggressive normalization of Taiwan as a country than Left-wing's independence does.