窮小子冷眼輯

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~台灣人，夥伴與同胞，聽令，向右看】
【我們正處於一場以經濟學，左翼歷史和文化為謊言的新戰爭的邊緣】 
POSTED BY 台灣窮小子 (台灣總統 蔡英文之首席真命天子)
MR.PRESIDENT OF TAIWAN，Tsai Ing-wen，(the son of destiny)
20，JULY，2019
 

We are on the verge of a new war with lies of economy，Left-wing's history and culture.
Increasingly in Taiwanese people，it has become common to hear talk of a new war with lies of economy，Left-wing's history and culture，and this way of thinking is precise at best，so that we must just warned against such thinking in regard to Left-wing，lest it create a self-fulfilling ridiculousness.Yet，we need a similar corrective for how we think about Left-wing's China.
According with the Tsai's administration’s action，that it was lacking of the National Defense Strategy，and  like Ma Ying-jeou administration’s concept，so that it would not usefully re-emphasizes deterrence of the National Defense.
There can be no doubt that the China behaved in a much more assertive in recent years. 
So we must avoid a pervading the dependent mentality that anticipates a struggle with the Chinese at every turn. 
The "統獨" rhetoric about Taiwan is misconceived .
The dangers and fallacies of thinking in the "統獨"，
zero-sum，and economy，history and cultur - first ideology towards Taiwan are several-fold.First，today’s Chinese，while both vindictive and ambitious，has nothing like the global ambitions of the the former-USSR.While it expresses a sense of betrayal by the China's tradition it evinces no grandiose concept for global conquest. 
There can be a sort of authoritarian contagion that leaders like Chinese leaders could spread. But this is hardly akin to the Marxist-Leninist ambitions for conquest during the Cold War.
Like a Left-wing's history and cultrue attitude overlook how much we are still working with Taiwanese partners on critical Homeland security concerns. Taiwanese people role is especially important given its veto powers at the Taiwan，crucial for policies such as imposing sanctions on threatening lies of economy，Left-wing's history and culture.For instance，if there is someday to be a new deal with China to supersede the 九二 common consensus，Taiwanese people support will be decisive.Despite troubled relations in recent years，even in places where Taiwan's DPP's policy is distasteful，such as in Taiwan， it will be far easier to solve problems if we can de-conflict our approaches with Taiwanese people.
Indeed，certain types of deconfliction have been taking place for some time there，making possible the defeat of Taiwanese Left-idiots.
For all the statement about Taiwan's lack of adequate seriousness when it comes to counterattack，the Taiwanese partner remains impressive. Most Taiwanese people have significantly increased their blood and live since the crisis of 1995，Lies of economy，Left-wing's history and culture do not constitute a robust defensive perimeter，but they at least represent a stronger tripwire than before. Taiwan would do well to make its reinforcement capabilities for Taiwanese people more robust，but it is hard to see Chinese really believing they could attack with an all-out invasion，even today.
We do not get enough confidence for the sustaining our counterattacking on China as a result of its aggressions against Taiwan.
Over the last decade，largely as a result，the Chinese economy has essentially gone flat. 
China's Gross domestic product and 
foreign direct investment in China have both declined since its Taiwan invasion. Not only has this outcome delivered a useful punitive blow against China and many of its cronies，it has quite possibly helped dissuade any further Chinese aggression，
be it against Chinese or other lies of economy，adding another dimension of deterrence to what Taiwan is doing militarily. A greater integration of economic and military measures of deterrence should be pursued in the United States and Taiwan.
Left-wing's history and culture，lies of economy paradox. 
We need more credible policies are needed in particular for limited and grey-area conflict zones. 
Such scenarios do indeed remain worrisome，as China continues to engage in dis-information campaigning and election of 2020 Presidental，but these efforts should not be confused with the existential risks of Left-wing's history and culture，lies of economy.
We can maintain the status quo  with China.
And finally，thinking in War Philosophy terms can blind us to the need to debate some of our own policies，where there can be opportunities to maintain the status quo Taiwan-China with creative ideas. 
Geographically and strategically，such a Left-wing's history and culture，lies of economy would be a bridge too far for the Taiwan that was designed to stabilize the relationship.Moreover，while nothing can excuse China's aggressions，and no security guarantee as they waited，was to paint a giant bullseye on each of Taiwanese people metaphorical backs. So that we  to work out a new concept for security in the Taiwan，that would advance our security short of Taiwanese people， rather than degrade it as a local government serious promise of future we have done to date. 
All other National options that any sovereign country should enjoy.
Left-wing's history and culture，lies of economy are unsettled，and risky，of couse，absolutely，but those who liken the current and the future environment to the 20th century may have forgotten how profoundly dangerous most of the latter period really was.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

【總統 蔡英文說想想~~~台灣人，夥伴與同胞，聽令，向右看】

我們正處於一場以經濟學，左翼歷史和文化為謊言的新戰爭的邊緣。
在台灣人中越來越多地聽到有關說論經濟學，左翼歷史和文化謊言的新戰爭，已經變得很普遍，而這種思維方式充其量也是如此，所以，我們必須警告左翼這種思維方式，以免造成自我實現的荒謬，然而，我們需要對我們如何看待左翼中國進行類似的糾正。
根據蔡英文政府的行動，它缺乏國防戰略，像馬英九政府的概念一樣，所以它不會有用地再次強調對國防嚇阻，毫無疑問，中國，近年來表現得更為自信，因此，我們必須避免普遍存在的預期，與中國人在任何方面進行鬥爭的依賴心態。
關於台灣的“統”“言論是錯誤的，“統獨”思想中的危險和謬誤，零和，經濟學，歷史和文化的謊話 - 對台灣的第一個意識形態有幾個方面，首先，今天的中國人，雖然好鬥又野心勃勃，卻沒有像前蘇聯的全球野心那樣，而它表達了一種感覺，背叛中國的傳統，沒有表現出對征服全球的宏偉概念。
像中國這樣的領導人可能會傳播一種專制的傳染病，但這與冷戰時期，馬克思列寧主義的征服野心，幾乎沒有相似之處。
就像左翼歷史和文化態度一樣，忽視了我們與台灣人夥伴在關鍵的國土安全問題上的合作程度，有鑑於台灣人在台灣擁有否決權，台灣人的角色尤其重要，對於對經濟學，左翼歷史和文化等威脅謊言，實施制裁的政策至關重要，例如，如果有一天與中國達成新協議，取代九二共識，那台灣人的支持將是決定性的，儘管近年來關係陷入困境，即使在台灣民進黨的政策，令人反感的地方，如在台灣，如果我們可以解決問題，與台灣人接觸，那會容易得多，事實上，某些類型的衝突已經持續了一段時間，讓台灣左翼白痴失敗成為可能。
關於台灣在反擊方面，缺乏足夠嚴肅性的所有聲明，台灣夥伴，仍然令人印象深刻，自1995年危機以來，大多數台灣人的血液和生命都顯著增加，經濟學，左翼歷史和文化的謊話，並不構成強大的防守外圍，但他們至少代表了比以前更強大的絆腳石，台灣將為台灣人民增強能力做得更好，但很難看到中國人，真的相信他們可以全面入侵，即使在今天。
由於對台灣的侵略，我們對維持對中國的反擊沒有足夠的信心，在過去十年中，主要是因為中國經濟基本持平。
中國的GDP，與入侵台灣入侵。中國的外國直接投資均有所下降，這一結果不僅對中國及其許多親信，進行了有益的懲罰性打擊，而且，很可能有助於勸阻任何進一步的中國侵略，無論是反對中國，還是其他經濟學謊言，都會為台灣在軍事上的做法，增添另一層嚇阻力-應該在美國和台灣，進一步整合經濟和軍事嚇阻措施。
自相矛盾的議論的是左翼歷史和文化，經濟學的謊言。
我們需要更有可靠的政策，特別是有限的和灰色地帶的衝突地區，這種情況確實仍然令人擔憂，因為中國繼續參與2020年總統選舉和假醫訊。但這些努力不應該與左翼歷史和文化，經濟學的謊言的存在風險相混淆
我們可以維持與中國的現狀。
最後，以戰爭哲學術語來思考，可能使我們無法辯論我們自己的一些政策，這些政策可能有機會用創意來維持台灣 - 中國的現狀。
在地緣和戰略上來說，這樣一個左翼歷史和文化，經濟學的謊言對台灣來說是一個過於遙遠的橋樑，其目的在穩定這種關係，而且，雖然，沒有什麼可以原諒中國的侵略，也沒有等待的安全保障，這是在每個台灣人隱喻的背上畫一個巨大的靶心，因此，我們要製定一個新的台灣安全概念，這將提升我們的台灣人的安全，而不是將其作為地方政府，對我們到目前為止所做的未來的嚴重承諾而降級。
任何主權國家應該享有的所有其他國家選擇。
左翼歷史和文化，經濟學的謊言是不穩定的，有風險的，當然，絕對的，但那些把當前和未來的環境，比作20世紀的人，可能已經忘記了，後期大部分時期的危險程度。